Documents

Oral argument — Sing Fuels Pte Ltd. v. M/V LILA SHANGHAI (IMO 9541318)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

They looked at the Jones Act, said that three years was enough. … They've got the time period. They've got the clock running.

Oral argument — Catherine Petzel v. Redflex Traffic Systems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2016

So in Does COFLEX arguably have two contracts during the performance improvement period while she at best has one? … Petzl testifies she never had any gender-related comments of any kind from Rosenberg.

Oral argument — Fernando Lopez v. Sheriff of Cook County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2020

Lopez was in, we would have acted the same. We would have fired a gun in the air to disperse attackers. … Lopez's circumstances, I would have shot a gun in the air, maybe even toward people, because it's consistent with ACT, so that they dispersed and then attempted to get in my car and drive away.

Oral argument — Martinez v. Agway Energy Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2023

That's for the entire period, Your Honor. The entire class period is five or six years or so. So it costs them like $100,000 a year? Yes, Your Honor. … If they're charging a commercially unreasonable margin so high that the other – that the rate no longer – But they're acting in bad faith. Pardon me, Your Honor?

Oral argument — United States v. Perry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2026

Let's start over on a clean slate and reconsider all of our prior precedents. … Here, the wrongfulness of the act is greater because Perry is a repeat offender.

Oral argument — Smith v. DG Louisiana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

Whether he acted reasonable, whether your client acted reasonable, that's really grist for the jury mill. I cannot dispute that. That's a jury determination. And that he did testify. … But what I'm saying is when you have such a unique case here where a fall occurs at the same time as the negligent act and you can't prove the time period because it's happening right then.

Oral argument — Springer v. Trekon Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

And that is sort of a side point is that I think in any contract, the law states parties are presumed to act in good faith. … They pulled out of thin air just to settle it. They've never offered any explanation or rationale for that.

Oral argument — United States v. Minter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2003

There was some argument made that WAC, the Western Air Couriers, owned the asset. … Then he used the girlfriend's money, fraudulently obtained, to purchase, to start up Western Air Couriers and purchase the assets of Pegasus Air, and affected that transaction by which he undertook some

Oral argument — Royster v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2011

And meanwhile, and this sort of dovetails with the conditions claim, there are a lot of other people in this period, this period within the statute of limitations, becoming affected. … It's sort of a side comment, is my understanding. Well, but the side comment's in the record.

Oral argument — CSMN Investments v. Cordillera Metropolitan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2020

I'd like to focus on three topics in my comments this morning. The first is why Norr Pennington should not be applied to anti-discrimination cases. … Are you arguing for a different result or a different rule in a Fair Housing Act case than from a National Labor Relations Act case?

Oral argument — Sadoski v. Mosley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005

But we also have to see that the petitioner herself really doesn't have clean hands in that aspect of things. … We – you know, constructively, we started a period of remedy as in Riverside, and then she was set free. That's the point I'm trying to make. Okay.

Oral argument — Nicholas P. Marrocco v. Funds in the Amount of One Hun

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 31, 2018

The denied spoliation instruction, the trial judge disagreed with Judge Bucklow's prior ruling, and he said, quote, the court writing on a clean slate, however, it would grant claim its motion and bar … Yeah, but see, that amount could have been accumulated over some period of time. That's correct. And only a piece of it is tainted.

Oral argument — Public Utility Dist. No. 1 v. FEMA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2004

That is a completely discretionary act by FEMA and not even reviewable. If FEMA's argument in this case is taken to its extreme, what it means is that that determination could be audited. … But you made a comment about you said these straight-time people were not working on the chargeable work, and earlier you said they were not working on the actual remedying of the disaster situation.

Oral argument — Blunt v. Lower Merion School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2013

They act as individuals. There was no testimony that any of these people did any acts on their own or did any acts as representatives or on behalf of the organization. … So again, there was no factual airing of this. There was one deposition taken on the issue of class certification. But there was no motion, there was no factual airing.

Oral argument — United States v. Marino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

That list of the serial numbers that Dell provided didn't materialize out of thin air. It wasn't constructed after an examination of the defendant's premises. … His probation officer at the time commented that he had failed to adjust, to make a proper adjustment to supervised release at that time.

Oral argument — Charles M. Ivey, III v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016

And Massey defined 1-25 of the Act, which was the transfer definition at that time. … As a matter of fact, Judge Osteen made the comment.

Oral argument — Jane Doe v. Board of Trustees of the Nebraska State Colleges

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2023

It's one incident over a period of some short period of time. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. So that's the first thing I would say. … I wanted to comment for a minute on Shake Shaft. I mean, this is a real problem.

Oral argument — People v. Tapley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2020

Can you tell me the relevance of the statement RL had been online making suicidal comments? What's the relevance of that? … You would not have showed up at her door had not been making suicidal comments.

Oral argument — Brown v. Davenport

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021

If you were writing on a clean slate, how would you coordinate Brecht and ACPA? Would you say that, for example, that one subsumes the other? … Counsel, would you comment or respond to Justice Alito's point as to the stature or status of Brecht as an equitable doctrine in comparison with EDPA, which is statutory?

Oral argument — Breckenridge Pharmaceutical v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2018

And here, right, and so that has been stated that 14 days is not a safe period. That's the definition of a prescription drug. … question about whether or not this statute is going to be upheld or not, we would ask for a stay pending the November 2nd date so that we don't turn this whole big system upside down and then have to clean