Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Andre Watson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2021

Uh, do you, do you concede that it's under plain air review? … Why wouldn't that be, um, a basis for concluding that there was no plain air? Right.

Oral argument — United States v. Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

This has been going on for some period of time, and that's not inconsistent with what he argued, that he's in the transportation role only. … In short, the fact that we're left with kind of an ambiguous possibly comments from the judge here that have caused this appeal, the burden for that falls on the defendant.

Oral argument — Vargas-De-Jesus v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2016

seen by the police at a location and nothing in regards to the defendant committing any substantive offenses or overt acts in conjunction with the conspiracy. … Doesn't that lead to an air of incompetence? Well, she did vigorously argue regarding his age.

Oral argument — United States v. Grant (Reichberg)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2020

I'd like to hear your comments also about whether any favoritism was shown other than possibly in timing, even if we conceive of it as an official act. … But here, the government, in some sense, was in a position in which we knew the responsiveness review would take quite some time, a period of many months.

Oral argument — Raven Fox v. Dakkota Integrated Systems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2020

First, they contended that the air carriers implemented the systems without their consent, and second, that they failed to publish protocols. … It is the collector that simply has to act or not. They have to act, number one, by establishing a public, public schedule, not just a workplace schedule. Well, which complies with the criteria of A.

Oral argument — NW Requirments Utilties v. BPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2005

We had discussions with the Bonneville Power Administration about that, the period of negotiation. … There are arguments about whether Bonneville acted arbitrarily or capriciously or acted in violation of law, and that those are rate case determinations.

Oral argument — Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2015

I would say that the first question is, can you use this kind of averaging in a run-mine case, period, under Rule 23? … up and the people who actually slaughter the hogs because the clean-up people are going to slaughter the hogs at 4 hours at the end of the shift and the other.

Oral argument — Estate of Max Martinez v. Federal Way

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2004

So this had gone on for a period of time. And also the comment, there's going to be some shooting here. So let's just assume that they're out to the side. They're not pointing at anyone. … The next issue in the case, and every claim in this, I submit, falls from the determination that this officer acted objectively reasonable.

Oral argument — People v. Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 2, 2025

However, they had the defendant exit the vehicle, and they did a free air sniff with this canine. … And the officers then act in good faith based on what the dog alerted. Would they be more appropriate for them to just say, well, be on your way because maybe the dog made a mistake?

Oral argument — Sean Blake v. U.S. Attorney General

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2022

And because after all, Coke is paying for, or the shower posse, I guess, is paying for all kinds of improvements in Tivoli Gardens, and basically acting as a de facto government there. … It looks like what it meant was should have been filed in the sort of inter-appeal period. So regardless of my attempt to understand the situation, it's unclear, undeniably.

Oral argument — James Richardson v. Joyce Kornegay

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

Richardson's trial counsel was objectively unreasonable in failing to appreciate and act on that admissibility requirement to ensure that the expert observed both parties' witnesses. … Obviously, here it wasn't an offhanded comment.

Oral argument — State of Oregon v. USDC-ORP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2023

They asked no specific questions on either of these two topics Period and so there and then they didn't depose at all her chief of staff for most of the pandemic That in December of 2020 there was a the … If you look at addendum pages 112 113 and 121 We cited Department of Education and we argue that the governor had not acted with an improper motive or outside the scope of normal channels And where was

Oral argument — People v. Bell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010

In this case, the 58-year-old defendant and Penny have lived together for 10 or 11 months, a significant period of time. … Did you provide any authority to this Court dealing with the question of assuming common authority exists, when and how it's terminated, over what period of time and what acts?

Oral argument — United Gilsonite Laboratories v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2011

Which are both bringing this under the purview of the act. Yes. Okay. … Bergman did not have sarcoidosis before December the 19th or around that time period of 1996.

Oral argument — Emmerich Nwspr v. Particle Media

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2026

During the glitch period, help me understand why that violated the Copyright Act under the terms that we've been talking about, transmit, copy, fixed. … Emmerich may clean things off his website eventually, but not in this timeframe.

Oral argument — United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

DOJ just can't pluck something out of the air. But there is no administrative exhaustion requirement under section 592. It requires customs to take certain actions, which it did here. … Your Honor, I do want to start with a few comments about things that have been said by the Department of Justice here.

Oral argument — Tod Tumey v. Mycroft AI, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022

The injunction restrains a former Air Force officer who holds a national ethical hacker certification and whose job was to protect our country from cyber threats. … And the reason she became a protected party was to prevent any further retaliatory acts, if indeed that was a retaliatory act.

Oral argument — United States v. Donald Allen Jr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2017

I think it was even a shorter period of time than that. I thought it was just maybe two days. Maybe two days, okay. But whatever was subsequent to that. … But still we would, again, obviously I'm out of time, but I think as far as the search is concerned that I would agree with your comments or what I understood your comments to be, Judge Stranch, that a

Oral argument — Ovedo-Chavez v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2025

That was when his briefing schedule was due on November, where there was literally a clean slate in the Ninth Circuit, where the Ninth Circuit said, we do not know what the rule is and we're going to hold … It says here he did not meet his burden of proof for withholding of removal under the act or for CAT.

Oral argument — James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

It has to be a connection to an act. … If you were writing, we're on a clean slate, we have no Barthel nothing, we're writing on a clean slate about what does relating to add, what does it add?