Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Adelio Batres

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2018

So even if this was a comment on his not getting acceptance of responsibility, the government's duty was never triggered to not oppose acceptance. … So the conviction itself should be sustained, period. End of story.

Oral argument — Berry Plastics Corporation v. Illinois National Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2018

So you have a period of time for fresh air to sit back and review the pleadings and reacquaint yourself with issues that you know well and to look at them sometimes in different ways. … I don't have much time left, and I do want to hit a couple of comments. One is counsel mentioned that California law has evolved from ReadyPAC. With all respect, that's incorrect.

Oral argument — Affirmed Energy, LLC v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

Did you act in reliance on, on a particular vested right? Well, every time that affirmed acted, it had only a contingent, right? … The party possessed one, he acted. And when they acted, they did not have a vested right. They had a contingent, right?

Oral argument — United States v. Micah Iverson Kelly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

And so it's these products that come on the market that say things like plant food or cleaning product as a software human consumption. They're things your people use are easy to identify. … So how many other Kelly cases are out there for this period of time during which a temporary listing was in effect?

Oral argument — The Bank of New York Mellon v. Star Hill Homeowners Assoc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2023

very clear and can be resolved just off of documents subject to judicial notice from the bankruptcy court records so that we could preserve judicial resources better rather than having essentially a clean … But the Supreme Court of Nevada wrote in Thunder Properties at page 306, 503p3rd at 306, it takes more than mere notice of an adverse claim to trigger the limitations period.

Oral argument — Martin Siegel v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., (Consolidated with 17-11733, Martin Siegel, Appellants/Cross v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., Appellees/Cross Appellants)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2018

When I look at the earnings call, Air Trans CEO all but tells Delta they would implement the fee if Delta did it first. … Fornaro's public comments during an earnings call do not tend to exclude the possibility that Airtran and Delta acted independently and therefore are not a plus factor.

Oral argument — People v. Larke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2018

Next, the trial court aired and did not answer the jury's question about the effect of a deadlocked jury on the verdict. … But in Watkins, they found no period of trial judgment in his discretion. I ask that you follow your decision in Watkins and find that there was no period here.

Oral argument — Tod Tumey v. Mycroft AI, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022

The injunction restrains a former Air Force officer who holds a national ethical hacker certification and whose job was to protect our country from cyber threats. … And the reason she became a protected party was to prevent any further retaliatory acts, if indeed that was a retaliatory act.

Oral argument — Maple Drive Farms Family Limit v. Tom Vilsack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

We've cited paragraph 515.1 of this awkwardly named National Food Safety Act manual. And that provision clearly spells out that they are to conduct a minimal effects analysis. … Okay, but in any event, it's some date significantly after, that is, there's a period of time between the 1985 date and the enactment. Are we agreed there? Yes, sir. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Sandidge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2014

We believe that all of that shows the district court acted improperly, both as to assessing the enhancement and to take away the acceptance of responsibility. … The district court also commented on the defendant's inconsistencies and finding that he was not credible.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Wetzler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2012

This gets down to a balancing act. … It turned out the version was the clean version. The version was the appropriate for children version. The version that they got was the version that they got from Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Maloney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2013

Maloney's luggage, period. The prosecutor had an opportunity to ask his agents and didn't. He had an opportunity to ask Mr. Maloney on cross-examination and didn't. … You know, we — you know, we — we want people to have a fair trial and a clean trial. So do I. Yeah. But the trouble is with your people, they go overboard.

Oral argument — Juan Chavira-Munoz v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

Chavez has settled those questions but there's still a there's still some uncertainty in the air about you know what per council I think I understood Judge Fletcher's question to be more Ferreira what … would have done it wouldn't have corrected its own mistake and issued a niche of as type decision it would have did what it did in Mendoza Hernandez so and then finally I think judge Fletcher's earlier comment

Oral argument — Breakironv.Horn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2010

Why wouldn't you want to go back and do the clean slate trial when you already have to go back anyway for the murder trial? … We don't know whether he heard the comment. It could have been a matter of he wasn't paying attention.

Oral argument — Patel v. City of Anaheim

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

Weiser represented the appellant that cities have a right to regulate hotels and motels and make sure that they're clean and sanitary and don't adversely affect public health and safety. … This is where the whole dispute comes up, that after the 97 denial, there was a Public Records Act request by the Patels. Okay.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

And so laying the factual framework that Your Honor asked for, these IPRs didn't come out of thin air. … The page that you had pointed to, Judge Moore, APP Act 6394. Okay, I'm there.

Oral argument — United States v. Doble

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2009

Goebel himself wants to clear the air and ask what happened. He's speaking with the operator in a calm, cool, and cooperative manner. … First, with respect to the comment that none of the officers believed that there was an emergency. As an initial matter, as a legal matter, that's irrelevant.

Oral argument — Trevor Schleicher v. Preferred Solutions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2016

Couldn't the remedy of the employer be to say to the female, each year or whatever the time period is when people can make choices, you know that Joe is making, I'm making up names, you know that Joe is … Our argument is not that merely because a male can go in and access an upper level of management and negotiate a better wage than a woman who does the exact same work, that that cleans everything up and

Oral argument — Altera Corp. v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2017

We think it should be analyzed consistent with the purposes of the act. Now, if they said with the text of the act, they could have said that, but they didn't say that. … And commentators have noted that agreements between unrelated parties normally do not provide for these periodic adjustments.

Oral argument — Bonomi v. Gaddini

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2006

And she's acting under color of state law because the state gives her power to do what she's doing. That's her job. … Bonomi's speech was that it was just to air a purely private grievance.