Documents

Oral argument — Jannease Johnson v. DC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2025

And there, we also held that it was only for the period of time that it would have been serious, that it was serious to disclose the recording. … The April 27th interview that aired on USA 9 on, I think, May 1st.

Oral argument — Smith v. Illinois Department of Agriculture

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2024

of the Act. … But once that period expires, the Circuit Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the case.

Oral argument — United States v. Perry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2004

I mean, the issue ripened after the 70-day period elapsed. And Mr. … We told the judge that we thought there was a potential conflict that should be aired, and that's why we had a status conference when Mr. Brooklier was substituting in.

Oral argument — Sony Comp Enter Amer v. American Home Assur

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007

Explicitly, under Wrongful Act A and Wrongful Act C. That simply cannot be the controlling definition. … So the trademark infringement cause of action under the Lanham Act would be covered.

Oral argument — Helmerich & Payne Intl v. Bolivarian Rep. of Venezuela

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2015

But, you know, these rights and property don't exist in the air. … And in the comment, the restatement leaves that proposition open. And as I said – To 712? The comment is to 713. Which is a remedies section. I'm not saying you're wrong.

Oral argument — United States v. Rodrigues

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2003

Why was Jess Rodrigues never told that the Resolution Trust Corporation, which had initiated his prosecution and was acting as receiver of his savings and loan company, was at the very moment that this … Rodriguez's counsel billed during the overlapping period of time had anything whatsoever to do with Mr. Rodriguez. But beyond that, what Mr.

Oral argument — VOORHIS v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2012

But in that situation, at least my reading of the statute, the right of the period. Even if they're breaking the law and doing so? … a Hatch Act violation it is.

Oral argument — Clevo Co. v. Hecny Transportation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2013

You wouldn't be in this fix if you had gotten the agreement to extend the period of the statute of limitations from HTI, right? That's correct. … And in order for commerce, global commerce, to work, seafaring nations have established this framework in the U.S. for going back to the Harder Act, which preceded the Carriage Goods by Sea Act, for over

Oral argument — Cableview Communicatons of Jacksonville, INC. v. Time Warner Cable Southeast LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2018

Time Warner, FTS, and Cableview all acted in a matter consistent with that blessing of the deal and the transition. … Over that period of time, Your Honor, we discovered that they were, in fact, not accurate. Got it. Thank you, Your Honors. Thank you so much.

Oral argument — United States v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2011

Are there any cases involving seizure of data floating in the air as opposed to papers? … Our view is that currently the use of a cell phone, that's a voluntary act. People nowadays understand that there are ways to monitor by way of a cell phone.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenton Eagle Chasing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2020

The other decision was on plain air review. It also looked at double jeopardy. But certainly in this case, we're not on plain air review. … Eagle Jason acted appropriately as he was supposed to. I rely on the briefing for the rest of the remaining arguments that we have. And thank you for your time and hearing this case.

Oral argument — Juliette Morizur v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2022

an improper purpose or acted in bad faith. … Bad smelling air gives you an injury in fact. But you have to actually sniff the air, and it actually has to stink.

Oral argument — April-Lee Williams v. MCImetro Access Transmission S

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

The second issue is whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, known as the TCPA, preempts this Washington statute. … Period. There's no opportunities for alternative results. It's clear that an ADAD is an ADAD for purposes of this statute.

Oral argument — People v. McClung

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2016

We did its balancing act where the defendant really talks a lot in his brief more about the balancing act, saying that it wasn't done, and it sounds like it wasn't done. … But so you're saying his comments regarding weighing were made in the context of comparing it to D. G.

Oral argument — Western & Lake Check Cashers, LLC v. Propane Pete, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

Jones or possibly an act of God. Or maybe I should say an act of the devil. … And the logic of your argument, in my personal opinion, is if we were to accept your argument, there would be no more holders in due course, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Micah Iverson Kelly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

And so it's these products that come on the market that say things like plant food or cleaning product as a software human consumption. They're things your people use are easy to identify. … So how many other Kelly cases are out there for this period of time during which a temporary listing was in effect?

Oral argument — The Bank of New York Mellon v. Star Hill Homeowners Assoc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2023

very clear and can be resolved just off of documents subject to judicial notice from the bankruptcy court records so that we could preserve judicial resources better rather than having essentially a clean … But the Supreme Court of Nevada wrote in Thunder Properties at page 306, 503p3rd at 306, it takes more than mere notice of an adverse claim to trigger the limitations period.

Oral argument — Cotton v. County of Santa Barb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2008

If you read his comments, he says, Counsel, it's just not there. It wasn't there when we argued it below. The record hasn't changed. … What else can you do with someone who has been acting out, has been threatening, and now screams no and turns around?

Oral argument — Tod Tumey v. Mycroft AI, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022

The injunction restrains a former Air Force officer who holds a national ethical hacker certification and whose job was to protect our country from cyber threats. … And the reason she became a protected party was to prevent any further retaliatory acts, if indeed that was a retaliatory act.

Oral argument — Juan Chavira-Munoz v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

Chavez has settled those questions but there's still a there's still some uncertainty in the air about you know what per council I think I understood Judge Fletcher's question to be more Ferreira what … would have done it wouldn't have corrected its own mistake and issued a niche of as type decision it would have did what it did in Mendoza Hernandez so and then finally I think judge Fletcher's earlier comment