Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.39s
Oral argument — Fernando Zavala v. Terri Gonzalez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2013
As for Respondent's comments here, I apologize, I realize that there was a substantive portion of Mr. … Cefalla was claiming he didn't actually do these acts or not, that there were enough other witnesses to say, yes, he was ranting and raving and saying these things and firing guns into the air, that any
19 min of audioOral argument — People v. Casas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2016
So you're saying it wasn't a single instantaneous act to be performed at a given time. Exactly, Your Honor. It's a continuing offense. … Okay, so they aired on that rationale. What else – where – how else did they air in their analysis in Grogan? Well, the – the Grogan court didn't fully look at the statute.
26 min of audioOral argument — Highland Captl Mgmt Fund v. Highland Captl Mgmt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2024
And again, as I've conceded, we do not write on a clean slate, although I'll talk a little bit about law of the case later. … It applies to things like gross negligence, bad faith, intentional acts.
41 min of audioOral argument — Adam Backhaut v. Apple Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017
This Court in Conop construed definitively this in-transmission requirement and said the wiretap act applies to the acquisition of a communication while it's in the air at the speed of light. … And, again, so they aren't able to locate an actual transmission where the message is kind of plucked out of the air and acquired by someone.
30 min of audioOral argument — McClain v. Delgado
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2024
There's a portion on the video where you see him looking at an air raid card, which is a document that officers have to help them determine if somebody is intoxicated or not, for example. … We're not going to comment on if the plaintiff could, only that he did not meet his burden in that case. And because Mr.
42 min of audioOral argument — B.T. Trucking v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2011
You could also not have an employee handbook that doesn't voice requirements on you in terms of your appearance and to conduct yourself in a business-like manner and to be clean. … He actually worked solely for BT for a significant period of time, seven years, wasn't it? Yes, sir. Yes, sir.
24 min of audioOral argument — People v. Schag
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2019
now, he raises one issue, and that is whether his post-conviction petition established that the appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue that the circuit court violated to the Clean … Her denial of consent to sexual acts with others and her withdrawing her consent to sexual acts with defendants specifically.
27 min of audioOral argument — Reya Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2014
What about a discreet act? Let me ask you that. What would be your analysis under discreet act? … two were engaged in in probably a 15-hour period.
90 min of audioOral argument — First Heights Bank v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007
So it was merely commenting on the conduct that occurred in that case and its relevance to the common fund exception. … There's always a period in which people anticipate litigation, but it hasn't yet arisen.
73 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Richard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2007
The judge's comments are 281 of the record. And I don't think I need to repeat those. … Doesn't our recent panel decision that we asked you to comment say just that?
42 min of audioOral argument — King-Knight v. City of New York
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2026
Well, the alleged lies by Officer Geary, how do we know—when you say they were aired— I mean, there was—I think— The taint question was aired. The taint question was aired. … of public policy because it would frustrate Congress' purpose in enacting the False Claims Act.
52 min of audioOral argument — Affordable Recovery Housing v. City of Blue Island
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2017
Are they up in the air or what? … Do you have any comment on that? No, I think, unfortunately, the attorneys didn't...
39 min of audioOral argument — Martin v. Arrow Electronics
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2009
Adario's report and saw that comment that they're now relying on, they didn't ask to continue the trial. They didn't ask to reopen discovery. … Adario about that note, and he felt like he needed to come clean, if you want to use that terminology, to the jury and explain what was going on.
34 min of audioOral argument — In re Estate of Pellico
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2014
So I think that when the ward died in November of 2006, there were about $35,000 in fees that involved the period before her death. … Any other comments? No. I have one. All right. I'll say something, and then you can think in the background as to whether or not you have any further comments. All right.
41 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Norman Garcia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2013
Because the defense started with the lesser-included instruction, I'll start my comments there as well. First of all, with due respect to counsel, I believe that he misstates the holding in Keeble. … The defense argued that he acted accidentally in the act that comprised the assault in this case. Even the lesser-included requires an intentional act.
26 min of audioOral argument — Ronald Barton v. Constellium Rolled Products
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017
But remember, this is a collective bargaining agreement, and these are governed by the National Labor Relations Act. … But in this case, it's not a clean inference. Well, neither are the inferences you're asking us to draw about the impact of the cap language.
36 min of audioOral argument — WOOD v. DOLLAR RENT-A-CAR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2005
There are ageist comments from Sousa, his supervisor, ageist comments from Pax and the President, ageist comments. … All that we ask as the appellant is for a reversal and a remand so we could have the full airing. Let me ask you this.
37 min of audioOral argument — Eileen Race v. George Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2022
She was clean when she went to the hospital. When she went to the hospital, when they finally let her go to the hospital, she was clean. … If that was the reason why they didn't act.
33 min of audioOral argument — John Doe v. Oberlin College
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019
They can bring a lawyer who can't act as a lawyer but can act as an advisor. So this student had the opportunity to pick anybody that he wanted at page 33 of the policy. … I mean, I know it gets a lot of air time, but go ahead with what you want. I don't fully disagree, Your Honor.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jordan Bowers
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2026
And in our view, the district court did not clearly air in finding that the defendant did not act in self-defense. A couple of important facts from the record to put on the table here. … And even if, um, this court may or may not have decided the issue differently in the first instance, uh, under the clear air air standard, we think that any error here certainly was not clear.
29 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.