Documents

Oral argument — Ricardo Cruz-Calmo v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2022

With respect to the PSG determination, the agency, an immigration judge, acted within his considerable discretion when he found that petitioner's drunk driving offense in 2015 amounted to a particular … But what he found was that whatever it was, your client was able to avoid it for over a month during a period when he was in hiding and he viewed that as substantial evidence that if he went, if he was

Oral argument — Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. Newton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2019

then you have a complete contradiction and you have read the statute in a very bizarre way, because ordinarily what the Secretary is doing is reading the word applicable Federal law to decide does the Clean … Air Act apply.

Oral argument — Nafziger v. Board of Education of Staunton Community Unit School District No. 6

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2019

This did clean up an issue across the state, but it also was a monumental change. … Judge Deal, the trial court, deserves defense if this court has to comment on how many times she was evaluated, because that's a fact.

Oral argument — United States v. Samory Monds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2019

I don't read Judge Gritzner's comment as he wasn't exercising his discretion. … But that sort of colloquy is good evidence that the district judge understood he was acting within his discretion. I want to focus just a bit on this question of the closing argument that Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Leung

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2004

And I agree that if we were, if this Court were riding on a clean slate, it's clear from your dissent in Campos that you would find differently than the state of the lie is. … Your Honor, just a few comments about Murillo. I don't agree with counsel's interpretation of Murillo. I don't think that it expanded the law or that it added anything new.

Oral argument — Rebecca Snoeyenbos v. Marcia Curtis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

It's not a plein air standard of review because we're not challenging the jury's ruling as to the evidence. … It said a specific intended act of expression, not a specified harm. And there's a substantial difference between specified harm and specific intended act of expression. Who specifies the harm?

Oral argument — Tschiggfrie Properties, Ltd. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

Really, they've got a clean, clean record and they're proud of it. They work with the Teamsters, laborers, operators, and the Carpenters Union. … We act like you're supposed to look at five factors. Are you familiar with our case? Yes. Yes. And we act like there's not a per se rule in this circuit. What do you say? Right.

Oral argument — Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Ryan Zinke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

And at what point would interested parties like your client be able to comment on the Endangered Species Act part of it? … It's directly in the response to comments. What did you say? It wasn't very much.

Oral argument — Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

Are you saying that they're separate acts, or that together they're an act of infringement? Or does it make any difference in your argument? They are two acts of infringement. … So along, you're consuming various amounts of liquid en route to what I hope and imagine is a completely clean colon.

Oral argument — ChampionX v. AIG Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

or the Texas Act. … No new parties were added by that time period.

Oral argument — Hejran Hejrat Co. LTD v. US Army Corps of Engineers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2019

I mean, the entire, from the contract cleaning case analysis, there are no magic words, there's no particular formula. … It's Contract Cleaning Maintenance v. United States.

Oral argument — Adees Corp. v. Avis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2005

One is refueling the cars, one is cleaning the cars, and one is shuttling the cars. … A year and a half, which is quite a bit more than the six-month statutory period. They're gone now, though, is that right? They are gone now.

Oral argument — Arzu v. American Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2026

Applying Air France v. … Accordingly, the flight crew's ability to respond was limited by the short time period in which it had to act and by the need to ensure the safety of other passengers and crew.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013

And if he had been a patient by a couple more weeks, uh, he would have had the new, uh, uh, the Fair Sentencing Act would have been, uh, enacted. … Okay, finally, plain air.

Oral argument — United States v. Flores

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2024

It was some period of time after they left it that this chase began. So arguably that creates a factual difference that makes this not quite as clean a case of escape as the prior cases. … They don't have to act with intent that they're committing a robbery. They have to act with intent that they're committing the acts that constitute a robbery.

Oral argument — People v. Downs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2014

They suggest this is a possibly better answer, and the Supreme Court doesn't act on it. … And ultimately, I think his dissent in Franklin is about the trial judge should refrain from making such comments.

Oral argument — First Heights Bank v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

So it was merely commenting on the conduct that occurred in that case and its relevance to the common fund exception. … There's always a period in which people anticipate litigation, but it hasn't yet arisen.

Oral argument — Covenant Medical Center Inc v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2014

C appears in the Act. The Act modifies a whole bunch of different sections in the Social Security Act. Where do I, I can't find C in the codified version of the ACA. Where is it? It was not codified. … Now, we've since revised the regulations to clean that up, but there have been courts that have said that in some instances – We have the Monmouth case, but there's nothing else that would otherwise suggest

Oral argument — EMINENCE CAPITAL v. ASPEON, INC.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2006

The order merges into our opinion and you go forward now with a clean slate back to comply with the opinion. Yes, Your Honor. … Then you have to amortize that over a period of time. You amortize that over the useful time and the period of the goodwill.

Oral argument — The Highview Group, Ltd. v. William Ryan Homes, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2019

You have to come with clean hands. Mr. Swerdow doesn't come with clean hands. He accused Mr. Ryan of stealing. That was his original, he had fraud case. … That was a period of about two weeks. And Mr. Swartow had been working on this project since 2010 for over four years. And Mr.