Documents

Oral argument — Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

I would suggest drawing it at during the relevant time period of representation. Fair enough. … Ellis, we simply cannot start with the presumption that he acted in Mr. Ellis' best interest. And if we're not presuming that he acted in Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Barnes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

That he did this cleaning up after the child soiled himself with the intent to abuse the child, to harm the child. What about this whole case shows that? Okay. … Even if they didn't, how do we know that there was an intent to hurt this child, to disfigure this child, to abuse this child, and not just clean him up?

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Reynolds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2010

Well, I agree it's not a question of pulling a number out of the air. We don't want to do that. Right. But isn't it something that the trial judge still needs to do? … That didn't seem like what her hand does, acting him out to shoot her. And in essence, Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Rasheed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2018

Actually, Your Honor, for the Sherman Act, I don't think we even need to show that. … It's not a conspiracy that can exist for any period of time.

Oral argument — James Lyons v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2016

Assumed a growth in number of flights over a period of time. They made a wrong assumption, but put that aside. Did assume a growth in the number of flights. … Christy, do you have a comment? I would like to speak to the issue of cumulative impacts.

Oral argument — Orr v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2026

Why should it be kept if the party who doesn't want it for an interim period says, I don't want this? We don't think it should be kept. … How are we advancing anything by offering more estimates, I guess, where the next step of this is the final act, so to speak? They can brief those arguments below.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Stewart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

And that they knew that they had been unable to obtain any refinancing during that period. So why isn't that a false statement? … And I say that in the sense of as opposed to Shields, which would go to one of Judge Pratt's questions before, I'm not even sure we get to the plain air part of the air because in Shields the omission,

Oral argument — Clevo Co. v. Hecny Transportation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2013

You wouldn't be in this fix if you had gotten the agreement to extend the period of the statute of limitations from HTI, right? That's correct. … And in order for commerce, global commerce, to work, seafaring nations have established this framework in the U.S. for going back to the Harder Act, which preceded the Carriage Goods by Sea Act, for over

Oral argument — United States v. John Moore, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

If the Macy case that came down that said if an attorney, by doing an unconscious act of sleeping, prejudiced his client, and certainly a willful and volitional. … Moore's comments and said nothing about the Alford plea? I don't believe it would have been error.

Oral argument — Bonomi v. Gaddini

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2006

And she's acting under color of state law because the state gives her power to do what she's doing. That's her job. … Bonomi's speech was that it was just to air a purely private grievance.

Oral argument — Andy Mohr Truck Center, Inc. v. Volvo Trucks North America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

How many transactions over what period of time are we supposed to look at this 13? … One final comment. How did you prove that? We brought the expert, Mr. Faulkner, in to testify after reviewing all 20,000 records, all of them.

Oral argument — Vepo Design Corporation v. American Economy Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2024

So that does seem like that was something up in the air. Well, the thing to keep in mind is, although they owed a total of $6 million to Alliance, they only owed $875,000 on that location. … So I'm here to answer any questions that the panel may have regarding our position or any comments made by counsel.

Oral argument — Howard v. Rebitzer Properties, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

And in this case, it was the result of a negligent or tortious act. … And the comments suggest that. Restatement section 343, in particular comment D, talks about an invitee onto a property is entitled to have certain expectations.

Oral argument — Con-way Freight, Incorporated v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2016

It could have been a general comment toward that. … Carroll Contracting and Ready Mix cited in our brief that stand for the proposition that single acts and independent acts can indeed and should be aggregated in terms of their overall impact on voter and

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Zuber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2020

Well, that's exactly what the act has provided under Section 510. … He has to literally lay down for periods of time when he has that kind of pain. The pain medication that he takes, obviously, does not cut the pain.

Oral argument — Donald Lusnak v. Bank of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2016

And one way to read that, and many commentators have read that, is an underlining, an emphasis to say, hey, we mean it. Right. We mean it. Right. … I mean, that's we know that Dodd-Frank was heavily focused on cleaning up what was happening at large banks just like Bank of America. That's a real stretch.

Oral argument — Rainbow School, Inc. v. Rainbow Early Education

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018

But I don't think we're at a stage where we focus on the elements of a Lanham Act violation. … It could turn out that you're clean. I mean, we have to undergo the audit in either event.

Oral argument — People of the State of New York v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2025

If you think, as defendant has put it, the Supreme Court's decision wipes the slate clean. They still did not act sufficiently diligently to meet the general requirements of the statute. … But it is also correct to say that the slate is not in fact wiped clean.

Oral argument — American Clean Power Assoc v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2022

20-1499 American Clean Power Association Petitioner v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Mr. Tabak for the Petitioner, Ms. Pasella for the Respondent. Good morning. … So there's no payment for these facilities until the post-construction period.

Oral argument — Bruce Betzner v. Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

They stated that it was based on the class size of 400 plaintiffs, the time period of over 10 years, the number of wells, which was 700, and also explained the way about how they quantified the plaintiff's … So I disagree because DART-Cherokee is under a mountain controversy, and, again, the grounds for removal are under the Class Action Fairness Act and 1332.