Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.52s
Oral argument — United States v. Mark Avery
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2025
If the court found that plain air review was the standard, we think it's de novo, however. … The knowledge instruction, essentially, the original instruction was, according to the record, an act is done knowingly if the defendant is aware of the act and does not act or fail to act through ignorance
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Denver Lee
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2020
applied or plain air applied and then they found that they they reserved the question whether that type of air is structural but then they found under prong four that that type of air was not problematic … so uh the officers did activate it um i think they were acting in good faith trying to activate it as quickly as possible but i do want to be clear uh when you do watch the footage you won't see the portions
32 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2017
The arbitrator, I wanted to point out, in his decision, he specifically credits the testimony of the deputy chief who's acting as the acting chief, Huffman, that keeping her on administrative duties would … For that period of time, she was restricted to administrative duties.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Wesley Coonce, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2019
I'm asking you to comment outside of your argument. Right. I haven't studied your brief on this point, but if that's where you stopped, it's poorly argued. … Just a couple of other things I wanted to clean up. Mr. Valente said, well, you can't have both a cognitive disorder from brain damage and intellectual disability. And that's just not true.
56 min of audioOral argument — Joe R. Whatley, Jr. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018
But anyways, the Staggers Act came in after this regulation. And this regulation came in before the Staggers Act. … And under the circumstances, while it is true that the damages were somewhat up in the air, they're certainly not up in the air now.
40 min of audioOral argument — City of Decatur v. Ballinger
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2013
Rosewell that at least for the Revenue Act's indemnity fund for bona fide purchasers in good faith of properties at tax sales, the contract purchaser is considered an owner under that act. … Just a couple of comments I wanted to make. Justice Turner, you had mentioned something about any cases directly on point, and I don't believe there are any directly on point.
38 min of audioOral argument — David Camm v. Stanley Faith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2018
Well, the custody, he was in custody during this period of time, whether it was actually in the local jail, the Department of Corrections, or on home incarceration for a period of time. … , whatever it is, five or six week period in the middle of 2005.
54 min of audioOral argument — Tice v. Dougherty
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2021
Those instances included comments on Facebook, which essentially called the sheriff's office staff fees for stealing campaign signs and comments made during a manhunt. … Although, ironically, nothing was apparently said to plaintiff during the 18 month period.
28 min of audioOral argument — Nunez v. Dr. Duncan
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2009
But act as if they don't know what's in the BP-8? No, and I don't believe they didn't act that way. They simply wanted to answer his response because Mr. … He was cleaning the lobby area and the visitor center, which is a prime place, and that's why there's a concern for contraband to be left in that area.
47 min of audioOral argument — Latrina Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2021
Feldmeier also says that Illinois law on accrual is when there is a single overt act that the claim accrues and the limitations period begins to run on the date the defendant invaded the plaintiff's interest … But once that privacy right is invaded, as Rosenbach says, the privacy right vanishes into thin air.
32 min of audioOral argument — NAAAOM v. Charter Communications, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018
You heard what I commented on before. … Yes, of course, any media company can choose the views that it wants to air, but that's not what this case is about.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mario Giannini
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2024
Your Honor, those comments, these aren't comments just on the evidence itself. … So I think to assert that the handling by Judge Connelly somehow cleaned everything up, I think diminishes the importance of the right to cross-examination.
16 min of audioOral argument — Gvmtof VIv.Lewis
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010
The period of possession? The period of possession. … That period of time makes this different from Gray and Puello case.
27 min of audioOral argument — United States v. David Gibson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2026
Or, and there were some comments, too, before Mr. Gibson decided to enter a guilty plea. … To clean up the record, there is no evidence that Gibson smoked or admitted to smoking methamphetamine the morning of. That is repeated throughout the record of this case.
33 min of audioOral argument — Robbie Ohlendorf v. Local 876 United Food
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2018
I don't believe so, because of the Clayton Act and because of the Norris-LaGuardia Act. … As they say, the union didn't pull this card out of thin air. We looked at the attorney general opinion.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Aaron Green, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 23, 2024
He's acting as his own lawyer, right, at that pretrial conference. I'm just getting the, he's his own lawyer at the pretrial conference. … I mean, we've got sort of a wipe the slate clean, now we're back before the court again to impose sentence on this conviction.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Roberto Rebolledo-Delgadillo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016
Reading this thing, he was an accessory, period. Yes, Your Honor. And he was, and the jury was instructed on that theory of the case, and it was argued to the jury. … And, Your Honor, the government did try to clean that up through that course of questioning.
26 min of audioOral argument — Bark v. Lisa Northrop
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2015
But in their comments, they just listed everything that they'd like and say and or, and or, and or. … And I just cannot believe if this is BART's argument, and I'm not sure that it is, that absolutely nothing can be done that even for the shortest period of time causes some decline.
43 min of audioOral argument — Darren Kossen v. Asian Pacific Airlines
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2023
I want to hear kind of what happened during that period of time. … Well, the substantial evidence standard is brought to be essentially by the Administrative Procedures Act.
36 min of audioOral argument — Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2019
What would preclude you from within that one-year period? Here's what you did. You filed a motion to expedite. It was denied. You then petitioned within the one-year period. … I always wanted the agency to have a way to clean up its act, and that's what we have. But it may be under some circumstances it just isn't available. I don't know.
68 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.