Documents

Oral argument — Orujyan v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

Well, the immigration judge does allude and make some comments that perhaps there may be some ineffective counsel issues. … Was he acting, O'Janian, your client, acting in the role of a lawyer?

Oral argument — United States v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2022

I mean, that's the purpose of the act. But to Judge Rendell's point, the act requires that the FBAR be filed, correct? The act requires that the FBAR be filed, that's correct. … During this period of time, the relevant period, 2007, 2008, a couple years thereafter, was he living outside the United States or was he living in Cranberry?

Oral argument — 1-17-2058

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2020

The state produced no evidence of any prior acts of violence by Joseph, or of any conflicts between he and his mother. … He came up with an explanation that he was cleaning gutters and that's how this stuff happened, and maybe he was just scratching his neck, but there was other, that is also circumstantial evidence that

Oral argument — Richard Bell v. Wilmott Storage Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2020

The – in Ober versus Whitman, 243-3-1190, where the de minimis concept was used to make minor variations in connection with the Clean Water Act. … But I – that's just a comment I wanted to make. The server test that has been discussed by Mr.

Oral argument — Andrew Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates IIPC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2018

And that's based on the comments, the official comments to Regulations V and the Federal Reserve Board's statements, interpretations going all the way back to 1977. … I don't think it is because the court had in front of it the Braith versus Ball opinion and the Federal Reserve Board comments. And the Federal Reserve Board comments are also almost right on point.

Oral argument — United States v. Darrell Gillespie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2022

It was argued to the jury that conspiracy was sufficient based upon your comments, Judge Neumeier. We now know that that is insufficient. … Therefore, in question 11, they refer back to count one of the indictment, which only says conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, period, paragraph.

Oral argument — Chultem v. Ticor Title Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015

And one of the questions was, or comments was, I think it was limited in scope. … Because that makes it a regulation and that makes it effectively incorporated into the Illinois Title Insurance Act.

Oral argument — Burleson v. Collin Cty Cmty Coll Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2021

Jackson Public School District, which says the loss of First Amendment freedoms, even for minimal periods, constitutes irreparable injury. Or R.A.V. v. City of St. … And so those reasons are all independent of the trial court's stated reasons, and this court, if it were to decide to find the court aired on 1983, should affirm the summary judgment motion for any one

Oral argument — Kelley v. O'Malley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

And Officer Hawn also says, I heard the gunfire and I saw the guy with, the bad guy with the dog in the air. So the dog is up in the air and Kelly is fighting with the dog when he shot. … Hahn testifying that the dog was in the air when shots were fired.

Oral argument — Jean Shrem v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018

So the customer goes in there with an expectation that they have a 12-month reusable fund period from the date of the purchase of the ticket. … The Air Carrier Access Act, other things, that to the extent those regulations change, then the airline has to follow those regulations even if their contract is different.

Oral argument — United States v. Swick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2025

for any period of time during which he was not in fact under probationary supervision by virtue of his own wrongful acts. … You were listening to my comments to your opposing counsel. It seems to me tolling means that you're extending the time period in which something is to be accomplished and when other words might go.

Oral argument — United States v. James Murphy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2018

The three under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act under Title 18 were all directly tied to the false claims that the defendant was convicted of. … And the defendants filed sort of revised taxes late in the investigation when they were trying to sort of come clean.

Oral argument — Yassin Aref v. Loretta Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2016

That's correct, although I will note that administrative segregation can also go on for a very significant period of time. … Is the court just supposed to defer to that period?

Oral argument — Alejandro Jorge-Chavelas v. Louisiana Farm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

Lumar was hired to clean the Zapp's potato chip factory by Aramark. Aramark was retained by Zapp's. … It's liable for their acts. And the same limitations that apply to Aramark also are applicable to its employees.

Oral argument — United States v. Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2021

the Assimilating Crimes Act and Indian Major Crimes Act to the penalties provided in Chapter 227. … To address that question, that's the harmless air question. Mr Cohen pointed out.

Oral argument — Helena Agri-Enterprises LLC v. Great Lakes Grain LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2021

you're afraid they're playing your honor so one thing i want to address in your question was the the point about reasonably equivalent value or fair market value and that's a point that the district court aired … when it was reviewing the brief or the briefing in this case when we turn to mcl 566.38 it explains the defenses that are available in avoidable transfer case and the district court aired by applying

Oral argument — Mary Williams v. Julio Aviles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2025

Aviles, doing business as Universal Air Dock Services and Frederick Mutual Insurance Company. Ms. Williams for the appellant, Ms. Carson for the appellees. Good morning, Ms. Williams. … Corson argues on my behalf always, as opposed to the experts, I did have two experts named within the disclosure period.

Oral argument — US Airways, Inc., for American

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018

Air has its own platform. You could call up U.S. Air and book a flight directly. They have their own platform. But in the plaintiff's market definition, that's not in their market. … That's not the way juries act.

Oral argument — Ripa v. Stony Brook University

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2020

There may be a missing of the time period. The missing of the time period hasn't impaired the defendant's rights. … So the I just don't want to use but I think when you take them together that this condition cannot simply constitute clean error or abuse of discretion by the district judge.

Oral argument — Michael Shreffler v. City of Kankakee

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2023

In 2016, in February of 2016, Michael Shreffler made some comments on a Facebook post that were about a halftime show of the Super Bowl involving Beyonce and the comments were in poor taste but they were … Both of those, both Dumas and Shreffler were reprimanded for their comments and that was a different supervisor? That's correct. Okay.