Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Istvan Kopacz

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2024

So with regard to the issue of the comment, this is a picture of defendant, or this displays the defendant's face, I think was the comment. That was clear, clearly erroneous, right? No, Your Honors. … Our position there is the — anything that was elicited, like, for questions that only an expert could have, someone with this — I think the cases say, like, this air — like, it's this air of expertise.

Oral argument — Camp Hill Borough Republican Assn v. Borough Camp Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

I was telling Judge Jordan yesterday, it reminded me of a famous episode on 60 Minutes where somebody is in England trying to find someone who's not cleaning up after their dog because the dog was fouling … And I just like to address quickly, briefly, some of the comments that I heard and questions.

Oral argument — American Clean Power Assoc v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2022

20-1499 American Clean Power Association Petitioner v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Mr. Tabak for the Petitioner, Ms. Pasella for the Respondent. Good morning. … So there's no payment for these facilities until the post-construction period.

Oral argument — Sony Computer Entertainment America,Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007

Explicitly, under Wrongful Act A and Wrongful Act C, that simply cannot be the controlling definition. … So the trademark infringement cause of action under the Lanham Act would be covered.

Oral argument — Kenneth Daugherty v. Richard Harrington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

That's the retaliatory act. That can't possibly be the protected speech that precedes the supposedly retaliatory act. Can't be both. I agree. … or failed to act despite that awareness.

Oral argument — United States v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2025

I don't recall seeing any evidence about seeing other people in the cars running their air conditioning, etc., etc., what you just said. Did I miss that? … So, Your Honor, I think Judge Oreck's comments need to be considered in the overall context in which they were made.

Oral argument — April-Lee Williams v. MCImetro Access Transmission S

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

The second issue is whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, known as the TCPA, preempts this Washington statute. … Period. There's no opportunities for alternative results. It's clear that an ADAD is an ADAD for purposes of this statute.

Oral argument — James Head v. Eric Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2015

Williams wasn't written on a clean slate. We had led the way in Streeter. I agree with that. I think the court could view Streeter as a roadmap. … So still this court was not ready to act on that roadmap if, in fact, Streeter was.

Oral argument — B.W. v. Austin Indep School Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024

And here, we're here today to talk about discrimination based upon race, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But it is not about political hurt. … Sometimes there's a rain, and the rain just clears the air, and you wake up the next morning, and it's fresh and sunny. It's a new day.

Oral argument — Serge Haitayan v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2019

They worked for long periods of time. This isn't a plumber coming into your house on a one-time basis to fix your sink. … All right, you can make a 30-second comment.

Oral argument — Decatur Manor Healthcare v. J.J. Swartz Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013

So in that instance, the second judge is acting entirely consistently with the first judge. … He did this well within the 30-day time period after his August 16 order was entered. So he's within the time to amend or modify his judgment. He makes it disappear, but now we have...

Oral argument — People v. Cunningham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017

I think, let the jury know that there was 13 contacts in this time period. … And I know my opponent is arguing plain-air exception, and the state is responding that the evidence was not closely balanced, so plain-air should not apply.

Oral argument — Vermilion Coal Company v. Black Beauty Coal Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2009

I thought there was testimony from Keeney that there would be permanent damage to the mine, that there have to be operating machines that air it out and pump the water out. … Could you sue under the Franchise Disclosure Act, even though it's a statute because it's referenced in here? Could you do that in arbitration? Yes.

Oral argument — United States v. Chowdhury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

Chowdhury acted, as the District Court found, quite deliberately. It was not an act of impulse the way that those other cases were. Here, the District Judge found it very persuasive that Mr. … My only point though, Your Honor, is just the comment that I just heard. I just wanted to just clean up just a little bit there. I'm not downplaying the dangerousness of it.

Oral argument — Thomas Navarro v. United States Center for SafeSport

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2025

I mean, the idea that somebody could be competing who has been doping, it's part of that effort to make the game clean. … So under the 1990 Victim of Child Abuse Act, that act traditionally is for professionals who work on federal land and in federal facilities. But now NGB members are subject to that act.

Oral argument — In re: K. GILMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2018

The Chandler Act, I'm not sure how it came about. … You're running over the point, though, and it goes to Judge Taylor's comment. Again, you won. Yeah.

Oral argument — United States v. Harold Hall, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017

I need you to comment on that. Two comments. Number one, Mr. Hall's defense was not, I was never there. It was, I was there. I occasionally showed up. … And in Rooks, the court was interpreting the prior case law of Queen, where the court actually explicitly said that the more similar the prior act, both in terms of physical similarity and mental state

Oral argument — Zaffiri v. Pontiac RV Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

Well, they sold them air. What does they have to know? Well, we didn't know. We sold them air. It was nothing. But we sold it to them. … You can't sell air normally without, you know, you didn't prove a fraudulent intent on our behalf. Is that required?

Oral argument — 1-19-2255

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2020

Shaliga referred to, section 217C, was actually permitted the board to make that correction in the air. … Now at that point, and it's been commented a couple times, he's a lay person. There's no question that the Riverside, or I'm sorry, the River Forest Community Center could have been a participant.

Oral argument — Kathryn Torres v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2021

May it please the Court, my name is Margaret Lerkind, on behalf of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. … The relevant period spans about three years and two months.