Documents

Oral argument — Darden v. Colbea Enterprises, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

The Wage Act provides for payment of earned wages within a six- to seven-day period. … It does speak to the Wage Act. I want you to think beyond that. How should we interpret wages earned in the Wage Act? If we're just starting from a clean slate.

Oral argument — State of New York v. United St

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

It's not a notice and comment rulemaking, and it is, even if it were a notice and comment rulemaking, they could change. … And I'm not saying that a court always has to act nationwide under Section 705, but it's authority that it has.

Oral argument — Adams and Associates, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

I understand that the time period for getting all this done was a very truncated time period. They had a Federal Government contract and so they had to make a lot of decisions very fast. … Again, this is because we're in that short time period, transition period, that they assisted in that interview, gave the information to Mr.

Oral argument — Lori Birckhead v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2019

That was an argument that the petitioners had raised in the comments on the EA. … Truly, this has been an issue that has been challenging to my agency for the two-year temporary period.

Oral argument — EEOC v. Propak Logistics, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014

EEOC acted reasonably when it filed this lawsuit. … You didn't appeal the latches determination and the district court rested its attorney's fee award on whether the EEOC acted unreasonably, page 10 of its order, acted unreasonably by initiating litigation

Oral argument — KATZ-PUESCHEL v. TRANSPORTATION

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

Back pay is, as the court knows, a term of art provided for by the Back Pay Act, which allows somebody in Ms. … They've said that since the air traffic control strikes.

Oral argument — United States v. Tommy Walker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2022

The district court did not clearly air when it found that the ends of justice demanded several continuances of Mr. … Nothing about that balancing act was clearly erroneous, and so this court should affirm. Do you agree that other trials were being conducted by other judges in the district during that period?

Oral argument — Duran Pichardov.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2012

Could you comment on Mr. Glenn's point that there had been a final determination so that he could not avail himself of 1447B? The only comment I can make. … However, all that's left is a ministerial act that does not involve the application of discretion.

Oral argument — United States v. Huerta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021

I mean, for clear air for air to be playing, it's got to be clear. Now the government, everything the government relies on, asks this court to make an inference that's not necessarily obvious at all. … So other than that, those are my only comments. Well, I believe we have your argument.

Oral argument — United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union v. Mine Safety and Health Administration

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2019

In other words, if you can use an analogy to I have my house cleaned, it is thoroughly cleaned, but it is also dusted. It is also mopped. … They are able to avoid recording certain hazards as long as they're corrected within a quick period of time.

Oral argument — Viraj Profiles Limited v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2017

The person there has acted somewhere contrary to law. Well, what do you think the ITC should have done? … When I've been involved in default cases in district courts and trial courts, they start clean. It doesn't matter what happened. They do what they did in Dow.

Oral argument — Northern New Mexico Stockman's v. United States Fish

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2022

effects that that don't stem from listing but stem from sort of the fact that the land um bears this particular um designation now i will acknowledge don't you don't you think don't you think it was it was air … immigration context this is not an enforcement case i think that kind of argument could potentially be relevant if there was sort of a particular enforcement action that was taken against someone in the period

Oral argument — Deborah Slayton v. Carolyn Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2015

This is a clean case. There is very little else involved. This is one issue, the claimant's credibility. The court has previously held in Carradine v. … Let me, well, moving on to the SSI information or time period, did any doctors opine or disagree with the residual functional capacity as found by the ALJ?

Oral argument — International Union v. Trane U.S. Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

There are two arbitrator acts that are at issue at this case. … And that's why we are within 90 days of the arbitrator's final act.

Oral argument — People v. Carter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2011

And so the issue is not as clean as it would be if there was no explanation, if it was just a statement contrary to a statement that had been made before without any explanation. … And finally, just one comment regarding the sentencing issue.

Oral argument — Service Employees Internationa v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 25, 2020

The case that they rely on primarily is the Air Force case from the D.C. Circuit, where there was an APA claim. But the court, the D.C. … It should have gone through notice and comment.

Oral argument — Bridget Gordon v. Deloitte and Touche, LLP Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

Is it, what act is it that breathed new life? Is it that letter? It is opening all of them together. The initial act is reopening the claim in response to the DOI complaint. … And at no time in that time period did MetLife ever say, your case is time barred.

Oral argument — United States v. Canty

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2022

What reasonable probability means may be up in the air. But that's the standard that is actually a little different than the way the First Circuit has recited it. … So what's the benefit that the others get out of Canty having a four-month period overlapped in the same sales locations? Well, I would say two things.

Oral argument — United States v. Chadrick Perry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2024

Well that deals, that deals with the treatment as I read it and some of the cases I guess have said that the time period under that act would include the transportation period. … This is not a situation where a person fires a gun in the air and inadvertently the bullet hits someone.

Oral argument — Estate of Allan George v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2023

She had heard those comments from her husband. Yes, she had relayed those to Officer Ryan. … And we don't have respondeats, period. Correct. But we have a failure to train and supervise. And this court, in a pretty recent case, Valdez.