Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Richard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2007

The judge's comments are 281 of the record. And I don't think I need to repeat those. … Doesn't our recent panel decision that we asked you to comment say just that?

Oral argument — People v. Zimmerman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2010

And the fact that there are many more situations where the legislature meant it to be a sentence enhancement shows that the legislature is acting carefully in that regard. … that includes some elements and some sentence enhancements, according to the committee comments.

Oral argument — In re: Iconix International Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025

It doesn't focus on these after-the-fact acts. … An offense happens over a fixed period of time. Maybe a moment in time, maybe over five years. But there's sort of a before, during, and after.

Oral argument — United States v. Gregory Berry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

In the district court's word, the district court was concerned that he was trying to game the system, essentially build air into the proceedings. … He had three attorneys in an eight- to nine-month period. What about the fact that the court itself vacillated?

Oral argument — 35574 Sletteland v. Blendu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2004

During the period, after the period of time it was stayed, we began discovery, and we deposed Mr. Blendew. And after I deposed Mr. Blendew, I moved to the court to allow to amend the complaint. … I'll just – most of this will be addressed to the comments of Mr. Troutmate. With regard to the last one, first of all, I don't understand why Mr.

Oral argument — In Re: SageCrest II LLC and Sa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2019

And it relied upon principles of a case called Sound Air, which is a Canadian case, which talks about the integrity of the process. … So counsel's comments today that the bid would have been higher is based upon facts not in the record and facts which were never proven.

Oral argument — Brian Newton v. Parker Drilling Mgmt. Svcs.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

Or meal periods. Okay. … Supreme Court held that OXLA does not apply for that time period where they're commuting from the shore. So that answers that question.

Oral argument — Adam U. Steines v. Westgate Palace, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2024

Over a period of two years in a building, in one of 207 apartments in the building. That's correct, Your Honor. … Well, I'm not paying it off over an extended period of time because I basically I have it for an extended period of time. I have access for one week every other year for an extended period of time.

Oral argument — Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Ocwen Financial Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022

So what exactly then did Ocwen buy in this interim period? … It provides that ACWA has to kind of keep its nose clean for the violation. The defined term is potential violation. And if it does that, then it's not subject to penalties.

Oral argument — Johnsonr v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005

This is not something that was promulgated according to the Magnuson Act rulemaking. It doesn't have the force of law. … The first sentence says, no major changes were made in the final rule due to comments received on the proposed rule. This change was not made due to comments. We know that.

Oral argument — Sea Trade Maritime Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2018

Wasn't the determination of the court of first instance in Greece on appeal during that period of time? It was being appealed. … Peters did doesn't count towards clean hands? Did or did not do? Well, Mr. Peters didn't do anything. He just continued to litigate his claim against Mr. Kutudantas for breach of fiduciary duty.

Oral argument — People v. Peterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015

Second, I want to turn to the Stacey's comments, also which were allowed in by the forfeiture by Warren doing doctor. … Not he cleaned up the scene. Not any of that. Drew killed Kathleen. Not even Drew said he killed Kathleen. It was totally inadmissible evidence.

Oral argument — Lawrence Jefferson v. GDCP Warden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2018

Well, I think when you look at the record as a whole, that you can't say no competent counsel would have acted as trial counsel did. … He just said, he made a comment that he didn't know. He was never confronted with it. He did say. An explanation. He had an explanation about the billing.

Oral argument — LaGloria Oil v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2007

If you have one concluding comment that you would like to make, we will give you back your couple of minutes of rebuttal time. If I could save a couple of minutes for rebuttal. … We actually offered to sell fuel to, say, Tinker Air Force Base in 1994. Pick your year. And in that year, however, in that particular solicitation, DESC set aside 10%.

Oral argument — People v. Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2014

And I think your job is to do a de novo review of that question, not a plein air review, a de novo review. … A long period of pre-incriminating response during the videotape where the detectives are providing misinformation to Mr. Jackson about everybody's told us that you've done it.

Oral argument — Progressive Gulf Ins v. Faehnrich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2008

Yeah, it's part question, part comment. I'm concerned about jurisdiction in this case, and I meant to get an order out before argument, but didn't. … The children had not stayed in the jurisdiction for a particular period of time, but had demonstrated a period of intent to remain in the jurisdiction.

Oral argument — United States v. Dwayne Frazier

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

Frazier over that extended period and could see Mr. Frazier deteriorate. … All of his urinalyses were clean. Then, during the Rule 11 college- I think that helps your case. I think it does. That he's acting crazy, but he's not taking illegal drugs.

Oral argument — Ronald Barton v. Constellium Rolled Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017

But remember, this is a collective bargaining agreement, and these are governed by the National Labor Relations Act. … But in this case, it's not a clean inference. Well, neither are the inferences you're asking us to draw about the impact of the cap language.

Oral argument — Ciara Vesey v. Envoy Air, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

And we'll move to our third case this morning, which is Ciara Vesey versus Envoy Air. All right, I see Ms. Aiken and Ms. Fiore, so you may proceed, Ms. Aikens. Thank you, Your Honor. … Massengarb's entirely inappropriate comments. Correct. Okay. Yes.

Oral argument — Gaudin v. Remis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2004

The wrongful act that is attacked as the symptom to the thing that has to be fixed is the habitual residence. … Any other questions or comments? Thank you, counsel, both of you, for your argument in this matter. The matter just argued will be submitted.