Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.34s
Oral argument — Korenica v. Barnhart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2006
And if you file an appeal even before that period of the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4, it says if you file an appeal even before that period of time, you're not prejudiced. … And why shouldn't we allow the district court to go ahead and clean up that issue, which is clearly an appropriate thing to do, and then let us review the case?
26 min of audioOral argument — Henok v. Ashcraft
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2003
The prior counsel withdraws, and there's a period of time between that time and when the BIA act. How much time was that? I believe it was a matter of a few months. I don't know the exact dates. … So they asked for basically a 45-day period. It was still a 30-day period before the ruling where basically they were instructed they could still.
22 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Francis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2008
And so they've got to meet plein air. And the Supreme Court has said, here's how you get plein air review. You've got to show us it would have made a difference. And there you are. … Zegman's remarks, he commented that there was nowhere in the record where the defendant admitted amends REIA.
19 min of audioOral argument — Timothy Nelson v. City of Davis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2011
Well, what we have in this case is that the officers intentionally fired upon a group that had been standing there for some period of time. … But there were at least other people conducting acts of violence, and there was this one act right there.
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rami Ghanem
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021
When there's a conspiracy charged, the government typically proceeds based on the fact that an overt act occurs in the district. The indictment alleged overt acts. … Yunus, if you remember the Yunus case, was flown with air-to-air refueling, but normally people come in, in commercial, in a usual kind of way, and the government doesn't usually forum shop in advance.
44 min of audioOral argument — Thomas Prose v. Molina Healthcare of Illinois
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2021
This is a False Claims Act case at the pleading stage. … And the allegation in this case is that there wasn't any of that here, that important services were just ceased without much comment.
41 min of audioOral argument — People v. Hunter
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2013
And you want a remand for this to be tidied up, cleaned up, and taken care of? Yes. All right. Yes, and I understand what you want to do. … This court has determined on two occasions since it offhandedly commented in the 06 appeal that the record didn't reveal what happened to this petition.
36 min of audioOral argument — In Re Niaspan Antittrust Litigation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2022
And that's why comments like Kraft's comment that, oh, this would just cost $250,000 were kind of laughable. Right? … I act as an ASO. I also act as an insurer. I get notice of the class as no one's disputing or sending notice through a different database.
73 min of audioOral argument — Giorgi Rtskhiladze v. Robert Mueller, III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2023
And this is not 1974 when the Privacy Act was enacted. … The district court didn't feel the need to reach them because it agreed with us on standing, but I think they're fully aired for this court's decision.
34 min of audioOral argument — OSR Enterprises AG v. Ree Auto
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2025
And the Seventh Circuit said, no, that's just exactly what the DTSA is for, and cited Section 1837 as an act in furtherance. … I'm sure the defendant is thrilled with that because you've been capitalizing on the stolen trade secrets during this period. That started two years ago, right?
37 min of audioOral argument — People v. Pollock
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2014
And what I want to describe for your honors is the extent to which the judge in the Certificate of Innocence case was by no means writing on a clean slate. … We will take this matter under advisement, and to the written disposition within a short period. We'll now take a short recess.
36 min of audioOral argument — State of Oregon v. USDC-ORP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2023
They asked no specific questions on either of these two topics Period and so there and then they didn't depose at all her chief of staff for most of the pandemic That in December of 2020 there was a the … If you look at addendum pages 112 113 and 121 We cited Department of Education and we argue that the governor had not acted with an improper motive or outside the scope of normal channels And where was
40 min of audioOral argument — People v. Garcia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 2, 2025
However, they had the defendant exit the vehicle, and they did a free air sniff with this canine. … And the officers then act in good faith based on what the dog alerted. Would they be more appropriate for them to just say, well, be on your way because maybe the dog made a mistake?
36 min of audioOral argument — Andrew Rutherford v. Jason McKissack
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012
So, it seems that he acted responsibly in that sense. … Good, clean, thoughtful arguments. Thank you. Rutherford v. McKissack and Chin, now submitted for
37 min of audioOral argument — Lang Van, Inc. v. VNG Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2021
The letter highlights that VNG, in the jurisdictional period, actually entered into contracts with U.S. studios. … VNG might point out, oh, that's outside, per chance, the relevant jurisdictional period. It refers to conduct though, since 2012, we've been negotiating with US studios. We've been improving our act.
32 min of audioOral argument — Sue White v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2018
It's a real estate agent who has authority to act as a real estate agent and facilitate the move out from a property it's managing. That's all that is. She says in her own email, I'm not a lawyer. … That four-year period had not yet expired when judgment was entered in the second proceeding.
49 min of audioOral argument — Summer Sowash v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022
There's no sexual comments that occurred with respect to any of the touching. In fact, there's no comments at all. … I mean, in fairness, it's not like your colleagues pulling it out of thin air. I said if that's all that we had. If that's all that we had, we wouldn't be here.
36 min of audioOral argument — Lux v. Benavides
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026
It was just referred to as the Motor Carrier Act. And the proper name of the act is the Federal Motor Carrier Act. There was one glib question. … But it's not the plaintiff's duty to breathe air into their affirmative defenses. There were no... It is your duty to show prejudice.
26 min of audioOral argument — Chemours Co FCLL C v. US Prot Agency
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2024
Seemingly, they may be referring to the Clean Water Act permit that North Carolina issued. But in their briefs, and I think here, too, they've disclaimed reliance on that for purposes of standing. … And if this is final agency action, then it's a substantive final agency action that has to go through notice and comment.
32 min of audioOral argument — Paul Solomon v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017
The Naval Air Systems Command participated in the audit. … And the Court faced specifically the question of whether there was a difference from the period when they were acting as private contractors from the time that they were acting as government employees.
44 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.