Documents

Oral argument — Vail v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

Yes, the intervener has allowed, since the mother entered rehab and is clean, for her to stay overnight. … So she was on drugs during that time period. She admits she was on drugs during that time period, and in April of 2017 is when she became missing for months on end. So that mischaracterizes that.

Oral argument — ArcelorMittal v. AK Steel Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016

In the district court's words below, they want a clean slate. Pretend no jury trial occurred, the appeals haven't occurred. … Even if only reissue claims 24 and 25 remain, there is evidence that those claims were infringed during the time period at issue in the 050 case.

Oral argument — Alyse Sanchez v. Kristi Noem

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026

It seemed like sometimes the district court was saying the problem here is that an immigrant is removed during the application process, period. … This is the tradition of the Fourth Circuit, and then we write on a clean slate to try to resolve the issues. We thank you both for your arguments.

Oral argument — John Vernile v. Pacifica Foundation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2023

Vernile was hired by Pacifica as an interim executive director for a six-month period. … Six weeks after he became the ED, he took the New York station, WBAI, off the air without a vote of the executive board.

Oral argument — People v. Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2014

Now, on this appeal, the criminal charge has been cleaned up for that. Now, on this appeal, NVAC informed this court after what I guess I would call a re-run of the proceedings in Peoria County. … The comment on the study was that nothing works in the Juvenile Department of Justice.

Oral argument — Lee v. GNC Franchising, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2003

I understand you're sort of going, that's some of the theories under the Copperwell Doctrine and the Robinson-Patman and the Sherman Act that they can't conspire. … And I think under the theory that the parties are going to have a clean slate in going forward and dealing with one another.

Oral argument — Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2021

It can't be quite as clean as was suggested. You have to spend time doing paperwork and processing and making decisions about it, right? Yeah. … That somehow violates the Act in order, by our compliance with the Act and treating everybody equally. We treat everyone the same, including ourselves, and therefore we violate the Act.

Oral argument — Chultem v. Ticor Title Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015

And one of the questions was, or comments was, I think it was limited in scope. … Because that makes it a regulation and that makes it effectively incorporated into the Illinois Title Insurance Act.

Oral argument — Plastic Omnium Advanced v. Donghee America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2019

You have your cutter has to be in the open air, period. And this is ultimately the classic question. … And you haven't given me an answer to the open air rationale. So let me focus on what Dr.

Oral argument — Anthony Daunt v. Jocelyn Benson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2021

It wasn't a burden that we pulled out of thin air. It was the burden they alleged in the complaint. And it was that burden that this court found to be not severe. … And so, you know, in deciding what is the appropriate period of time, there is that Supreme Court precedent, there's the precedent that a two year period is de minimis.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Coates

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2020

And while I have more to say on the subject, I'd like to give time for questions, and I may be able to get my other comments in during that period. Thank you. Justice Hudson, your questions, please. … I'm sorry, can you address the argument that the court aired and not considering all sources of income from Robert for Robert when he reset and recalculated the maintenance award?

Oral argument — Martin Kipp v. Ron Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2019

There's no reason to clean it up. He, in essence, said he commented that he killed these victims and that Satan was licking them up and laughing at them. … They're really distinct, and, and this, this, uh, Satan wasn't pulled out of thin air and wasn't pulled out of, um, the Bible or brought up by, by a juror.

Oral argument — Aime Gressett v. CAWCD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

And it was formed as a district to satisfy the requirements of federal law, and that is the Colorado River Basin Project Act. The Basin Project Act required that... … It goes on to say that the Commonwealth Port Authority, quote, acts for the state.

Oral argument — Saint Anthony Hospital v. Elizabeth M. Whitehorn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2024

Pay, clean claims, within 30 days, 90% of clean claims must be paid, and 99% within 90 days. … Could I finish this one comment, if I may? Your Honor, thank you. The district court said that's not what the statute says at all.

Oral argument — Edward Breiner v. Nevada Department of Correctio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2010

And I believe some may have come over, but basically they cleaned house. And they certainly cleaned house with the management positions, including the lieutenant and on up. … And if you're fortunate enough to have a fourth, they can act as a reserve that will help out for things such as leave and days off.

Oral argument — McKeon Products Incorporated v. Howard S Leight Associates

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021

In TWM, a case cited by Honeywell in their reply, when they looked at even after the statutory period ran, there was no presumption of latches. There is no delay-focused latches. … What we're talking about here is there has to be an affirmative sort of act by McKeon, and the district court judge looked at that.

Oral argument — Security Alarm Financing v. Alarm Protection Technology

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2018

The Alaska Trade Secrets Act, as to which there was no evidence of a loss resulting from an alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. And third, the Lanham Act requires causation. … be high periods of cancellation.

Oral argument — United States v. Terrance Machen

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2014

The indictment is for RICO conspiracy, which alleges that whole time period. The government didn't have to prove or even allege overt acts in the indictment to have a sufficient indictment. … The government, yes, did not have to prove overt acts per 1962D. This is a RICO-spanning majority.

Oral argument — Bradley v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2016

With the Court's permission, I would like to address the Appellant's 34-Act Claims. Mr. Pazduszynski would address the 33-Act Claims. I would just start just because I noted it. … And therefore, there is no basis under the 1933 Act for a disclosure claim.

Oral argument — Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

Thus, nothing could have been washed clean. There was nothing there to wash clean. They didn't even consider it later on. … So there was nothing to wash clean. There was no washing, simply no washing, clean or otherwise. Mr. Franklin, this characterized what I said before.