Documents

Oral argument — Estate of George Worrell Jr v. Thang Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2026

And that would be at a minimum based on the 76 to 79 period, even if we don't agree with you about things recorded after 79. … Just your comment makes me wonder, who drafted the 76 agreement? I don't know, Your Honor. The record isn't clear on that. Was it your side or was it Worrell who drafted it?

Oral argument — United States v. Alamilla-Marvan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2007

Whether there was an assault, period. What I'm arguing, Your Honor, is that because what I'm arguing is that there was not a clear finding made pursuant to federal rules. … Well, I'm not here to comment on that. Well, I'm here to talk about that. I'd be happy to respond. If you'd been a little more careful, we wouldn't have had all these arguments today.

Oral argument — Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

system with Turkish customs When it exports its finished goods, that is the rebar it receives from the Turkish government a rebate of the duties it paid on the input so in effect the exportation wipes clean … extent practicable and using information reasonably available to it the 14.01% adverse rate that it applied to Habash for failing to disclose a duty drawback program Habash benefited from During the period

Oral argument — United States v. He

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2016

Both my clients and Nunu's came up clean. That's helpful. Helpful to your client. All right. Very helpful. So I've got no problem with that. … The government's representations that these were representative and shown for a very short period of time. Thank you. Mr. Mullen is reserved some time. Thank you.

Oral argument — Martinez v. Agway Energy Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2023

That's for the entire period, Your Honor. The entire class period is five or six years or so. So it costs them like $100,000 a year? Yes, Your Honor. … If they're charging a commercially unreasonable margin so high that the other – that the rate no longer – But they're acting in bad faith. Pardon me, Your Honor?

Oral argument — Royster v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2011

And meanwhile, and this sort of dovetails with the conditions claim, there are a lot of other people in this period, this period within the statute of limitations, becoming affected. … It's sort of a side comment, is my understanding. Well, but the side comment's in the record.

Oral argument — K-TECH v. DIRECTV

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2013

So it says, it says, the over-the-air broadcasters must do that. The over-the-air broadcasters, not Time Warner Cable, must assign major channel numbers and minor channel numbers. … It very clearly spells out what the invention is, that CBS and ABC and the over-the-air broadcasters have to do it because they broadcast over-the-air.

Oral argument — California Communities Against Toxics v. Environmental Protection Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2019

That's not the case here because, as they say in response to our waiver claim, that they say they made comments, they raised these arguments in their comments even before the action was filed. … Or you have to show that the claim was not right within the 90-day period. And this claim was right within the 90-day period.

Oral argument — Springer v. Trekon Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

And that is sort of a side point is that I think in any contract, the law states parties are presumed to act in good faith. … They pulled out of thin air just to settle it. They've never offered any explanation or rationale for that.

Oral argument — United States v. Minter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2003

There was some argument made that WAC, the Western Air Couriers, owned the asset. … Then he used the girlfriend's money, fraudulently obtained, to purchase, to start up Western Air Couriers and purchase the assets of Pegasus Air, and affected that transaction by which he undertook some

Oral argument — CSMN Investments v. Cordillera Metropolitan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2020

I'd like to focus on three topics in my comments this morning. The first is why Norr Pennington should not be applied to anti-discrimination cases. … Are you arguing for a different result or a different rule in a Fair Housing Act case than from a National Labor Relations Act case?

Oral argument — Villarreal v. Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

So our view is that you just have a right to talk about your testimony, period, right? … It's been a very clean rule, unlike the rule that Texas and even the United States advocates.

Oral argument — Sadoski v. Mosley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005

But we also have to see that the petitioner herself really doesn't have clean hands in that aspect of things. … We – you know, constructively, we started a period of remedy as in Riverside, and then she was set free. That's the point I'm trying to make. Okay.

Oral argument — Nicholas P. Marrocco v. Funds in the Amount of One Hun

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 31, 2018

The denied spoliation instruction, the trial judge disagreed with Judge Bucklow's prior ruling, and he said, quote, the court writing on a clean slate, however, it would grant claim its motion and bar … Yeah, but see, that amount could have been accumulated over some period of time. That's correct. And only a piece of it is tainted.

Oral argument — Public Utility Dist. No. 1 v. FEMA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2004

That is a completely discretionary act by FEMA and not even reviewable. If FEMA's argument in this case is taken to its extreme, what it means is that that determination could be audited. … But you made a comment about you said these straight-time people were not working on the chargeable work, and earlier you said they were not working on the actual remedying of the disaster situation.

Oral argument — Sing Fuels Pte Ltd. v. M/V LILA SHANGHAI (IMO 9541318)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

They looked at the Jones Act, said that three years was enough. … They've got the time period. They've got the clock running.

Oral argument — Collazo-Rosado v. University of Puerto Rico

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2014

Students come up during the periods when she's not there. The employer has a legitimate need to see that there's somebody there. … Gomez was just acting like a supervisor, as someone wanted to be able to evaluate the performance of Mrs. Collazo.

Oral argument — City of Chicago v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017

Well, they were entitled, but whether they were an owner for purposes of the Demolition Act is an open question that's at issue in this appeal. … During that period, Fannie Mae did not answer the complaint.

Oral argument — Charles M. Ivey, III v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016

And Massey defined 1-25 of the Act, which was the transfer definition at that time. … As a matter of fact, Judge Osteen made the comment.

Oral argument — Carole Rucker v. Mary Lattimore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2010

comments. … So, trial judge makes those comments and says, okay, well, bring him on to testify if you want, and he naturally gets an attorney and doesn't testify, but why not air this at a hearing?