Documents

Oral argument — Fran Watkins v. Riverside Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2019

There were no other acts of misconduct either, which renders her situation distinct from Ms. Watkins. Ms. … One of the cases that they cited, where it was one, the court used the word benign comment.

Oral argument — Cook v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2010

Well, that's what I was trying to get at, is to have you take me through the acts, the acts of the breach. … And during that time period, the reason why plaintiffs couldn't...

Oral argument — United States v. Pirouz Sedaghaty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2012

The preliminary comment would be to note my objection to the court's scheduling of an ex parte argument with the government. … And the reason I want to refer to the sentencing is that on the tax loss issue, we believe this Court will be writing on a clean slate.

Oral argument — In Re: Deepwater Horizon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

Hungar's distinction between the pre- and post-judgment period, that doesn't hold up because there was still active appeals on the merits during this period. … We are now in the period where there is complete finality.

Oral argument — Jiajing (Beijing) Tourism Co. Ltd. v. AeroBalloon USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024

AeroBalloon, and his Principal, Douglas Haase, in Zhajing, Beijing, Tourism, by which the impellents were supposed to design, construct, get certified by the Chinese government, and deliver these massive hot air … I agree that the standard in 93A is different than under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. But do you agree all it takes is one transaction?

Oral argument — United States v. Tu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

The issue here is the defendant's state of mind, whether they acted willfully, whether they acted in or they lacked good faith for the wire fraud accounts with an intent to deceive. … Tucker throughout the entire course of the conspiracy, but we weren't allowed to present a lot of that evidence because we were cabined into the period during which the model was conceived.

Oral argument — Schneider v. The City of Springfield, IL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2010

They land by air. So they would land by air, and then he would move to his home, which is located adjacent to the lake, and park the vehicle there. … You realize we have to find this ordinance a wholly arbitrary act. Correct. And I think it does satisfy as wholly arbitrary. I don't know the distinction between arbitrary and wholly arbitrary.

Oral argument — Confederated Tribes v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2009

Congress was entitled to assume that it meant that period and no more. … The Fair Labor Standards Act, the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, both of those acts say, no, we're not going to do Rule 23 class actions in the usual way.

Oral argument — Matthew Perkins v. International Paper Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

It's really up in the air, and it's very confused. … Did the employer sit there and do nothing, or did the employer act when it learned about it?

Oral argument — James v. Wards Cove Packing Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2006

period to the winter of 2002 and 2003, which you understand the ship was not in navigation but was in a form of dry dock. … James did, but his duties were general maintenance, cleaning, and repair of the dredge.

Oral argument — Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

I mean, this is a provision, of course, of the Federal Aviation Administration Act. And whatever rule we adopt is going to apply to air transportation as well. … My comment was too broad. What I would say is some laws will be obvious.

Oral argument — People v. Pledge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2015

And this Court stated that although it did not condone the reference to the comparison to the civil standard, it could not say that the trial court's comments did constitute error in this case. … If you put your hands up in the air and you say this is it, does that define a reasonable doubt?

Oral argument — Environmental Hydrogeological Consultants, Inc. v. North American Risk Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025

They got hog slop going all over the hillside and, you know, the environmental authorities are all over the balances to clean it up. And this guy says, yeah, we'll cover it. … And just by virtue of those second- and third-hand comments, you now have a claim for negligent misrepresentation. Koch rejects that.

Oral argument — Pingleton v. Albers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012

I made a comment to Counsel Hendricks as we were during the break here as we're standing underneath Mr. … The evidence doesn't show an act of conflict over that road from 1876 to 2002.

Oral argument — Briggs,Sr. v. Potter County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

And they both had clean records before they ever ran for sheriff. Thank you. Please support. I'm Joshua Cochran. I'm here on behalf of Roy Hunt. … Drake's comment, it seems to me, is more helpful to you, that he hasn't boasting about not having any grievances since he got rid of Hunt. Right.

Oral argument — Patricia MacIntosh v. Ron Clous

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2022

When you bring out a gun, when you're not at a gun rally, I think there is a very reasonable and logical inference that there is a threat in the air. … But doesn't our case law say that an act taken in retaliation of the exercise of a constitutionally protected right is actionable even in cases where the act when taken for a different reason would have

Oral argument — Federal Insurance Company v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insuran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010

They're corroding because of the salt sea air, and does that mean that because they're corroding slowly that they've failed? No. Those bridges are serviceable. They keep working. … It's possible he was acting in his own personal capacity. The carrier there, under California law, does not owe a duty to defend.

Oral argument — Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Ryan Zinke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

And at what point would interested parties like your client be able to comment on the Endangered Species Act part of it? … It's directly in the response to comments. What did you say? It wasn't very much.

Oral argument — Earley v. Annucci

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2020

So it was all before the district court during this entire period. That's exactly right. So it's not clear what Mr. … It's actually so clean that it's — I hate to use this term because it was kind of fun. And I don't mean because of the ruling, but it was fun because it was so logical.

Oral argument — Ramona Two Shields v. Spencer Wilkinson, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2014

So, not only is there a case, but the advisory comments say it. The U.S. Supreme Court in Temple, in just a four-page opinion, makes it very clear. … There's no voiding of any lease, period. And, in fact, what's happened here is the district court just concluded there was a government interest but didn't look at the spectrum.