Documents

Oral argument — People v. Underwood

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2026

The State commented on his silence. Although brief, the comment occurred immediately before deliberations in his rebuttal argument. No period of instruction was given. … We take the analysis under Strickland and Plain Air. Was there prejudice? Well, there would not be prejudice. It was not a closely balanced case. There was adequate circumstantial evidence.

Oral argument — Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2014

So they want to just clean it up, get this valuable condo and foreclose. … Let me just briefly address some of the comments of my brother.

Oral argument — United States v. Jervis Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2013

Her response about restitution was specifically tied to the court's comment during the sentencing that because there's no identifiable victim, restitution is waived. … Period. Can't all this be avoided by being specific? That would have been very nice had that happened. In fact, there was no agreement for that. There was no agreement.

Oral argument — United States v. Yu Park

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2021

It really is not intended to replace a period of incarceration in the same way that the mandatory state supervision term at Cervantes did. And I mean, I think the courts now... … As Judge Hurdle has noted, this panel is not writing on a clean slate with respect to this issue.

Oral argument — Immersion Corporation v. HTC Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2016

And what HTC is suggesting is that the Congress in Section 120, sub salientio, overturned a century of settled Patent Act practice without any comment or without anyone noticing. … the 52 Act and after the 52 Act, sprang from the Supreme Court's decision in Godfrey v.

Oral argument — AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

It's the activities of our client that will give rise to an inducement claim that they are seeking a declaratory judgment action to clear the air of that uncertainty of the inducement claim. … That's a comment that could apply to the Declaratory Judgment Act as a whole, and the Declaratory Judgment Act does not violate Article III. That's quite true, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Jordan Rogers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

And we know that because the government concedes that the definition of reckless can be found at 2A1.4 comment note 1 as, quote, and this is part of the definition, a situation in which the defendant was … But I think it's a different thing altogether when you have a helicopter that's flying thousands of feet in the air.

Oral argument — Houston Specialty Insurance Co. v. Enoch Vaughn, individually, and as Parent and Natural Guardian of M v. a minor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2018

There's a specific provision that says if you are an officer, and you are a subcontractor, and you're in the construction industry, you're not an employee, period. … The job involved cleaning it off, pressure washing it, and then rolling on with a paint roller a sealer. That was part of what the jury considered.

Oral argument — Jody Carr v. Stelzer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2018

Stelzer first threatened him for contacting the ACLU, and then carried out their threat by acting with warden blades to twice house a next-win inmate who had previously broken his spine in a vicious attack … Again, I know that's disputed in the affidavits, but this needs to be cleaned up here. What it needs to be cleaned up is a jury trial. What did these guys say?

Oral argument — Niki DaSilva v. State of Indiana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2021

Always good to have clean glasses. Thank you, Your Honor. I don't think you'll have any disagreement from the judges of this panel. And they're not clean yet. All right, now Ms. Kauffman-Joseph. … And I'd also point out that the Indiana Tort Claims Act similarly is usually a suit against the state, although the party is named.

Oral argument — Cosmo Colaruotolo v. SSA Containers, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

Colaruotolo has established that he suffered injuries to his lumbar spine and cervical spine under the Longshore Act and is entitled to benefits. … Stauber's comments were that it was speculative as it relates to the number of days he could get that work, thus it was random.

Oral argument — Planned Parenthood Great North v. Commissioner of the Indiana St

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025

Well, if a person who receives that information acts on it, correct? That's what you want to punish. … A bit ago, you were about ready to make a comment on that. At the very beginning, if I recall correctly.

Oral argument — Turtle Island Restoration v. Dept of Commerce

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2005

There's a pre-regulatory process of notice and comment, et cetera, correct? Yes. So backing up from the 30 days, there's always going to be some period. … And if you look at all of those cases with respect to the Federal Aviation Administration, you will see that this court in particular does a lot of air court cases.

Oral argument — People v. Alexander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

Yes, the defense that no act of sexual penetration occurred. … The state and the court both read his comments that way. The defense didn't clarify it.

Oral argument — United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2019

It's not related to this particular decision to hook some homes up to a pipeline to provide clean public water. … So the mine was allowed to continue operating for some period of time after the order was issued, not until it's specifically applied to it is it canceled.

Oral argument — United States v. Lance Stoddard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

He didn't admit that I knew within this period of time that the guns were in there. … There were some matcher striker plates and then went on to say that the hazmat people had to come in to clean the mess up.

Oral argument — In re Wedgewood Properties - Jeff Moyer v. Connie Rogers

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2025

in bad faith but you're all you're not acting in good faith but you're also not acting in good faith if you subjectively have knowledge of facts that would cause a reasonable person to say boy I think … periodic and and the cases seem to say that on the non-periodic garnishment it's all about actual notice basically whereas under the the separate I guess it's statute dealing with periodic notice it says

Oral argument — Hogan v. County of Lewis, New

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2019

Denny heard himself referred to as a fresh air child. They called the police on his sister in the lake because she was … the report was polluting the lake. … were, that that particular act was clearly racial animus?

Oral argument — United States v. Ceja-Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2004

I believe, because there were no objections to it, it has to be a plain air standard. … He committed a substantial step, and that's the Leo Smaldonado decision of this Court, that the act of crossing the borders is a substantial step toward the completion of the offense.

Oral argument — Ninth Inning Inc. v. National Football League, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2026

And so I think he acted well within his discretion in excluding Dr. Rasher, and I'm happy to talk about Dr. … I would say that's an abuse of discretion, and I would say he acted well within the abuse of discretion.