Documents

Oral argument — Shawn Riley v. Jolinda Waterman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2024

Acting on her own, or was she acting in effect as McCardle's agent at that point? … Max or Air Bubble sold shoes.

Oral argument — Richard Stanford v. Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

You have Article 3 standing, if you can show that the plaintiff lost time and income as a result of the fraudulent act. … I won't have that clear, clean, common, class-wide injury that I want.

Oral argument — ILWU v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

I was actually looking to see if there might be an innocent explanation that is that maybe during some period during this five year period that the board didn't have a working majority, didn't have a quorum … This is maintaining chassis, changing tires, replacing belts, welding, cleaning the machinery, et cetera.

Oral argument — In re: Rafael Tirado, Esq.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020

So why don't we begin with your opening statement, and then I'll have some comments after that. Okay. Thank you, Your Honor. … So I'm interested in understanding in this period of time from 2012 until the order to show cause issue.

Oral argument — Huber v. American Accounting Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2014

Our rule draws a very clean line. You have to file a certification, and that answers all of these questions. … It's sort of a grace period. It's a savings clause.

Oral argument — Alberto Mendoza-Ortega v. Matthew Whitaker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2019

My name is Jonathan Robbins, and I'm here on behalf of the Acting Attorney General. Good morning to everyone. … A few things to clean up. One, on Bartolome, it is 904 F3rd at 813. It says 10% in the, in the terror context.

Oral argument — Sharif Mobley v. CIA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2015

However, the only comments that I can make on that are really basic. … time period was not set forth in days.

Oral argument — People v. Popoca-Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

So, would you comment on how when there is forfeiture, based upon the failure to object to preserve the air to allow what you claim to be inadmissible evidence that is prejudicial. … I cited about five or six cases where the court reverse based on plain air and outside a few because I haven't my notes.

Oral argument — Brodowy v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2007

Because the GS system was still in effect for all the air traffic controllers. That's how they were paid. … I mean, in other words, if I come in and I say, I am entitled to be paid under the Magistrates' Special Benefits Act, because in a loose sense, I'm a magistrate, even though I'm a court of appeals judge

Oral argument — United States v. Jorge Farias

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2010

legally as a private party would be acting. … This was clearly narrower than the $6.1 billion that Boston Harbor was going to spend to clean up its job over a 10-year period.

Oral argument — Paul Parker v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025

It's under the Whistleblower Protection Act. It's under the Office of Special Counsel. … In this case, under the FRSA, one of the protected activities is refusing to or refusing to not do like a safety act, and here he refused to stop conducting the air brake test.

Oral argument — Melissa Thomas v. Pawn America MN, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2023

Actually, they only had transactions with two of the defendants, but over a long period of time. … Well, first, I don't think the court pulled that test out of thin air. It's a test from Erdman. It's a test from other cases.

Oral argument — People v. Atherton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2010

No, there was no actual specification that it must have occurred during a particular time period. … Again, your question saying does the apple float into the air, does that mean that there's no gravity?

Oral argument — 20-2900_Kars4Kids v. America Can Cars For Kids

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021

But your comments to Judge Fuentes was you want treble. … And the other is on the Lanham Act.

Oral argument — Latrina Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2021

Feldmeier also says that Illinois law on accrual is when there is a single overt act that the claim accrues and the limitations period begins to run on the date the defendant invaded the plaintiff's interest … But once that privacy right is invaded, as Rosenbach says, the privacy right vanishes into thin air.

Oral argument — Shoup v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2016

We all know that once that ice is formed on the ground and it's 33 or 34 degrees out, it doesn't melt for an extended period of time, and plus it gets wet, it gets even more slippery. … When I make that comment, I point out the dubious nature of that testimony to begin with.

Oral argument — People v. Bowman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

You know, one of the things that you've responded to in your reply brief is the plain air issues that the state raised. … That's not a reckless act. That's a knowing act. But they rejected the idea that he was out there to kill her. He wasn't because attempt murder is specific.

Oral argument — United States v. Haggerty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2024

You would agree, believe it or not, that such an authority, and I think it's an authority, is the Motion Picture Association, which had input during the notice and comment period, disagrees with you and … That was their statement during the notice and comment period. If anybody has insight and expertise into this area, it would be the Motion Picture Association of America.

Oral argument — Gvmtof VIv.Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010

The period of possession? The period of possession. … That period of time makes this different from Gray and Puello case.

Oral argument — People v. Delaney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2015

Um, by where you intend to commit an act against Person A. And then in trying to commit the act against Person A, you spontaneously commit the act against Person B. … It requires a lengthy period of deliberation.