Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.49s
Oral argument — Taggart v. Lorenzen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2019
ticket, a clean bill of health, instead of just, you know, going after the newly released debtor who's getting a fresh start. … We acted reasonably and in good faith.
54 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Silvestre Avila Herrera
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010
Is your client going to be better served by going back with a clean sheet of paper and letting a different judge make a brand new calculation? … We're going to act like it makes a difference. Well, can I respond to that? A couple of points.
20 min of audioOral argument — Precise Aerospace Mfg., Inc. v. MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2019
In addition to that comment, there was statements of offensive conduct regarding further harassment and bullying telephone calls to Ms. Abde after the balls on the table comment. … That amendment put forth additional factual allegations, which, assuming the original allegations were not sufficient to support the UNDER Act claim, would support the UNDER Act claim.
35 min of audioOral argument — USA V Carpenterr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2005
And this happened several times that they were knocking for such a period of time on a motel room door. And to knock for a period of three to five minutes is excessive. … So what you're asking is, is you made the comment that she saw it. In fact, we don't know that she saw it. There's alternative inferences.
22 min of audioOral argument — Appvion, Inc. Retirement Savin v. Douglas Buth
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2023
And you've been cleaning up the Lower Fox River for a long time. Quite some time. … There has to be genuine acts of concealment.
72 min of audioOral argument — Delil v. Point Reyes Seashore Lodge
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007
Even the comments to Rule 54c of the local rules provides that the parties should be aware that the time is short. … There will be a warning to district judges that if they're trying to clean up their calendar, don't do it, because — Right. There is — there is another way.
48 min of audioOral argument — Russell v. United Security Life and Health Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011
I was struck by one comment, that once Buckley knew about the Vioxx history, we had the duty to contact Kenneth Russell. That's exactly what we did. … Obviously the carrier didn't get it, but they took those steps to assure they had an application they could act upon.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Imari Glover
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026
Yes, it is a clear air review. What's the best argument for why that was not enough evidence? … That includes every Hobbs Act robbery. That includes, I use the example of DSW that uses their own credit card.
27 min of audioOral argument — Pyramid Lake Paiute v. Board of Directors
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009
The Settlement Act was in 1990. Yes. The complaint was filed. There were apparently settlement discussions or something about the Settlement Act. Right. … There's got to be a logical or some kind of analogous basis to do so. 1961 is as good as any, as opposed to pulling something out of thin air.
44 min of audioOral argument — Eregli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. v. ITC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2026
So a couple of comments. … It was the end of the period of investigation and the Commission did not issue a questionnaire to Habas, so it did not gather data from Habas during the original investigation.
26 min of audioOral argument — Eregli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. v. ITC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2026
So a couple of comments. … So Habas was very briefly noted during the original investigation, but it was the end of the period investigation and the commission did not issue a questionnaire to Habas, so it did not gather data from
29 min of audioOral argument — McDonald v. Sun Oil Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2008
is imposed upon the commencement of that 10-year limitations period. … So under some statutes, it may be the act of omission plus knowledge, plus injury. And other statute of limitations may not require the injury to have occurred.
43 min of audioOral argument — Waste Management of Louisiana v. River Birch, Inco
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018
After that period is over, the mayor's power evaporates. … And, yes, River Birch did financially support them, but the point is that's not a predicate act.
41 min of audioOral argument — Heather Minick v. Metro Gov of Nash and Mailena Mason
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2013
Mason acted with deliberate indifference for the safety of Mr. Minnick, but instead acted reasonably. … In the Durham case, as Your Honor will recall, the nurse had initiated the, I guess, the confrontation or the events that led to the confrontation with the patient by instructing him to clean up after
26 min of audioOral argument — Jane Doe v. Board of Trustees of the Nebraska State Colleges
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2023
It's one incident over a period of some short period of time. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. So that's the first thing I would say. … I wanted to comment for a minute on Shake Shaft. I mean, this is a real problem.
33 min of audioOral argument — Jorge Rojas v. FAA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018
It's not like a Federal Tort Claims Act case. … That's my first comment. I guess it's not a question, but it's really concerning to me. I understand.
35 min of audioOral argument — Carnegie Institution of Washington v. Fenix Diamonds LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026
They alerted, still during the fact discovery period, they alerted the defendants that they were having trouble getting fact discovery, they were considering withdrawing it, and then a few weeks later, … When we talk about the acting... That's generally the case if the basis of the exceptional case determination is extreme meritlessness at some point.
33 min of audioOral argument — Briseno-Flores v. Atty Gen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
So he started from a clean slate, essentially. That's not the case here. … It says physically present for the continuous period.
34 min of audioOral argument — MK International v. Crown Products & Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2019
Many people have commented and said you must be a really good trial attorney because you understand transactional law. … Brown was not acting as AB rubber when he visited. He acted as crown.
31 min of audioOral argument — Lakewood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. The Department of Public Health
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019
The Department is asking that the Court construe those time periods as directory. … But like many timetables, that is an aspirational time period.
52 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.