Documents

Oral argument — USVALDO TRUJILLO v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2013

This was an intentional and a deceptive act. Moreover, it was serious in that it involved forcification, which called into question Mr. Trujillo's trustworthiness. … Not only a supervisor, but he was the director of air operations of this base.

Oral argument — United States v. Andre Watson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2021

Uh, do you, do you concede that it's under plain air review? … Why wouldn't that be, um, a basis for concluding that there was no plain air? Right.

Oral argument — United States v. Aaron Thorpe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2024

So I think that there, the Rule 33 provides a three-year time period for a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. … And when the prosecution continues in the sense that the government has some control to agree to relief during that time period.

Oral argument — Tovar-Reyes v. Blanche

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026

In O'Reilly, the timing period was that faro order, which is a different type of administrative order, and that's the actual instrument that orders removal, not the later cat determinations, which for … Garland stating that Loper-Bright doesn't wipe the slate clean and that this court still has to respect its prior precedent.

Oral argument — Dept. of Education v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2023

The HEROES Act specifies that waivers and modifications issued under the HEROES Act are exempt from notice and comment. … In other words, it's not speculative in the question of how would that person be remedied, but it is another borrower you're asking for notice and comment, and during that period, if it's granted, it would

Oral argument — United States v. Grant (Reichberg)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2020

I'd like to hear your comments also about whether any favoritism was shown other than possibly in timing, even if we conceive of it as an official act. … But here, the government, in some sense, was in a position in which we knew the responsiveness review would take quite some time, a period of many months.

Oral argument — Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2015

I would say that the first question is, can you use this kind of averaging in a run-mine case, period, under Rule 23? … up and the people who actually slaughter the hogs because the clean-up people are going to slaughter the hogs at 4 hours at the end of the shift and the other.

Oral argument — Estate of Max Martinez v. Federal Way

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2004

So this had gone on for a period of time. And also the comment, there's going to be some shooting here. So let's just assume that they're out to the side. They're not pointing at anyone. … The next issue in the case, and every claim in this, I submit, falls from the determination that this officer acted objectively reasonable.

Oral argument — George Steen v. Leslie Dismukes

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026

As well as after the period of concern, all of his sex behaviors exhibited were towards males. … Steen was done cleaning MS, he would hand MS out to Mrs. Steen, and she would go take him and get ready, and Mr. Steen would take a shower.

Oral argument — United States v. Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2008

For marijuana, though, I would imagine that nine baggies and 6.2 grams could sustain someone for a fairly lengthy period of time. … You know, the best way to try a case is do it clean and right and fast. And, Your Honor, I believe that was done here.

Oral argument — Fagbemi v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2014

Instead of that being done here, it seemed to be more of a situation was, well, you violated this rule, you didn't do this act, so boom, we're fined against you and we're firing you. … The argument is made that while slugs in the past occurred, but these are really tiny slugs and only a very, very short period of time, would the census get followed up?

Oral argument — People v. Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 2, 2025

However, they had the defendant exit the vehicle, and they did a free air sniff with this canine. … And the officers then act in good faith based on what the dog alerted. Would they be more appropriate for them to just say, well, be on your way because maybe the dog made a mistake?

Oral argument — Wilkins v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2022

Is the way we go about statutory interpretation today to wipe the slate clean and let's say we're going back to the beginning? … Because whether it's jurisdictional or not is up in the air. So we could settle this case.

Oral argument — State of Oregon v. USDC-ORP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2023

They asked no specific questions on either of these two topics Period and so there and then they didn't depose at all her chief of staff for most of the pandemic That in December of 2020 there was a the … If you look at addendum pages 112 113 and 121 We cited Department of Education and we argue that the governor had not acted with an improper motive or outside the scope of normal channels And where was

Oral argument — Gordon Martin v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2022

And the other thing is if he worked in the air-conditioned or a heated environment, he had to get in his car in the garage and drive to his work and park and go into work. … The question is, did the ALJ act wholly without reason? And it is our contention that the ALJ did act reasonably.

Oral argument — United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

DOJ just can't pluck something out of the air. But there is no administrative exhaustion requirement under section 592. It requires customs to take certain actions, which it did here. … Your Honor, I do want to start with a few comments about things that have been said by the Department of Justice here.

Oral argument — Tod Tumey v. Mycroft AI, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022

The injunction restrains a former Air Force officer who holds a national ethical hacker certification and whose job was to protect our country from cyber threats. … And the reason she became a protected party was to prevent any further retaliatory acts, if indeed that was a retaliatory act.

Oral argument — DICKSON v. CHASEMELLON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2005

If she had, and that's what she acted on. The problem was that over here was an opinion letter that was never looked at in this process at all. … That finding is a clean finding. It is not infected by reasonableness, which has to do with whether the transfer was rightful or not.

Oral argument — United States v. Keith Shrum

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2022

Shrum knew, if anything, what he was told or by whom, or if it is simply just this generic something's in the air, something's happening. … Shrum and the child without success for a period of time. Eventually, they find them back at the home. They had Mr.

Oral argument — Brownsteinv.Lindsay,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2013

I mean, the question of whether or not the district judge may order the cancellation of a copyright is one that's kind of up in the air. … I'm not sure whether he knew it or didn't know it really, because she acted in a manner that was consistent with the co-authorship.