Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.51s

  • Oral argument — Ragin v. Riverbay Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2021

    And then he had the other two gentlemen be acting general managers. … Ellison expressed hostility toward the disability in the period he was general manager.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hispanic Housing v. Jones

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2013

    Wasn't there like a 12-month probationary period? There was a 12-month probationary period written in on the form contract. So the form contract, number one, was there initially. … The 1.1 probationary period was written in on the top, but that 12-month probationary period is not defined. It doesn't say that it has any particular relevance to the enforceability of the contract.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Harold Dorman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2017

    He cleaned it. He and his girlfriend were the ones that cleaned it when it was cleaned. There's no testimony that others were in and out of there. … You're acting like he was there guarding it all by the thing, and there isn't evidence that he was in that room day and night listening for anybody to come near his PCP.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ball Aerosol v. Limited Brands

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2008

    And if you look at Wright, you see a dome bottom that has a void and that traps air there and acts to insulate the air and trap heat. Right, but there's plenty of prior art dealing with scorching. … And you have both trapped air in the little gap underneath it and then you've got air blowing underneath your air conditioning system.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Fernandez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2008

    And, of course, it's in that time period, when they don't do that, that all the interceptions that relate to my client are made. So as to my client, it's an absolutely critical period of time. … And that, Your Honor, is, for all practical purposes, since I'm hitting some up at this point, so much for my brief comment. Counsel, you have about a minute and 40 seconds. Do you want to reserve?

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Verner

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2026

    Under the Speedy Trial Act, the court can grant the state additional time beyond the 120-day speedy trial period to get results from DNA testing, but only if the state shows that it exercised due diligence … His conclusion that he made the statement when also he's saying that they're just there to clean up this fitness issue again, Mr.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2015

    But aren't they also thinking about state tort law and or Federal Tort Claims Act or Clean Water Act, petroleum recovery, or, you know, other – I mean, there are other possible sources of recovery, no? … It could be the Clean Water Act. We cite a provision in our brief. I mean, that's the main one. Well, isn't principally the Clean Water Act supposed to be either, I mean, if it's petroleum.

    61 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Grand Trunk Corporation v. TSA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

    So the comment period will close, but there's no way of knowing when, if at all, the agency will act, right, after the comment period closes? Yeah, that's exactly right. … And they had to act really quickly, within an hour. There was no time for notice and comment, for cost-benefit analysis, or writing kind of a long write-up of the reasons.

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jordan Rogers

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

    And we know that because the government concedes that the definition of reckless can be found at 2A1.4 comment note 1 as, quote, and this is part of the definition, a situation in which the defendant was … But I think it's a different thing altogether when you have a helicopter that's flying thousands of feet in the air.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carter v. Workers' Compensation Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2014

    Mayer points out, can result frequently in an air-trapping process. So it's obstructive in nature as opposed to restrictive. Exactly. … And the issue is the statute of limitations under the Occupational Disease Act. There's a general statute that says it's three years for everybody except for three separate cases.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shoup v. Gore

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2014

    You're telling us that we should not follow that holding, that we need a second act, an affirmative act, by your client under oath in order to have judicial stop or apply. … And so if he doesn't make a clean breast of it and disclose his assets, the creditors are shortchanged and the system doesn't function as it's supposed to.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Maclean, III v. US DOF

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2007

    But one thing, there are some comments in one of those articles where Mr. McClain makes allegations that he was, you know, forced out of the Navy because of his sexual preference. … So it was a period of he received two after three years and the rest after nine to ten years.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — John Carruth v. Robert Bentley

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2019

    But isn't the law clear that even if they acted improperly, that doesn't denude their act as being an act that fell within their discretionary duty? … That comment is no different from a multitude of other comments that any appointing authority, whether it's the governor or the president, is going to make with a person that they're considering appointing

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. James McDonald

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2023

    What time period are we talking here that all of these actions happened? How quickly, Your Honor? Yes. He opens the door at second 19, and then by second 24, he's releasing his gun. … I appreciate the comments here. I've highlighted a portion of the point of appendix. I wasn't going to go into this because of Officer Greyhouse's credibility. He's not credible by the court.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — ACLU of Nevada v. Fremont Street Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2006

    From your comments, it sounds like that's the basis for why we think the appeal lies properly. … Clean it up. Go back on remit. You know, sort this out. We tried to.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mark Mayhew v. Town of Smyrna TN

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

    Well, he had three and a half years of college experience and a long period of time of service in the United States. Close, but no cigar. … So is he acting as an employee when he sends the email to town officials, or is he acting as a private citizen when he sends an email to town officials?

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Michael McReynolds v. Darrell Schmidli

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021

    things that look like wrongful death but there are a lot of takedown cases individuals who are taken down when they are arrested and result in injury and this has been subject of litigation for a long period … still give an officer under the case law the opportunity to use the type of force that was here in other words there's nothing non-compliant to buy on his actions can you rely entirely on the violent act

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stephen Wesbrook v. Karl Ulrich

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2016

    Is the theory that that vote then just wiped the slate clean? Well, he wasn't discharged. He continued to function. You're not really answering my question. It's my position. … And it is very clear that the conditional privilege for providing information, which is what the fifth element in Wisconsin law is about, is lost if the defendant acted from ill will or improper motive

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Blomenkamp v. Blomenkamp

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2018

    Now, my opponents argue that Wells Fargo is subject to a two-year limitation period in bringing its 24201 petition, and that it is required to make a showing of diligence. … She had no reason to believe that this mortgage still existed and acted accordingly at the Greg Blumenthal camp.

    90 min of audio
  • Oral argument — SPRAWLDEF v. FEMA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2018

    comment. … And the Park District adopted this plan way back in 2010 after a multiyear participatory process and environmental review under the California Environmental Equality Act.

    33 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.