Documents

Oral argument — American Marine Corporation v. OWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2010

But maintenance and cure can go for a longer period of time than what the Longshore and Harbor Workers Act would provide. I mean, he'd get more money if he got maintenance and cure, wouldn't he? … These hardhat divers clean the hulls of vessels. They inspect the hulls of vessels. They perform many contracts within the harbor, diving from piers or walking in from shore even.

Oral argument — Forest Conservation Council v. U.S. Forest Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2004

And it was done within a period of time? It was done in the six-month period, yes. Could an EA have been done on the other two segments in that same period of time? Yes, Your Honor, presumably. … And Your Honor commented on the number of acres, but there is no mention of scope in these categorical exclusions.

Oral argument — Phila Marin Trade v. Comm Internal Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

And when you see Agent Dugan's comments, they're equivocal at best. You could draw inferences that indicate he did get it. … Their whole argument is that the only thing that they want to do is to be able to rely on the comments.

Oral argument — Keck v. Keck

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2013

Land Company that I will comment on some of the judge's findings in regards to John Keck. … He transferred it into his corporation, Guaranteed Air Freight. We refer to it as GAF.

Oral argument — Robert Zucker v. City of Farmington Hills

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

He wanted to clean them up, he didn't want to get evicted. … Zucker under this circuit's standard for mental health seizures, but they acted reasonably under the circumstances.

Oral argument — Ashaheed v. Currington

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021

Currington acted out of animus for Mr. Ashaheed's faith. As the facts are alleged, there is no legitimate inference that it was animus based on his religion? No, your honor. … It occurred as part of the whole, it wasn't a separate day later comment. This was part of the entire event. Yes, your honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Alan Godofsky

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

You can be guilty of violating that professional standard, period. … And didn't the Vorey's court say that this is a clear, clean statement of the law and it is correct And that's correct. So here's the distinction here.

Oral argument — Winder v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025

So when he is doing that, he's acting as a representative of his faith. … They were Air Force parents. The child was born with cerebral palsy.

Oral argument — Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. USFWS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2021

And so it looks at things like water quality, air quality, scenic value, reclamation. … Let me deposit two different worlds, both of them very clean, both of them legally clear, clearer than perhaps what we have here.

Oral argument — United States v. Kaleb Basey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2019

But the point is, from Teckle, is that merely commenting on the merits is not the same as a ruling on the merits. … Well, it's a long period. Though I would say that it's only 20... The first one, the length of the delay, that's just up to... in the air. So we're really looking at second consideration, right?

Oral argument — United States v. Nasir

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019

So we have no reason – The comment period is over, right? Well, the commission – I'm not sure. … It may take a long time for the Sentencing Commission to act. There doesn't seem to be any prospect of filling the quorum soon.

Oral argument — San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper v. County of San Luis Obispo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2025

It was also a case involving the federal government and section 7 of the act which allows for consultation. … on this ongoing case and we're not going to comment on these work plans but the thing that's being overlooked is they added however we will comment when you provide your habitat conservation plan the

Oral argument — Michael Muir v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2025

The other thing I would say, this court has held that the 60-day time period is not jurisdictional in the Bonacci case. … But then you would have to go do a whole new case or you have to go try to travel again, try to go by air.

Oral argument — Anne Guthrie v. Coal Bed Services Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2025

Toxie was the acting supervisor that day. He pulls up in a company truck and says, hey, you're going to wash my truck next. … Williams' response to the plaintiffs' complaints of discrimination, when they called their acting supervisor, James Toxey, racist.

Oral argument — OPM v. Moulton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2025

OPM's internal instructions, which OPM chose not to submit into the record, even after being ordered to do so by the acting clerk of the board. You say those are in the record? … We haven't changed our position, so we don't need notice and comment, is basically what you're saying. I mean, I think that's right.

Oral argument — OPM v. Moulton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2025

OPM's internal instructions, which OPM chose not to submit into the record, even after being ordered to do so by the acting clerk of the board. You say those are in the record? Oh, sorry. … We haven't changed our position, so we don't need notice and comment is basically what you're saying. I think that's right.

Oral argument — Gregory Aregood, Jr. v. Givaudan Flavors Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2018

And again, his comments relate to Tastemaker's investigation of respiratory illness in its plant in the 1990s. So perhaps one background fact may help put this in context. … Once you heat them, the diacetyl is released into the air and that is then the question, is that enough to cause disease?

Oral argument — Donald Wortman v. Amy Yang

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2017

And travel agents act exact as agents. … And as a matter of public policy under the Sherman Act, we are only going to allow direct purchasers to sue for damages. The indirects still have a Sherman Act claim for deductible damage.

Oral argument — Richard Stanford v. Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

You have Article 3 standing, if you can show that the plaintiff lost time and income as a result of the fraudulent act. … I won't have that clear, clean, common, class-wide injury that I want.

Oral argument — Huber v. American Accounting Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2014

Our rule draws a very clean line. You have to file a certification, and that answers all of these questions. … It's sort of a grace period. It's a savings clause.