Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.41s
Oral argument — Nicholas P. Marrocco v. Funds in the Amount of One Hun
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 31, 2018
The denied spoliation instruction, the trial judge disagreed with Judge Bucklow's prior ruling, and he said, quote, the court writing on a clean slate, however, it would grant claim its motion and bar … Yeah, but see, that amount could have been accumulated over some period of time. That's correct. And only a piece of it is tainted.
42 min of audioOral argument — Eckerty v. Eastern Illinois Foodbank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2022
I know that's very clean. … You heard counsel make reference to the fact that the trial court here commented that you never pursued discovery problem, pursuant to Illinois Rule 201k, and that the trial court so commented in rejecting
39 min of audioOral argument — PARK v. ANAHEIM UNION H.S. DISTRICT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2005
The goals and objectives were designed to offer some measure of self-sufficiency in everyday activities like cleaning up, following directions, communicating, interacting with others. … There were two brief periods of time that they found had not met the standard of free appropriate public education.
37 min of audioOral argument — BISHOP v. U.S. BANCORP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2004
The question presented in this appeal is when, quote, liability arises, close quote, under section 1681P of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. … That's enough to clean up someone's credit report. Thank you, counsel. Case just argued will be submitted. Second case for oral argument is Clement v. Turnoon.
18 min of audioOral argument — Conrads v. Valley Imaging Consultants, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2023
Judge has followed their policies and practices, referred only to administrative acts? Well, I think it depends on how you define administrative. … Here we have much more than administrative stuff, meaning, oh, you have to get privileges and you have to make sure that you look clean and presentable.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ramon Hueso
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2011
Now, the Alaska transactions only occurred over a January-February time period in 2008, and Mr. Hueso acted as a seller to TW. … So in one transaction, he was going to have his debt with her wiped clean. So his stake in that transaction was huge. Another factor in Rivera is trust.
19 min of audioOral argument — Sadoski v. Mosley
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005
But we also have to see that the petitioner herself really doesn't have clean hands in that aspect of things. … We – you know, constructively, we started a period of remedy as in Riverside, and then she was set free. That's the point I'm trying to make. Okay.
35 min of audioOral argument — Narviez Alexander v. State of Nevada
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2015
Fourth, none of the tests, neither the oxygen saturation nor the persistent oxygen tests that were provided over a long period of time, evidenced any type of a problem. … During his comments, now keep in mind, he had been at Lovelock for over two months when this conversation transpired.
20 min of audioOral argument — and 16-2649 USA v. Zafar Mehmood
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2018
One of the key issues in our appeal is what we feel is a violation of the Court Interpreters Act, and that's a statutory governed standard. … But the defense covered that time period, the time period that the government did not cover.
48 min of audioOral argument — Owner-Operator Independent Dri v. TRAN
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2016
You do not write upon a clean slate. This agency doesn't like the harassment obligations it has. In a wider one, they fail to pay any attention to it at all. … The rule says, for example, you can't drive more than 11 hours in a particular period.
42 min of audioOral argument — In Re Seagate Technology
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007
period, throughout the course of... or the duration of the reliance. … Now, in our case, we think presents a very clean set of facts for you to decide this.
63 min of audioOral argument — County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020
ever enters into a contract for a limited duration for a small amount, does that entitle federal jurisdiction, even though in the grand scheme of things it's very, very tiny and for a short, limited period … A very brief comment about the scope of review. As Judge Ikuda pointed out, the Yamaha case analyzed a different statute, 1292B, with very different policy concerns.
41 min of audioOral argument — Bankruptcy Estate of Santosha v. City of Milwaukee
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2024
Over that period of time, Mr. Bromerski sexually, not only assaulted, but verbally abused my client over that period of time, succumbing to an incident that occurred on May 25, 2017. … Justice Jackson, you are correct with the city submits that her job description generally allows for and provides that she must clean debris as necessary.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Garcia (Billy)
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2023
Well, a lot of those cases, virtually all, if not all, are talking about cases that use prior acts, prior acts, to prove the longevity. … You know, it's a reasonable period before and after. But you really have to determine whether the defendant has the requisite purpose.
29 min of audioOral argument — Continental Casualty Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2021
So there wasn't this clean distinction between old claims and old losses and new losses. They got all lumped together. … Somme's comment says. The whole relationship is called into jeopardy. And that's where do we find his comments? Could you remind me?
39 min of audioOral argument — Incyte Corporation v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2025
I'd like to address a comment made by counsel just now, that there was no separate finding of irreparable harm due to effect on investment value. … I was somebody who had air loss, and I start using a product, and the label says, if you stop using this product, all your hair's going to fall out. I would not stop using that product ever.
22 min of audioOral argument — Nidal Nasrallah v. U.S. Attorney General
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018
I think you have to take her comments in context, Your Honor. This was the very first time... … Well, I think the standard of review for a particularly serious crime is one that is somewhat up in the air in the circuits at the moment. If I may address that.
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. He
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2016
Both my clients and Nunu's came up clean. That's helpful. Helpful to your client. All right. Very helpful. So I've got no problem with that. … The government's representations that these were representative and shown for a very short period of time. Thank you. Mr. Mullen is reserved some time. Thank you.
26 min of audioOral argument — Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020
system with Turkish customs When it exports its finished goods, that is the rebar it receives from the Turkish government a rebate of the duties it paid on the input so in effect the exportation wipes clean … extent practicable and using information reasonably available to it the 14.01% adverse rate that it applied to Habash for failing to disclose a duty drawback program Habash benefited from During the period
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Alamilla-Marvan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2007
Whether there was an assault, period. What I'm arguing, Your Honor, is that because what I'm arguing is that there was not a clear finding made pursuant to federal rules. … Well, I'm not here to comment on that. Well, I'm here to talk about that. I'd be happy to respond. If you'd been a little more careful, we wouldn't have had all these arguments today.
26 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.