Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.23s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Hatchet Speed

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2025

    Speed simply purchased products that are solvent traps or gun cleaning drip containers essentially and these devices were in his in the original packaging and plainly marked solvent traps and yet the government … he didn't even possess a drill press didn't had never had never altered anything like this hadn't in fact he had a record of 100% total compliance with the strict requirements of the National Firearms Act

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — POSCO v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019

    In this case, we put on the record the system marginal price, the marginal price, the variable cost of electricity that's on KPX's schedule for the period of review. … This is for the period that's under review? Correct, Your Honor. Correct, Your Honor. In fact, well, I can direct Your Honor to the actual appendix site where you can find it.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Porter

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019

    And here, the unconditional plea was taken months before the allegedly ambiguous comments. They wouldn't, so the comments wouldn't have affected the, your client's decision to take the plea. … Period.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Iowa Pork Producers Association v. Rob Bonta

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

    there was a cost of compliance issue on prop 12 that was made before that didn't seem to go anywhere yes you're not so you're not making that argument so let me let me clarify just if I can make one comment … And so now we're back here drawing on a clean slate. And you're saying you didn't do anything because you didn't have to and now if you have to, then you want six years.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Michael Swanson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2017

    Rosman requires that the intent, as opposed to the affirmative act, in aiding and abetting liability, go to the entire scope of the crime. … Alexander as the bad person and that he's the innocent guy trying to clean everything up. It's the only way I can read them.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Curtin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2006

    There was a period where there were being stories that were underlying. … He incorporated them into his chats and into his acts. And in specific, he, the stories, many of the stories talked about little girls when they get their periods, whether they can get pregnant.

    63 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lang Van, Inc. v. VNG Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2021

    The letter highlights that VNG, in the jurisdictional period, actually entered into contracts with U.S. studios. … VNG might point out, oh, that's outside, per chance, the relevant jurisdictional period. It refers to conduct though, since 2012, we've been negotiating with US studios. We've been improving our act.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010

    In 2005, Congress passed the Bankruptcy Act. It made a policy decision to limit judicial discretion on a case-by-case basis in the area of reasonable and necessary expenses. … Food, clothing, house cleaning supplies, those are part of the national standards.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nelson Pleitez-Bermudez v. Merrick Garland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2022

    Because the threats were directed to him, his wife, and his two minor children, they all fled together, a short period of time after the threats were made. … But I don't think we got a clean holding out of the BIA that that was a cognizable group, did we? Or out of our court? I think we only said that, well, even the problem is she can't get out of it.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 05-55192) TRUSTEES OF SO CAL BAKERY v. MIDDLETON

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2006

    Again, this is purely hypothetical, so we're all sort of spinning in the air about this. This never came up, ever. … That's why we ask hypothetical questions and we speculate, as you have commented at least 20 times.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Patel v. City of Anaheim

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

    Weiser represented the appellant that cities have a right to regulate hotels and motels and make sure that they're clean and sanitary and don't adversely affect public health and safety. … This is where the whole dispute comes up, that after the 97 denial, there was a Public Records Act request by the Patels. Okay.

    19 min of audio
  • Oral argument — City of New York v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 24, 2014

    You had made a comment before about the Supreme Court determining that the Rail Act was not an exercise of eminent domain power, but I thought the Rail Act actually said that it was in part enacted as … There's no evidence that Congress intended the fresh start for a clean slate policy here to wipe out the covenants running with the land.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Velarde v. GW GJ, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2018

    Or just for the periods when he was doing kind of janitorial services, the low educational value time? No, Your Honor. Our position is that he should be compensated for the entire time. … And yet, every few customers, he walks to the corner of the room, grabs a wooden-handled brush, and pushes the hair around our seat and cleans up after himself. It's part of the job.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Johnnie Savory v. William Cannon, Sr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2019

    And so in Illinois, if you're in custody, you can file a successive post-conviction petition under that act. … But do you think, though, in keeping with your comments here, can you identify any case along along the lines of the rule that you're advancing that would require overruling?

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DeNofrio v. DVA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

    Struthers to continue to act as a physician. In, in addition to that, Mr. … And that is that we had three management people, after my client became a whistleblower, make comments that were very, very similar. And that is Mr.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Eileen Schuman, John Brock, Susan Noe v. Lee County Board of County Commissioners, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, d.b.a. Lee County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2017

    What I'm saying is that I think that the decision maker, and I think he testified to this, wanted to clean house. I don't think there's any question about that. … And she was kept on for some period to allow her to do this, right? And she didn't do it. And she didn't do it. And so our point...

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — AVEDIAN v. ASHCROFT

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2004

    And then after that, as she did not have a she had a period of not being disturbed. But it's after she left that she has the concerns. … In its decision, the board noted that it had considered petitioner's brief and even commented that it had been a well-reasoned brief.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Golden

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2008

    clean hands either. … If you are going to allow late notices of appeal, as the Supreme Court rule stands now, they can only be allowed within a six-month period of time.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Holena

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2018

    Holina has raised, and specifically to pick up on a point that the government addressed in its brief about the apparent inconsistencies in the district court's imposition of the Special Conditions Act … It makes sense to clean it up now rather than to wait for squabbling over which of the terms he's violated. There's conflict in there.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Ludwikowski

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2019

    Lew Bukoski, but others who are talking about a present extortion scheme would often be forced to discuss prior criminal activity, prior bad acts of some kind. … And you need to come clean with us. That's right. That's right. Because you're asking us to go out there and take action on your behalf.

    47 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.