Documents

Oral argument — Nan Myint v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

The judge did not comment on that. Instead, she focused on the fake passport. Ms. … She was basically cleaning toilets and making beds. And there's nothing but pure speculation on the part of the judge that she would have to go through any type of check.

Oral argument — Ponkey v. LLR, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2025

That means that when there's a conspiracy, it's the last over act and furtherance of that conspiracy. What about the securities and SAMP Act claims? Yeah, so that's the SAMP Act. … There were air ducts in the cross space that were lined with asbestos, an unsealed air return, the property was built on expansive soil, and more.

Oral argument — STERN v. SEQUAL TECH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

What we are pointing out is that making and selling an invention or a product is an act of infringement. You don't have to actually use it. … The counterclaim deals with just a discrete period of time. It does, and we disagreed with whether the patent had been properly reinstated.

Oral argument — Air-Con, Inc. v. Daikin Applied Latin Am., LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021

I have basically three comments to make today about the opinion on order supporting the district court's judgment, your honors. … No, under Act 75, Your Honor, we don't have to have a written contract under Act 75. I'm not talking about written contract.

Oral argument — United States v. Carl Fowler Michael Thoran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2016

That patient may have only received prescriptions for one month out of the two-year period. … He argued for the guideline calculation and, again, made it a point to slide in a comment about the guidelines three other times after that point. Your Honors, again, there was no waiver.

Oral argument — MUSTANG v. CHEVRON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2005

Hutchins in the Eleventh Circuit has commented on it. Baraka out of the First Circuit has commented on it. Baraka out of the Seventh Circuit has alluded to it indirectly. … The legislative history of the cases all talk about that being the most egregious violation of the Act.

Oral argument — Aero Turbine, Inc. v. Aeroturbine, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2003

The fact that we had air in there, just to signify it was aircraft-related. It's true that Mr. … There certainly might be statute of limitations issues with respect to trying to recover under the Lanham Act past a certain period of time.

Oral argument — Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2009

I really have nothing further to add except to make one comment, and I think Justice Thomas was correct. … My last comment would be this. What is the Pension Act really there for? The Pension Act is there to provide to officers a benefit if they are entitled to the benefit.

Oral argument — Margarita Serna v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014

When you have an issue, they look at the date you filed the Freedom of Information Act request when the employee brings an action more than 90 days after the period when they're supposed to initiate an … Do you have some further comments? Yes. With your permission, I'd like to briefly – I told you you didn't need to worry about your time, so go ahead and make the comments. Okay.

Oral argument — Jeffrey Green v. City of Phoenix

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2020

The time period in which to file for, uh, judgment is a matter of law, a motion for a new trial. … There's a strong inference, but I don't know that it's absolutely outside if it's a long period. But here, what I'm talking about is a very short period. It's a month.

Oral argument — Liqwd, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2021

But here, the transfer did not occur before the injunction, but the relevant time period is transfer before final judgment. … You have to prove each infringing act that you claim resulted in a lost sale.

Oral argument — United States v. Muller Vedrine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

These are – we're talking about weeks in between these time periods. How – what is a reasonable time period? … And so in cases where the government perhaps acts unreasonably, of course, this court might find that there's a constitutional violation.

Oral argument — Sipe v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

During the time period when this was going on, U.S. Ambassador Baker flew through. His helicopter was fueled using this refueler, and the fuel bladder burst. That's in the record. … Every problem started after the July air conditioner incident. The July air conditioner is the crux where things started going forward. The air conditioner was erroneously put in. Mr.

Oral argument — Immersion Corporation v. HTC Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2016

And what HTC is suggesting is that the Congress in Section 120, sub salientio, overturned a century of settled Patent Act practice without any comment or without anyone noticing. … the 52 Act and after the 52 Act, sprang from the Supreme Court's decision in Godfrey v.

Oral argument — Alonzo v. Cajun Operating

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2023

But she did testify about the church's general cleaning and inspection protocols, right? … This is an act by churches that creates the dangerous condition. It is churches' agrees to and from. It is the mopping and not putting a sign up.

Oral argument — Leon Belaustegui v. ILWU

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2024

The way that he acted in response to what he understood is likely an exception to hearsay and in itself would likely be admissible. … The first time it was acted upon was in 2016, and then in 2018 again he sought to apply for them.

Oral argument — Cosmo Colaruotolo v. SSA Containers, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

Colaruotolo has established that he suffered injuries to his lumbar spine and cervical spine under the Longshore Act and is entitled to benefits. … Stauber's comments were that it was speculative as it relates to the number of days he could get that work, thus it was random.

Oral argument — Jamie Nevills v. Mart Independent School Di

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

So the comment about looking retarded had solely to do with the clothing that the students were wearing had nothing to do with any alleged disability. … As a matter of fact, when he was asked how he got the spray in his eyes while the students were cleaning their desks, A.N. told Mr.

Oral argument — Planned Parenthood Great North v. Commissioner of the Indiana St

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025

Well, if a person who receives that information acts on it, correct? That's what you want to punish. … A bit ago, you were about ready to make a comment on that. At the very beginning, if I recall correctly.

Oral argument — People v. Alexander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

Yes, the defense that no act of sexual penetration occurred. … The state and the court both read his comments that way. The defense didn't clarify it.