Documents

Oral argument — People v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2011

the key here is that the 5% number comes out of thin air. … The amortization period is set in order to avoid over-recovery if the period is too short, but there are other balancing factors as well.

Oral argument — Curtis Ervin v. Ron Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2021

Anderson did not limit his prejudicial comments towards Jewish people, but also African-Americans. … The toxic air was so severe that paint was peeling off of houses, paint was peeling off of cars.

Oral argument — Arctic Slope Native Assoc v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2009

Congress was entitled to assume that it meant that period and no more. … The Fair Labor Standards Act, the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, both of those acts say, no, we're not going to do Rule 23 class actions in the usual way.

Oral argument — Dianna Humphrey v. Remington Arms Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2015

They're, one gun, one rifle is being cleaned. One rifle is somebody stepping into a car with a rifle. … The period of limitation, when I'm looking at 27-2-102, it says the period of limitation does not begin on any claim or cause of action for an injury to a person until the facts constituting the claim

Oral argument — Paulo v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2011

But it's not, for our purposes, a clean holding that binds us. Actually, you know, I was looking for that. … But we have cases all the time where somebody is afforded relief under the law that exists at time period A. They're entitled to that relief.

Oral argument — Juan Castillo v. Loretta E. Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015

Once the I.J. does this ministerial act, what grounds does he have for appeal to the BIA? … They have their own independent 30-day petition for review period.

Oral argument — Robert Olson v. Randstad HR Solutions of Delaw

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2024

He was also submitted to West Bend Mutual approximately 10 times by employment agencies over the same period. … So Judge Adelman cleaned up business by taking care of the state law claims so that there was nothing left to be addressed.

Oral argument — Goldfine v. Ferrazzano

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2014

Because the legal malpractice defendant did not violate the Act. … So the ISBA and CBA just didn't make this up out of thin air, as the plaintiffs seem to suggest in their brief.

Oral argument — Koerner v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2003

Koerner was the broker of record from the period 1990 all the way through to 1999, midnight, December 31st, a period just one minute shy of ten years. Now, who is Heritage really? It's Dr. … But as Judge Coyle recognized and as we argued below, there is a transition period for each next period of insurance. And therefore, for all insurance to be issued as of January 1, 2000, Mr.

Oral argument — Faour Fraihat v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2019

And again, there was a seven year period where Mr. Freyhot was free from immigration detention from 2008 until 2016. And this was the only conviction sustained in that period. … And he was under supervised release and he had to have checks for use of controlled substances and the like, and he'd gone for an extended period of time with a clean record.

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Lafley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011

With respect to the suggestion of plain air, we objected in the district court on religious freedom grounds. … Because it wouldn't necessarily come up even for a religious practitioner for the period of probation.

Oral argument — Peck v. Cingular Wireless

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2008

If there was a clean slate, I might have a more difficult case. But we don't have a clean slate. We have numerous FCC orders that are not invalidated by the 11th Circuit. … I had a few comments about some of the matters that were raised, but if the court has questions, I'll take those because I only have a couple minutes.

Oral argument — Morgen v. US Dept of Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2009

The district court correctly concluded that this case must be dismissed under the discretionary function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act. … Mangold said that as soon as the low-dose exposures, that wasn't something they were considering back during that time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Paula Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012

Harris wrote two checks to am AC shortly after that how they before she wrote the day before Thomas wrote right okay and did we ever find any link did the government ever allege any link between those two acts … Thomas we had the extra piece of evidence you recall that his son testified you know I asked my dad what he does for a living and he said I help people with their campaigns in exchange for contracts to clean

Oral argument — United States v. Adams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2021

For purposes of the Speedy Trial Act, when there's a response, my argument is that it stops the time period. It doesn't hold all the time period. It just stops the time period. … So in fairness, a period from August until September is not unreasonable, Your Honor, and there's plenty of cases even in this circuit where there's much longer periods.

Oral argument — Estateof Oliva v. Stateof NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

And it all comes down to there just wasn't the evidence connecting these alleged wrongful acts to any defendant, and certainly the connection that Oliva, that they were based on complaints of racial profiling … We ignore the evidence of Haggerty, who was the press secretary for the state police, who testified that he saw Dunbar almost daily talk to him about these issues and commented to the press initially that

Oral argument — Sarver v. TA Travel Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

Here, we didn't have the proposed security measures except in one comment in the opposition to the motion for assembly judgment talking about security forces. … I could tell from a distance he was acting weird, and on drugs, I warned him to leave. But he kept coming back because he said he needed money for drugs.

Oral argument — Sec US Dept of Labor v. East Penn Manufacturing Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024

So that's the second half of my comments. That's not about the liability issue. That's about burden shifting on the amount of damages. … The fact of the matter is the Secretary's recordkeeping regulation at 785.47 says that in recording working time under the Act, insubstantial or insignificant periods of time, blah, blah, blah, may be

Oral argument — State of Maryland v. Stephen Dickson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2019

NEPA, the National Historic Preservation Act, and Section 4F of the Transportation Department Act each required the FAA to analyze those impacts, and the FAA's complete failure to comply with those laws … There was never a 60-day period where no one did anything.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2024

And the jury had to decide, or could split on, which act was done. There's one act. One act. There's one act. No doubt. The jury either found that act or didn't. … Well, there's not a question of different acts if we're looking at temporal periods of time. I believe that's correct.