Documents

Oral argument — Hispanic Housing v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2013

Wasn't there like a 12-month probationary period? There was a 12-month probationary period written in on the form contract. So the form contract, number one, was there initially. … The 1.1 probationary period was written in on the top, but that 12-month probationary period is not defined. It doesn't say that it has any particular relevance to the enforceability of the contract.

Oral argument — People v. Lloyd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2012

And finally, in his brief, as he cites the legislative history, this was a clean-up amendment. The legislature revamped the sexual assault statutes back in 1983, and this was a clean-up amendment. … And it was within a short period of time of having revamped the statutes, they did this to clean it up. And it may have been because they included a section about...

Oral argument — Edward M. Seamans v. Temple University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2013

Act, or the FCRA. … Furthermore, there are industry standards that corroborate that furniture may be fully aware of the importance of a clean date of first delinquency.

Oral argument — United States v. Grullon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2021

Either way, it's irrelevant because under Prang, the only thing that the government needs to prove to support the enhancement is one act directing one actor at one time. … We might tackle it for plain air. So could you address that? Well, Your Honors, I believe that the disparity in the sentence is relevant to the extent that there are not different facts.

Oral argument — In re: McClenny

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2018

During that entire period of time, he made all the payments. So under California dissolution law, there's going to be offsetting things. … And having liquidated assets sufficient to resolve the bankruptcy issues, is she obligated to or even have jurisdiction to take other acts?

Oral argument — People v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2023

So the court should reject the state's expansive view here and find that the exchange here, which was no objection, did not amount to waiver such that clean error should be available. … case, if you treat these two situations the same, then there's a real possibility that, that the doctrine of affirmative acquiescence applied when counsel says no objection, that could swallow the plain air

Oral argument — Durell Sims v. Secretary, Florida Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021

If you look at the rule that the prison had in place, it said prisoners can either be clean-shaven or wear a half-inch beard, and the rule permitted no exceptions. And so I think what Mr. … I'd like to start on preservation and our friends argue that there were attendant factual disputes that could have been aired at trial. But that's just not true under this court's be rich.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Juarez-Santamaria

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2013

you sell these drugs and the defendant says no I didn't and then later the defendant asked for a new plea hearing and in his letter to the court he explained I didn't sell the drugs myself but I did acts … and followed along because counsel indicates that he had a seventh grade education but what he told the court was that he had an education equal to ten years in the United States and that he also did air

Oral argument — Svindland v. Nemours Foundation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

McClellan can find it during the recess period, during the rebuttal period. Yes, Your Honor. There's a letter that we submitted, a second letter from Ms. … It was an attempt to use prior bad acts. Did he say keep it out as to negligence, or did he say keep it out as to causation, or did he say both? He said keep it out. The order is silent about that.

Oral argument — People v. Alexander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

Yes, the defense that no act of sexual penetration occurred. … The state and the court both read his comments that way. The defense didn't clarify it.

Oral argument — Alonzo v. Cajun Operating

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2023

But she did testify about the church's general cleaning and inspection protocols, right? … This is an act by churches that creates the dangerous condition. It is churches' agrees to and from. It is the mopping and not putting a sign up.

Oral argument — United States v. Ceja-Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2004

I believe, because there were no objections to it, it has to be a plain air standard. … He committed a substantial step, and that's the Leo Smaldonado decision of this Court, that the act of crossing the borders is a substantial step toward the completion of the offense.

Oral argument — Ball Aerosol v. Limited Brands

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2008

And if you look at Wright, you see a dome bottom that has a void and that traps air there and acts to insulate the air and trap heat. Right, but there's plenty of prior art dealing with scorching. … And you have both trapped air in the little gap underneath it and then you've got air blowing underneath your air conditioning system.

Oral argument — Hani Nuure v. Robert Wilkinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021

If the act doesn't have a tendency to promote, sustain, and maintain the organization, then it doesn't fall under material support. … But the standard, we believe, is set out in ACM, which we believe is entitled to deference under Chevron Step 2, which is actually whether the act, if the act has a logical and reasonably foreseeable tendency

Oral argument — Prov Govt Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2009

First of all, because, as I say, the case is not about the government's acts. It's about the acts of the mining company. Secondly, these are the acts of President Marcos. … Do you wish to comment on that? Well, in Patterson, among other things, you did have state law claims alleged under Hawaii law. It's actually the same. I understand that.

Oral argument — Nan Myint v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

The judge did not comment on that. Instead, she focused on the fake passport. Ms. … She was basically cleaning toilets and making beds. And there's nothing but pure speculation on the part of the judge that she would have to go through any type of check.

Oral argument — Buford v. Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

I think fundamentally, though, I don't think the admissions that you think you got are quite as clean as you're describing them. I feel like Chief Judge Gore explained one medium. … Because they didn't just propose, order him to take a direct examination based on that one comment.

Oral argument — Omnipoint Communications Inc. v. City of Huntington Beach

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

So you're acting as a sub-customer. You know, owning property for a 20-year period or a 15-year period or even a one-year period, it's still one element of ownership as part of the bundle of sticks. … And they've adopted some standards that would that if we don't act, I believe, in about a six-month period, then they may have the right to go through.

Oral argument — Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2015

But aren't they also thinking about state tort law and or Federal Tort Claims Act or Clean Water Act, petroleum recovery, or, you know, other – I mean, there are other possible sources of recovery, no? … It could be the Clean Water Act. We cite a provision in our brief. I mean, that's the main one. Well, isn't principally the Clean Water Act supposed to be either, I mean, if it's petroleum.

Oral argument — Harry Barko v. Halliburton Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020

The dissent cleans it up a little bit. And then the other circuits are consistent with that. It's a pretty straightforward view in all the circuits. … This court presumes that Congress acts with knowledge of the legal landscape in which it's legislating.