Documents

Oral argument — Sunnyside Gold Corporation v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2018

That's a fair comment, Your Honor. In this case, the only scoring has been of observed surface releases. That was the EPA's position. … Ultimately, I'm assuming it's evaluated as clean, but there's a lot of heartache that happens between now and then. You're listed on the NPL.

Oral argument — Volvo Group North America, LLC v. Truck Enterprises, Incorporate

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2018

I think that—I mean, consider that— You think that's a general principle applied in the circumstance of contiguous property and with maybe some comment on what that entails? Is that what that is? … You would be free of that obligation because under this statute, you have a right to a clean right of first refusal. I think that's right.

Oral argument — Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2016

This gives us a very clean way to dispose of their appeal. … Silbert's comments about what the board found with respect to the display element.

Oral argument — Jiajing (Beijing) Tourism Co. Ltd. v. AeroBalloon USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024

AeroBalloon, and his Principal, Douglas Haase, in Zhajing, Beijing, Tourism, by which the impellents were supposed to design, construct, get certified by the Chinese government, and deliver these massive hot air … I agree that the standard in 93A is different than under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. But do you agree all it takes is one transaction?

Oral argument — Glenda Westmoreland v. TWC Administration LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2019

She needed the date in the prior week because she hadn't cleaned out the form, and there were two dates misrepresented. … That's absolutely true, but it was not a dishonest act. It was done for the fact that she wanted the – It's not a dishonest act? No, Your Honor. It was to reflect the date the one-on-one occurred.

Oral argument — Ryll v. Merck

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2004

What they said was one comment by one individual that no one else knew about was not enough. … Rather, the jury is there to determine whether the employer acted reasonably. And how do you act reasonably?

Oral argument — Sant v. Stephens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020

But I don't think even if you could find that was within the three year period, that it would save the First Amendment retaliation claim in this case. … So it's simply a matter of cleaning up municipal records as far as that goes. It's perfectly logical on the record what happens. Okay, anything else?

Oral argument — Tschiggfrie Properties, Ltd. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

Really, they've got a clean, clean record and they're proud of it. They work with the Teamsters, laborers, operators, and the Carpenters Union. … We act like you're supposed to look at five factors. Are you familiar with our case? Yes. Yes. And we act like there's not a per se rule in this circuit. What do you say? Right.

Oral argument — Daniel Medici v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2017

So the total period is how long? … Consistent with the way the military, the navy The air force. Pardon? Consistent with the policies that are in place in the military For the navy, the air force and the marines.

Oral argument — Mejia-Castanon v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2018

So if there are bad acts that take place after the 10-year period and during the time of adjudication in front of the court, this is a discretionary application, and bad acts should always be taken into … That period is that ten-year period with all the parameters put in place with the Immigration Act, the parameters that includes the stop-time rule, that includes the period of time immediately preceding

Oral argument — People v. Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010

Counsel mentioned that Judge Wagner had made some comment, whether it was offhand comment or part of his ruling, that this evidence wouldn't have been admissible anyway, and that was probably pursuant … Now, is it your position that the specific acts that are admitted to in the grand jury testimony, those specific acts would be admissible?

Oral argument — People v. Pledge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2015

And this Court stated that although it did not condone the reference to the comparison to the civil standard, it could not say that the trial court's comments did constitute error in this case. … If you put your hands up in the air and you say this is it, does that define a reasonable doubt?

Oral argument — Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

I mean, this is a provision, of course, of the Federal Aviation Administration Act. And whatever rule we adopt is going to apply to air transportation as well. … My comment was too broad. What I would say is some laws will be obvious.

Oral argument — Darden v. Colbea Enterprises, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

The Wage Act provides for payment of earned wages within a six- to seven-day period. … It does speak to the Wage Act. I want you to think beyond that. How should we interpret wages earned in the Wage Act? If we're just starting from a clean slate.

Oral argument — State of New York v. United St

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

It's not a notice and comment rulemaking, and it is, even if it were a notice and comment rulemaking, they could change. … And I'm not saying that a court always has to act nationwide under Section 705, but it's authority that it has.

Oral argument — Adams and Associates, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

I understand that the time period for getting all this done was a very truncated time period. They had a Federal Government contract and so they had to make a lot of decisions very fast. … Again, this is because we're in that short time period, transition period, that they assisted in that interview, gave the information to Mr.

Oral argument — Anthony Kaminski v. Nancy Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018

May it please the Court, Counsel Linda Janicek for the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. At issue in this case is whether the ALJ reasonably weighed the opinion from Mr. … He didn't clean his home, showed poor memory and math skills, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

Oral argument — Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2024

There was no showing by plaintiff that they had to use GAC to clean it up. … And there was about $3.7 million in evidence shown in terms of estimates for blend and water costs from the date of trial through a certain period.

Oral argument — Duran Pichardov.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2012

Could you comment on Mr. Glenn's point that there had been a final determination so that he could not avail himself of 1447B? The only comment I can make. … However, all that's left is a ministerial act that does not involve the application of discretion.

Oral argument — United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union v. Mine Safety and Health Administration

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2019

In other words, if you can use an analogy to I have my house cleaned, it is thoroughly cleaned, but it is also dusted. It is also mopped. … They are able to avoid recording certain hazards as long as they're corrected within a quick period of time.