Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Chico Martines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2014

There was also air conditioning. There was talk about the extent of the utilities, how the utility bills had gone up to over $1,000 a month. … She was the acting supervisor that day, and she took the pictures of the different plants and the different stages and how they were spread out in the supplement.

Oral argument — United States v. Victor Ortiz Alvarez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 2, 2020

Stokes, wasn't it common for an outside firm to be hired to clean up where they found the meth lab? Wasn't that pretty common? … Here we have a PSR that specifically noted the acetone, specifically cited the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and that there was a violation of that act.

Oral argument — Hahn v. McElroy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2023

And the representative from Advancing Clean who did the mold remediation testified that he believed people living in the home would have noticed the mold. … In this case, the trial court made some comments to me about the failure to settle on a weak case.

Oral argument — People v. Brock

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2018

The act, I think that's the problem here. What act are we discussing? Here, the act was penetration. Well, that's what you're saying. That was the state's theory of the case, Your Honor. … We appreciate your comments. Ms. Gaston? Good morning. May it please the Court, Counsel, Chelsea Gaston on behalf of the state.

Oral argument — United States v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2016

Are we on plain air review in this case? It's plain air review in this case because the issue of Johnson and anything with respect to 924c3b was not raised below. … And the reason why we don't think that's possible is these crimes, this is not a situation in which different parts of it occurred at different periods of time.

Oral argument — Jamesv.Sutliff Saturn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

As far as a detailing shop, Your Honor, I think you may be aware that certain car buffs out there like to have their cars pretty clean. … That's an awfully long period of time.

Oral argument — Sony Electronics v. Guardian Media

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2007

Your Honor, if you're asking me do I think we should remand the case, based on the comments on the re-examination, I would say no. … So clearly, Your Honor, you do attribute the conduct to the predecessor, because if you didn't do that, it would be like wiping the slate clean, and you would start over.

Oral argument — Ameranth, Inc. v. Agilsys, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

Thus, nothing could have been washed clean. There was nothing there to wash clean. They didn't even consider it later on. … So there was nothing to wash clean. There was no washing, simply no washing, clean or otherwise. Mr. Franklin, this characterized what I said before.

Oral argument — L'Association des Americains Accidentels v. DOS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

Well, I have two comments. … So, if I can clarify that, Your Honor, so there are, of course, seven voluntary acts listed under 1481. That's the section of the INA that governs and acts of to lose citizenship.

Oral argument — Hejran Hejrat Co. LTD v. US Army Corps of Engineers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2019

I mean, the entire, from the contract cleaning case analysis, there are no magic words, there's no particular formula. … It's Contract Cleaning Maintenance v. United States.

Oral argument — In re: DAVIS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2019

I guess this is more of a comment than a question, but it does seem to me like your client dodged a pretty big bullet here, and there is a point at which error can be clear. I mean. Well, not here. … I am struck by the numerosity of the points, and is cleaning it up later sufficient?

Oral argument — United States v. Tseng

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

Lee if she's standing right next to him during that time period. The sheer volume of calls lends credibility to the fact that, to Mr. … All I would say is I believe the testimony was – Can't you run a good, clean trial down there? We do our best, Your Honor. We do. I don't see that here.

Oral argument — Erica Bojicic v. Richard DeWine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2022

To just say we're treated differently, period. Your Honor, we were admonished and told that we were going to get a show cause order, no matter why we should not be. … Your Honor, what we're saying here is if we don't have the opportunity, if people can't say the government's acting in bad faith, they're acting in bad faith.

Oral argument — Pennzoil-Quaker State v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2007

The taxpayer said, well, in that case, what happened is the taxpayer paid costs in the current years to clean up past contamination, and it was the same theory. … Number two has to do, I think you can categorize it as nexus, and that is in Reynolds in the earlier period, Reynolds didn't have any relationship with its payees in the later period.

Oral argument — Center for the Study of Serv. v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2017

Even after, on administrative appeal, the Secretary of the Air Force had said that documents can't be withheld, Air Force officers continued to withhold them. … And we anticipate that the agency has to act in good faith.

Oral argument — Paul Morrissey v. Chad Wolf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

However, both of these plaintiffs have an interest in airing their case in court and have it in being heard and in, hopefully, holding the government responsible for that discrimination. … But when the period was 120 days, the plaintiff there, I believe, was in the Southern District of Iowa. It was in the Iowa District Court.

Oral argument — People v. Bowman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2026

In this case, the case law, the statute itself, the instructions, and the committee comments all support the People's position. … The two IPIs that are clearly required are 727 and 728, and both of those require causation. 715, actually nothing in the committee comments.

Oral argument — Treadway v. Otero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2024

Otero only withheld her passport for a one-week period. … Well, actually, the bulk of that opinion talks about the idea that the Traffic Victim Protection Act is different, as she says, from the Labor Standards Act.

Oral argument — Richard Samson v. Western Capital Partners, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

But the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act defines what an asset is for purposes of execution and for analysis under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, and that's all property of the debtor that's not exempt … Your Honor, I missed your comment. No, I was only getting you used the term fairness earlier on, right? I used the term fairness? Or fair. Yes.

Oral argument — United States v. Anfernee Rondeau

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026

The first is the sufficiency of the evidence argument that the government failed to prove the requisite sexual act. … Where does your argument fit in on the plain air analysis? I would tend to agree with your earlier comments that really St. Clair isn't categorical.