Documents

Oral argument — Nickolas Seekins v. CHEP USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2021

For all I know, there's a subcontractor that cleans the place. … Seekins on the expectation that Chet would have acted a certain way.

Oral argument — USAv.Berberena

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2012

Well, they're operating on a clean slate here. … Dillon says it's a congressional act of lenity. Yes, it's a congressional act of lenity. And that's why, the bottom line is, Congress had the authority to set the...

Oral argument — Lombardo v. Dr. Seuss Enterpri

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2018

But turning to the substance, the Rogers test says when the purpose is to amuse and not to confuse, the Lanham Act should be construed narrowly. There's a two-factor test. … The point is to have a laugh while also commenting on the original and whatever comment the author has on it.

Oral argument — Prometheus v. FCCpart1

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 24, 2011

This means that they can simultaneously air multiple television channels with a single broadcast license. … In each four-periodic review, the Commission keeps reinstating them. There's nothing different with respect to that.

Oral argument — JTH Tax, Incorporated v. Gregory Aime

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2020

I'm here to make a brief comment. This is not an appropriate case for relief under the high standard of Rule 59e. … to May period.

Oral argument — Thomas Creech v. John Hardison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012

So the period during which he has an unchallenged plea of guilty is actually a fairly short period. So let me come back to, again, your argument as to ineffective assistance of counsel. … Keeney, and leading up to that plea, the communication period is important as well. So leading up to the plea.

Oral argument — Baker v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2008

And this Court itself acknowledged the strength of Exxon's argument that the Clean Water Act precluded punitive damages altogether. … In fact, the Court denied without comment plaintiff's cross petition for certiorari seeking to restore the award to $5 billion.

Oral argument — United States v. Jarvis Tolbert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015

Our position is that, first of all, if you didn't have the right to actually let them enter the room, period. Why not? … Well, the police were acting with the authority that the hotel had at that time.

Oral argument — Brand Services, L.L.C. v. Irex Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

With that said, the other comment I have to make is, is that this is another very important point. … The act is called the Uniform Trade Secret Act. It's not the Uniform Business Information Act. It's very clear. Courts go both ways. We're not in California. We're not in Pennsylvania.

Oral argument — Laursen v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2004

During the period that is covered by the onset date and the adverse hearing decision, she was between 50 and 52 and a half years old. The commissioner has concluded that Ms. … She was getting help to get on and off the toilet and to have her food prepared and to have her home cleaned. I don't think there's any dispute that your client is not a well woman.

Oral argument — Massetti v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2005

It's a working paper on corruption in Italy, and it relates to the time period that's at issue in this case. … It says, After 1992, the Clean Hands investigation of political corruption brought about the most serious political crisis in the history of the Italian Republic.

Oral argument — United States v. Henderson (Becton)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020

It's such a burden on counsel to undertake that periodic payments were committed, et cetera. … But he went through – yeah, he went through teams of prosecutors during that period, and that's why it took so long.

Oral argument — Smith v. Vannoy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2021

district court's dismissal of the petitioner's second habeas petition should be affirmed because the petitioner failed to meet the stringent requirements of the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act … It's really this, you know, 10 minute time period.

Oral argument — +Third Wave Tech v. Stratagene

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

Indeed, it was TWT's witness who told the jury that an injunction was issued, and the damage period, therefore, was only 18 months. … For quite a short period of time. Let me address first the concept of up-front payment.

Oral argument — Westminster American v. Spruce1530LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2021

And you extend that into the post dismissal period. That's the analysis you have to make, which is the case of the facts inextricably intertwined. Is the law clear on this issue? … The district court was not writing on a clean didn't have to write on a clean slate. Instead of the abstract principle that well, there's distinctions between the two torts.

Oral argument — System Fuels, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

Then I withdraw that comment. But you know what, since you've offered, any objection, anybody to consolidating it? I couldn't see why it wasn't. Okay, very good. Then it's consolidated. … This is the one that pertains to the past six-year period. That is also correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — System Fuels, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

Then I withdraw that comment. But you know what, since you've offered, any objection, anybody to consolidating it? I couldn't see why it wasn't. Okay, very good. Then it's consolidated. … This is the one that pertains to the past six-year period. That is also correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2026

Clarifying question about the Natural Gas Act. Two different time periods, complaint to order to, and then order to final order. In the Natural Gas Act, can FERC order refunds for the first period? … Louisiana Commission does cite a case from 2022 American Clean Power where the Commission was required to consider new evidence on remand.

Oral argument — United States v. Julio Alvarado Dubon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2025

the uh to the consent with respect to the protective sweep your honor my time is running I'll try to get to that very briefly there's no difference between consent and a truly consent it's a consent period … would hope they would judge i'm sure they would i practice law in richmond for a long time criminal defense work and i don't think the richmond's finest as they call them would just do that well i won't comment

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Pardee

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013

And in our brief, we acknowledge that we are on plain air. Though I would say this. This is not a case where either Mr. Pardee or counsel simply let these statements pass unchallenged. … Your Honor, let me first begin by referencing some comments made by appellate's counsel. First, Judge Niemeyer, you are correct in regards to the description of the video. Mr.