Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Oral argument — ProMOS Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2020
One, patentee sets forth a definition or acts as his own lexicographer. Two, that there is a disclaimer. And they've conceded that there is no disclaimer. … He did on recross and redirect, he tried to clean up that testimony. But if you actually look at the entirety of that testimony, it will show that Mr.
44 min of audioOral argument — Care One at Madison Avenue v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2016
And so you do have comments about that seem like motivation-type comments. But isn't the motivation here clear? I don't really understand that argument. … Safe harbor seems dysfunctional, potentially, if we were looking at this on a clean slate, which I know we're not. Right.
64 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Veronica Gonzalez-Carmona
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021
the appointment in this case under the Criminal Justice Act, and you may proceed. Well, thank you very much, and may it please the Court. … She was in Canada for a long period of time. She was in England for a period of time. She had fake documents at the time of this stop. She had a fake passport. She had a fake driver's license.
21 min of audioOral argument — IberiaBank v. Darryl Broussard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018
Broussard had acted without authorization. And lastly, the attorney's fees. … They never talked about the actual facts of this merger, where the IT director from Tesh said again and again, clean up your disk. I've cleaned up my disk.
41 min of audioOral argument — Durell Sims v. Secretary, Florida Department
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021
If you look at the rule that the prison had in place, it said prisoners can either be clean-shaven or wear a half-inch beard, and the rule permitted no exceptions. And so I think what Mr. … I'd like to start on preservation and our friends argue that there were attendant factual disputes that could have been aired at trial. But that's just not true under this court's be rich.
30 min of audioOral argument — People v. Jones
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2023
So the court should reject the state's expansive view here and find that the exchange here, which was no objection, did not amount to waiver such that clean error should be available. … case, if you treat these two situations the same, then there's a real possibility that, that the doctrine of affirmative acquiescence applied when counsel says no objection, that could swallow the plain air
38 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jose Juarez-Santamaria
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2013
you sell these drugs and the defendant says no I didn't and then later the defendant asked for a new plea hearing and in his letter to the court he explained I didn't sell the drugs myself but I did acts … and followed along because counsel indicates that he had a seventh grade education but what he told the court was that he had an education equal to ten years in the United States and that he also did air
31 min of audioOral argument — Christopher Hamilton v. Elite of Los Angeles, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020
Well, Your Honor, I would disagree with your comment as to whether an individual can be liquidated. … It says an act against property of the estate under Subsection A, and then it says any other act under Subsection A. So you're saying this is an act against the property?
30 min of audioOral argument — Nunez v. Dr. Duncan
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2009
But act as if they don't know what's in the BP-8? No. And I don't believe they didn't act that way. They simply wanted to answer his response because Mr. … He was cleaning the lobby area and the visitor's center, which is a prime place, and that's why there's a concern for contraband to be left in that area.
47 min of audioOral argument — Secura Insurance Company v. Deere & Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2024
warranty specifically says, on page 10 of the appendix, the warranty specifically says, to the extent legally required, any implied warranties or conditions shall be limited in duration to the applicable period … California has the Song-Beverly Act, and that covers warranted goods. It's separate from the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and it does provide consumers different remedies.
31 min of audioOral argument — Electric Power Supply v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2023
The notion of harmless air is agreement there's air, but that it's not going to ultimately change anything. … What's our take on harmless air? In other words, let's assume it was air to unilaterally act in this way, that this is closer to confessing air than it is supplemental authority, right?
53 min of audioOral argument — Air Transp. Assn of America v. WA Dept of Labor & Industries
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2020
This court's case in Korean Air, Judge Gould's opinion in Korean Air was about general state unfair competition law. … It didn't provide an alternative means for a carrier to argue that there was a violation of the Airline Deregulation Act or the Companion Act.
42 min of audioOral argument — Bruce Senator v. Steven Sentman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017
I'm sure it was difficult for everyone in the courtroom to listen to some of the comments that Mr. Senator made. … These are judges who have a clean record. You know, we need the prosecutor to insert himself into the equation to make it a vouching situation.
29 min of audioOral argument — Voda v. Cordis Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2008
That's his only comment about Faring, it's engaging with a curve. … In our opening brief at page 36, we describe our clean construction as requiring a second straight portion and not excluding additional curb contact.
31 min of audioOral argument — Kimberly Asper v. Costco Wholesale
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2015
The act, the act does not provide for it, nor did she seek it. … So he's not plucking some public policy from thin air and trying to impose it on the circumstances. He's grounding his public policy discussion in the remedies under the statute.
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hale
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003
He gave a false name of Jude Johnson so that when the police ran him, it came back clean. … I think the officer is acting in good faith at that point based upon representations of what appears to be an honest citizen.
46 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2020
Typically, in a trademark infringement action, brought underneath the Lanham Act, the trademark plaintiff has to prove ownership of the mark. … In the Lanham Act itself, if you had a period of... If it was the sole trademark owner and I had a period of non-use, as long as I had an intent to resume use, then you would maintain rights.
25 min of audioOral argument — Whalen v. Michael Stores Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2017
If it is implied that they would act reasonably, where have you pled anything that says that they did not act reasonably? … She didn't bring the claim in this interim period where there wasn't a canceled card. I'm not asking the question of whether she brought the claim.
36 min of audioOral argument — In re: McClenny
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2018
During that entire period of time, he made all the payments. So under California dissolution law, there's going to be offsetting things. … And having liquidated assets sufficient to resolve the bankruptcy issues, is she obligated to or even have jurisdiction to take other acts?
31 min of audioOral argument — Carter v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2014
Mayer points out, can result frequently in an air-trapping process. So it's obstructive in nature as opposed to restrictive. Exactly. … And the issue is the statute of limitations under the Occupational Disease Act. There's a general statute that says it's three years for everybody except for three separate cases.
28 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.