Documents

Oral argument — Yubo Miao v. UAL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

Because they, in fact, as alleged in the complaint, someone made a comment to him that there was this disrespectful tone and interaction. … Well, I, I would say that he acted reasonably in, in initially putting it on the seat and waiting until another passenger came.

Oral argument — United States v. Walker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2026

So you want him to clean up his paperwork. It goes more than that, Your Honor. A little bit more. To clean up his paperwork. … And all this works against the backdrop of the Lanham Act, which has dual goals, to protect trademark owners but as part of that to deter similar acts from taking place. All right.

Oral argument — Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Bushnell v. Hulett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2012

But Section 78 has a comment that seems to say everything that I've been trying to say. … I just have a couple of, I guess, cleaning things that are just informational.

Oral argument — Bobek v. ABM Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018

If we would begin with Section 16 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act requires that the process and procedure before the commission shall be simple and summary, as reasonably may be. … And they fail to comment. And then now we find ourselves in this situation. It's on the wall behind me. It says, this is the other side. So, I ask that you do. Thank you.

Oral argument — United States v. Van Williams Jamar Bloom

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2023

But she did say that drug traffickers often do have two cell phones, one clean and one for drug business. … He's got a clean record. Right.

Oral argument — Johnson v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

But more importantly, during that window period, it does not say that inspector can only do it one time or only two times. It says they can go during that nine-month period. … So people were able to effectively clean up their act before they entered into... Before they were inspected. Okay, so here's my question.

Oral argument — Ron Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2009

Well, obviously, Your Honor, he was very good at his job because he received a positive performance evaluation and had a clean record up to this point. So what good is he? … Any act that an employee does that brings discredit upon the department, which obviously drinking in a department vehicle, which is what the other cases they say are different, none of these people, well

Oral argument — Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Leanne Marten

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Disturbance effects would be short-term and insignificant, period. That's the whole discussion. That's true. … This use will be spread over a significant period. It will not be 48 hours back-to-back.

Oral argument — 50341 USA v. Mercado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2004

So with those comments, I would submit. All right. Thank you, Counsel. If you may please the Court, Fred Rowley, Jr. for the United States. … But again, what the special verdict asked the jury to answer was whether the defendants were guilty of racketeering acts. And those racketeering acts themselves were charged offenses.

Oral argument — Panther Brands, LLC v. Indy Racing League, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2015

We have cited cases to the Court which held that there are two relevant time periods for assessing jurisdiction. … A specific provision excluding the Navy, excluding the Air Force, excluding other branches of the service from this space.

Oral argument — United States v. Marcus Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2020

I think his comments at sentencing can be described as inartful. … And that's the government's position here, which is there's no error committed by the district court below, let alone a plane or obvious error under the plane air air standard of review.

Oral argument — United States v. Joe Reyes, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2009

If it's ambiguous, you've got a terrible plain air problem, don't you? Well, nevertheless, if there's air, there's air. … And those are all the comments I have, unless the court has questions of me. Let me ask you to focus, going back to the question of whether the counselor categorical approach applies.

Oral argument — Alma Glisson v. Correctional Medical Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2015

The cleaning of the stoma should have been recorded. If it was that important, it wasn't recorded. As I say, only four times in the first 14 days. … Losing 3 pounds in a short period of time is significant, and they didn't seem to want to address that.

Oral argument — United States v. Geiser

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

I appreciate that your honor but if you the historical record here is that the Displaced Persons Commission and the United States Department of State was attempting to sort out over a period of years between … make sure that everybody is applying this in the same way we want to make sure that someone who applies in Vienna and someone who applies in Salzburg have the same standards we're not working here on a clean

Oral argument — BWP Media USA, Incorporated v. T & S Softwa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

Aereo provided a service whereby it retransmitted over-the-air television signals to users. The system itself was inert. … In fact, the — it did not directly dispute or even comment on Justice Scalia's volitional conduct requirement.

Oral argument — United States v. Jonathan Eymann

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2020

The Air Marine Operations Center. Yes. So Air Marine Operations Center said that the pilot, the plane, and the passenger are non-suspect. … He certainly could comment. He plans the circumstances.

Oral argument — Precise Aerospace Mfg., Inc. v. MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2019

In addition to that comment, there was statements of offensive conduct regarding further harassment and bullying telephone calls to Ms. Abde after the balls on the table comment. … That amendment put forth additional factual allegations, which, assuming the original allegations were not sufficient to support the UNDER Act claim, would support the UNDER Act claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Manning

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2024

The racketeering acts, the specific five racketeering acts, could not be considered to determine whether Mr. Coates acted with an enterprise purpose. … Simmons meant to air it out. He said that that was disrespectful and threatening.

Oral argument — Zhou v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2005

That's not a clean statement. It is. It isn't before you, Your Honor. … Narrowly speaking, the court could deny the petition on sufficiency of the evidence, period.

Oral argument — People v. Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2017

Lewis refers to no expert evidence regarding the incubation period or the transmission. Lewis argues that the incubation period is a non-issue because he claims he never had chlamydia. … So we know that the incubation period and the transmission rate is relevant.