Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.29s

  • Oral argument — Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2009

    I really have nothing further to add except to make one comment, and I think Justice Thomas was correct. … My last comment would be this. What is the Pension Act really there for? The Pension Act is there to provide to officers a benefit if they are entitled to the benefit.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lopez v. Hoegberg

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 25, 2010

    I asked, was it your understanding from the rules that it required the park to be cleared up and cleaned out? Answer, they expect you to leave it the way you find it, but yes. … Holmberg was really acting in the interest of his employer. We believe that he was acting in the interest of his employer and out of pursuit of his employer's interest.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jorge Gomez-Gomez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2019

    That's a comment. It's a representation. What the judge didn't do is determine what the facts were. … So the issue about San Francisco was fully aired at the hearing. The defense counsel was fully on notice about that.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Toni Works v. Nancy Berryhill

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2017

    Individuals with disabilities are afforded numerous work incentives such as this one under the Social Security Act. … work period.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Onofre Lopez v. City of Cleveland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015

    So this is happening over a fairly prolonged, relatively prolonged period of time. … Others testified we had to shoot because he's raising this machete in the air.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brown v. Davenport

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021

    If you were writing on a clean slate, how would you coordinate Brecht and ACPA? Would you say that, for example, that one subsumes the other? … Counsel, would you comment or respond to Justice Alito's point as to the stature or status of Brecht as an equitable doctrine in comparison with EDPA, which is statutory?

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Benecke

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2015

    testimony was that he had been in rehab three times from the date of the divorce until the date of the final hearing at the date of the final hearing is the rehab that he had taken had taken he's been clean … court and I'll submit if you look that we hearing but we do have a transcript of that motion to reconsider a portion of that hearing and with regard to that I think even just the tenor of the court's comments

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rose Johansen v. American General Life Ins. Co.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

    Do you want to continue with your comments and look that up during? Well, yes. I want to. I really. … And the final comment If you have an answer to Judge Hawkins I do.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — NLRB v. A&C Healthcare Services, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013

    I had no idea whether or not we'd even exist, because that was completely in the air. Counsel Judge Gould, if I could interject a question. Yes. Oh, yes. My voice is probably just up in the air. … With regards to bankruptcies in general, the acts of an employer who succeeds a predecessor in the union in labor context is different, and the successorship in a bankruptcy proceeding is a different definition

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Taker v. Blanche

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

    I take it that the notice and comment period is over with. And when was that over with? I'll defer to the DOJ, but I believe October, there's still no final rule. … I will point out that we did receive thousands of comments during the comment period, which closed in October during a government shutdown.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dane Jensen v. U.S. Bank

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2015

    delinquency period, there cannot be any damages. … Jensen to the bank saying, we're making progress, because they had cleaned up the first two or three months that should not have been reported delinquent.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Morse v. Department of State Police

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2014

    Now, I don't think it's very clean to do it that way. I think it's cleaner to intervene and then file your motion for relief from judgment. … , not a mistake or an unauthorized act by a ministerial officer.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Michael Kaiser v. Cascade Capital, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2020

    Would you agree with me that the states are all over the place on this issue on whether you can try to collect a time-barred debt under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act? … And whether state a mistake, a state law could form a bona fide air defense.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dedic v. United States Department of Labor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2025

    This is a man that worked for nine and a half years as a tow truck driver while living on the base in Bagram Air Force, the Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan. … There are – there is an unassailable legal maxim that exists under the Longshore Act as extended through the DBA, through the Defense-Based Act, and that is that it is the ALJ that has the discretion to

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gomez v. Feissner

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2011

    So we think that it's pretty clear that Feisner knew that also at the end of that 15-minute period. … Now, you'd have to find that they were acting under color of law, state law, not only as federal officers.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Parker v. Donovan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2010

    That it goes beyond just the jury or the fact finder calling into question the credibility based upon a prior act as opposed to talking about a characterization of someone in the present. … And I think that he's in a very good position to make a determination as to whether or not comments are inflammatory, or whether or not they rise to the level of plain air.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Amanda Riggio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2017

    Three, the merchant failed to carry uniformed cleaning of a safety procedure and so on and so on. The merchant either created or had actual or constructive notice. This is very important. … Would you comment on what the record shows in that regard? Right. What Mr. Chester said is that during that time, when there were roof leaks, they had a system in place to deal with the roof leaks.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — etal USA v. Dukaetalpart1

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2011

    In plain air review on a variance, you have to show... Is it a variance? It's not, Your Honor. Why isn't it a variance? … A very different plain error standard applies to prosecutorial comments, and there's good reason for that.

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stolte v. Mission Care Services, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010

    I can't give you the exact time frame, but I know it was an extended period of time. I believe it was about seven minutes from when the wife told him that he needed the oxygen. … Stolte indicated that he wanted to sit up, that that generally means that he's not getting enough air. She did not say that he was not getting any air. She says he's not getting enough.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — POWER INTEGRATIONS v. FAIRCHILD SEMI

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

    I'm going to eliminate the calculation because you can't recover for foreign acts of infringement. … Well, you did it after discovery, number one, and number two, you did it after the infringement period, right? Not after the infringement period. The infringement period continued.

    39 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.