Documents

Oral argument — Diane Burke v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2021

That's just not present when a corporate officer is simply acting as an issuer of stock. … The company there appointed an independent fiduciary kind of long into the class period.

Oral argument — Carnahan v. Stepping

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2023

The trial court where I think the trial court aired is they found that first off, he didn't the 20 year statutory period doesn't begin until he learns that he owns the disputed parcel of land, which of … I think the trial court aired on those two principles of law. First off, the appellate never gave permission.

Oral argument — Duran Pichardov.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2012

Could you comment on Mr. Glenn's point that there had been a final determination so that he could not avail himself of 1447B? The only comment I can make. … However, all that's left is a ministerial act that does not involve the application of discretion.

Oral argument — Treadway v. Otero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2024

Otero only withheld her passport for a one-week period. … Well, actually, the bulk of that opinion talks about the idea that the Traffic Victim Protection Act is different, as she says, from the Labor Standards Act.

Oral argument — DirecTV, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2015

And in all of those cases, they make clear that the mere fact that conduct is prejudicial to an employer does not remove it from the act. That's not consistent with the way the act is structured. … Just looking at the facts of this case, the board points to the fact that it's undisputed that the employees did not have a chance to see the TV program before it was aired.

Oral argument — Jeffrey Harper v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020

that period say the specificity requirement isn't that we don't understand what you're what you're asking for? … What's your comment? Well filing an amended return plus the correct form places us on notice that they are they want this refund based on this section of the statute.

Oral argument — Ameranth, Inc. v. Agilsys, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

Thus, nothing could have been washed clean. There was nothing there to wash clean. They didn't even consider it later on. … So there was nothing to wash clean. There was no washing, simply no washing, clean or otherwise. Mr. Franklin, this characterized what I said before.

Oral argument — Marcel Eluhu v. Dept of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2019

But even if you're correct on that, don't we still have the question whether the reason for the discharge is because your client was not at his post multiple times over a course of a period where he was … I wanted to make a couple of other comments.

Oral argument — Teresa Sykes v. Cook Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2023

No minimum amount of physical injury is required and the comments provide the example of a scratch to the bumper of a car, which is sufficient for injury. … And it discussed that there the allegation was that there was impact on some small number of air sacs within the lung.

Oral argument — United States v. James Snyder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023

But here, just the general notion that's put forth in some of the cases relied upon by the defense and in some of the comments, early comments made by the district court, that there's almost a presumption … He was into the statutory period, well into the statutory period, continuing to run his affairs through SRC.

Oral argument — Prime Healthcare Services, Inc v. SEIU

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2016

, wipe the slate clean, and then went on as sort of the fact finder, finding their own interpretation of what these isolated facts were. … What happened in that period? You start seeing acts where the union and Kaiser are acting against their own interest.

Oral argument — United States v. Dwayne Frazier

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

Frazier over that extended period and could see Mr. Frazier deteriorate. … All of his urinalyses were clean. Then, during the Rule 11 college- I think that helps your case. I think it does. That he's acting crazy, but he's not taking illegal drugs.

Oral argument — United States v. Lopez-Velasquez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2008

But the fact is that the determination of the starting date was up in the air in 1994. … And to show that it's lawful, there is a section enacted by Congress that said during that period he could not be deported, during that period he had a right to get work permits, during that period he

Oral argument — United States v. Darrell Gillespie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2022

It was argued to the jury that conspiracy was sufficient based upon your comments, Judge Neumeier. We now know that that is insufficient. … Therefore, in question 11, they refer back to count one of the indictment, which only says conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, period, paragraph.

Oral argument — United States v. Randolph Forrest

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2025

That restitution, of course, was pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, which Congress enacted for a very specific purpose. … If I could finish my comment.

Oral argument — United States v. Abraham Fisch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017

He had to act corruptly, and he had to act with specific intent to commit obstruction of justice, which dispels any legitimate or bona fide representation when you're acting corruptly. … It would be under plain air review.

Oral argument — People v. Hunter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2022

And so I guess in a similar way, proof of a prior bad act, we have to prove that the act is bad in some way, Your Honor. … It's almost as if you're helping him build in air.

Oral argument — United States v. Swick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2025

for any period of time during which he was not in fact under probationary supervision by virtue of his own wrongful acts. … You were listening to my comments to your opposing counsel. It seems to me tolling means that you're extending the time period in which something is to be accomplished and when other words might go.

Oral argument — Hahn v. McElroy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2023

And the representative from Advancing Clean who did the mold remediation testified that he believed people living in the home would have noticed the mold. … In this case, the trial court made some comments to me about the failure to settle on a weak case.

Oral argument — United States v. Chico Martines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2014

There was also air conditioning. There was talk about the extent of the utilities, how the utility bills had gone up to over $1,000 a month. … She was the acting supervisor that day, and she took the pictures of the different plants and the different stages and how they were spread out in the supplement.