Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.54s

  • Oral argument — Jeffrey Harper v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020

    that period say the specificity requirement isn't that we don't understand what you're what you're asking for? … What's your comment? Well filing an amended return plus the correct form places us on notice that they are they want this refund based on this section of the statute.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Estate of Blonstein v. Hamil Property Partnership

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2011

    Although, I still want to get to my second answer, but to answer that comment that the court made. This is a case of unjust enrichment by the defendant. … No, he did not admit he was a broker, and this also relates to the comment that the court made at the end of the argument by opposing counsel.

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jack Kellison v. Dutra Group

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018

    And under the Longshore Act, and under Section 7 of the Administrative Act, the Administrative Procedures Act, and Greenwich Collieries, the true doubt rule was removed. … Also, that claimant didn't come forward with any evidence themselves of air testing or other proof of an injurious exposure situation.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Groff v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2007

    Groff and the state of California that makes his acts not the acts of the state of California, but the acts of his employer, San Joaquin Helicopters. Mr. … We, notice and comment exists for a reason.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Russell Country Sportsmen v. USFS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

    Did he just make that up out of thin air? Well, what Judge Haddon did is he ruled on this as a matter of law. … But on the NEPA issue, I guess the issue there really boils down to whether and when the Forest Service can modify an alternative after the close of the comment period without having to prepare an entirely

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Randolph Forrest

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2025

    That restitution, of course, was pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, which Congress enacted for a very specific purpose. … If I could finish my comment.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Estate of Gawel

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

    There is a section in the Probate Act for reopening estates that have been closed, decedent estates, but it does not apply to realigning the heirs. … But nothing was being done for that six-month period. It's not just the fact that, you know, there are other attorneys handling the case during that period of time.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — B.T. Trucking v. Workers' Compensation Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2011

    You could also not have an employee handbook that doesn't voice requirements on you in terms of your appearance and to conduct yourself in a business-like manner and to be clean. … He actually worked solely for BT for a significant period of time, seven years, wasn't it? Yes, sir. Yes, sir.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — KATZ-PUESCHEL v. TRANSPORTATION

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

    Back pay is, as the court knows, a term of art provided for by the Back Pay Act, which allows somebody in Ms. … They've said that since the air traffic control strikes.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nafziger v. Board of Education of Staunton Community Unit School District No. 6

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2019

    This did clean up an issue across the state, but it also was a monumental change. … Judge Deal, the trial court, deserves defense if this court has to comment on how many times she was evaluated, because that's a fact.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rhead v. Mundy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

    And they took me to the fire station instead of the hospital first and cleaned me up and then took me to the hospital. And they were also, they never Mirandized me. … We appreciate your comments. You have two minutes left, so if you'd like to have a seat while you're on the other side. Okay, I will. Mr. Reed, why don't you have a seat at the counsel table? Mr.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Cliff Mosco v. Motricity Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

    So roughly I'm going to try to leave him around five minutes to back clean up. So are you prepared to talk about the registration statement? I am, Your Honor. All right. … I'd like to start with the IPO comments first. I agree that Your Honor should look at exactly what was said, and what you'll see is it's not a statement that referred to the time of the IPO.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Smith v. Becerra

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2022

    notice and comment provision specific to the Medicare Act. … Because what concerns me is there's lots of things up in the air here. And a lot of them seem really speculative to me.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rashid Minhas

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2016

    He's not just pulling out of the air. … I think that is a complete misreading of the transcript and the judge's comments, Your Honor.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shields v. McDonald

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2016

    I have a comment. I understand Mr. … But I think his underlying concern is articulated by the requirement that the VA act in a veteran-friendly fashion, and there's a reason for that.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carnahan v. Stepping

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2023

    The trial court where I think the trial court aired is they found that first off, he didn't the 20 year statutory period doesn't begin until he learns that he owns the disputed parcel of land, which of … I think the trial court aired on those two principles of law. First off, the appellate never gave permission.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Diane Burke v. The Boeing Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2021

    That's just not present when a corporate officer is simply acting as an issuer of stock. … The company there appointed an independent fiduciary kind of long into the class period.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Figaro-Benjamin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2023

    You need to help me clean this up. So he's directing the individuals that you have to come here. … Calling someone makes you part of the criminal act. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, counsel. That concludes argument in this case.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Abada v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2022

    For example, there was no decision maker who made an adverse comment. Where is the linkage here? … It had made discriminatory comments. The decision maker, him or herself? The decision maker themselves? No. No.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union v. Mine Safety and Health Administration

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2019

    In other words, if you can use an analogy to I have my house cleaned, it is thoroughly cleaned, but it is also dusted. It is also mopped. … They are able to avoid recording certain hazards as long as they're corrected within a quick period of time.

    38 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.