Documents

Oral argument — Albert Sarkiss v. Carolyn Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2015

And so in the Bruton case, for instance, there's a finding of change of age category, change of evidence, change in time period. … Elizabeth Fehr for the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn Colvin.

Oral argument — Hans Schink v. Commissioner of Social Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2019

But again, there has to be evidence presented that substantiates a 12-month period. But can you pick and choose which pieces you want to rely on? … Well, you know, you make the comment about the sporadic nature of the treatment as a reason why not to attach weight to it.

Oral argument — Lawson v. FMR LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2013

It came, the word contractor came from the Air 21 Act, but of course the Air 21 Act doesn't have officers, employees or agents. That is language from Title VII. … It comes from Air 21.

Oral argument — McGunigle v. City of Quincy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

He gets a clean bill of health from him. In 2012, all of a sudden, Keenan doesn't need a medical professional. He can just, and he does, just terminate his handgun license. … The allegation is that even though it's five years, they were chipping away at him for over the five-year period of time. And this was finally the coup de grace.

Oral argument — Firefighters' Retmnt Sys v. Citco Grp Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2021

And I would just make one other factual point to clean up something that Mr. … Because of the order in which she issued these summary judgment opinions, she did not address the applicability of the prescriptive period with regard to the Louisiana Securities Act claim.

Oral argument — Ranchers Cattlemen v. USDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2022

In other words, you can have people on the outside saying, I don't want to do this ID thing, period. … And the APA requires an agency before it passes a legislative rule generally to open that up for public comment.

Oral argument — Zapata-Chacon v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2022

So he has at least four separate instances during that period of time where he acted diligently. … The entire time period sought to be tolled, and he wasn't diligent throughout that entire time period. There are gaps in the evidence.

Oral argument — White Oak Realty, L.L.C. v. U.S. Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

Simultaneously with the end of that period in 2008, the Corps of Engineers had been tasked with rebuilding the levees that had suffered damage during Katrina. It was an enormous project. … It was partially open fields, about 40 acres, partially wetlands, about 100 acres, and partially habitat type called bottomland hardwood dry, i.e. that these are uplands not within its Clean Water Act

Oral argument — Specialized Bicycle Components v. K.G. Motors, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2016

They had 43% compound growth over the period that we're looking at. … And we have the fact that NoTubes had 37, sometimes as much as 45 times greater sales in the same period.

Oral argument — Transwestern Pipeline Company v. 46.78 acres of permanent easem

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2012

Now, maybe you can respond, but he was there as a young man and only for a brief period and so on. … He didn't just pull it out of thin air. Our opening brief at page 42 talks about Mr.

Oral argument — IN RE RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022

Based on defendant's class period statements, investors believed that defendants had properly done so during the class period. … For that reason, the company, in sum, at least acted recklessly for the entire class period, if not having actual knowledge from June 2020 or September 2020.

Oral argument — United States v. Heon Seok Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2019

Counsel, before I let this go, I just wanted to make a comment about your combined response reply brief. You used almost that entire brief as a reply. … So the restrictions of Section 16.05 of the Recovery Act do not apply to Korean goods. Period. End of analysis. He fully complied with Section 16.05. There was no fraudulent scheme, no crime.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniela Gozes-Wagner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2020

You cannot just isolate comments and that's what the court in Niva held. You can't just isolate one or two comments in Niva. It was a different context because there they are. … Council says plain air review on that. Do you acknowledge that that is plain air? Oh, that was absolutely preserved.

Oral argument — Lamberty v. Connecticut State Police Union

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

And the Civil Rights Attorneys Fees Act of 1976 promotes that. … Public acts are. Ms. Kendall cites COVID as the reason the state legislature in Connecticut hasn't acted.

Oral argument — MacDonald v. Kahikolu, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2006

, Jones Act negligence we call it in the trade. … Counsel for Reno Air Racing v. McCord can come and get set up. All rise. This Court stands to be satisfied. Thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — Unsuck DC Metro v. WMATA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2021

, which involves subjecting those forms to, you know, a form of notice and comment. … What if the question is, on a scale of one to 10, how clean is the Metro? How does that provide any information whatsoever to decision makers?

Oral argument — In re: GREENFIELD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2022

ex-husband and one is my daughter who had a substantial amount of money into my property that they should have been awarded and for the Wormlingers to receive a full amount that they pulled out of the air … Hallin go ahead please thank you may it please the court again to follow up to miss Greenfield's comments to the court it is her burden as the appellant to for the due to the lack of her recent argument

Oral argument — A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2025

Because the way they define deliberate indifference sounds a lot like someone acting in bad faith. Your Honor, can I just add one additional comment on your earlier question and then answer that one? … So if you're going to rule against us, at least wipe the slate clean and say, they want to say you have to follow Title VI because they don't make difference in terms of parties and you have to use intent

Oral argument — United States v. Susan Tomsha-Miguel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

So this Court is looking at it from a plein air perspective. The most likely reason he didn't object in real time is because the comments, when read in context, are completely appropriate and proper. … under a plein air standard.

Oral argument — Nilesh Patel v. James Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2020

This includes claims for confinement in unventilated and inadequately cooled spaces for an extended period of time. Here, Mr. … And I gathered the evidence is the air still wasn't getting back to him.