Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.59s
Oral argument — Wright v. Department of Children & Family Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025
I would agree with that, Your Honor And does not the Administrative Procedure Act apply to this case? … It does, Your Honor And so how can the agency adopt rules allowing hearsay when the Administrative Procedure Act says that the rules of evidence will apply?
48 min of audioOral argument — Hansen v. City of New York
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2026
Well, that's something that's interesting, because what the district court was looking at is certain of the specific acts which were directed against Mr. Hansen. … Just a comment, if I may, about what counsel was saying about Defendant Gamble, who was the trial commissioner, I think is the title that he had, who conducted the departmental trial.
27 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2011
No, but let's suppose that this is where we're considering this on a clean slate. Okay, clean slate. … Certainly, unless and until a reference within that one-year period is uncovered. That's correct, Your Honor.
50 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Douglas McClain, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014
And the consensus theory, which is what the jury accepted, was that these contracts were just a facade and part of ñ created this air of legitimacy. … Had the government commented in such a way, that would have been Griffith error in our view and Griffin error in our view.
29 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010
The Juvenile Act, the Only Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, the Adoption Act, and the Probate Act. … But it would strike me as it's possible for a short period. The related child adoption question.
29 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ramirez
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2008
Oh, during that Blakeley period? Yes. I guess I wasn't practicing or a trial judge then, but that's different from this. … That is not a comment on the veracity of the witness.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Charles Walker, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2022
The testimony that he was acting afraid came during the direct of the other employee. … So I understand that at least some of this may be under plein air. I would argue that not all of it should be viewed as plein air. There were, in fact, objections.
38 min of audioOral argument — SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016
In Petrella, the Court reaffirmed the principle that when Congress enacts a limitations period, that courts may not apply the doctrine of laches to shorten the statutory period. … The legislative history of that Act reads like bleak house.
61 min of audioOral argument — Maria Sanchez v. Compania Mexicana De Aviacion
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2009
Quote, the price of the ticket may include taxes and fees, comma, which are imposed on the air transportation by government authorities, period. … And I would like to point out, Your Honor, that there are three cases involving the Airline Deregulation Act.
48 min of audioOral argument — Ashaheed v. Currington
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021
Currington acted out of animus for Mr. Ashaheed's faith. As the facts are alleged, there is no legitimate inference that it was animus based on his religion? No, your honor. … It occurred as part of the whole, it wasn't a separate day later comment. This was part of the entire event. Yes, your honor.
38 min of audioOral argument — Robert Zucker v. City of Farmington Hills
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015
He wanted to clean them up, he didn't want to get evicted. … Zucker under this circuit's standard for mental health seizures, but they acted reasonably under the circumstances.
30 min of audioOral argument — in re: N. American Service Hldgs v. Eric M. Black
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2014
And, in fact, they have claimed that, instead, it arises under the Declaratory Relief Act, not under Bankruptcy Code. … It's just another way to clean up the options if you don't want to look at the Section 544.
31 min of audioOral argument — ASSOC AMERICAN SCHOOL PAPER v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010
Horgan's comments. And a lot of the numbers here, this is a case about numbers, and a lot of the numbers are bracketed. … Any final comment? Final comment just regarding Eurodiff.
33 min of audioOral argument — Town of Hempstead v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026
It is for causation generally, the comments or the evidence. Well, that ... You go back to the fundamental purpose of CERCLA, which was to clean up contaminated property without looking ... … The town focused on what its basic charge, or the water district's basic charge, is to provide clean water for its residents and to make sure its wells are not put down for an extended period of time.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Pedro Alvarado
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015
And so the issue, I think, the further you get away from, and the testimony also from my client and his brother is that they were firing in the air. … I know that, I'm aware my initial comment sounds rather strange, and I'm not saying in certain places, in certain places, you change the definition of self-defense.
35 min of audioOral argument — Darren Kossen v. Asian Pacific Airlines
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2023
I want to hear kind of what happened during that period of time. … Well, the substantial evidence standard is brought to be essentially by the Administrative Procedures Act.
36 min of audioOral argument — Indiana Public Retirement v. Pluralsight
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2022
claims, the Securities Act claims. … So why isn't that a sufficient allegation under the, not the Exchange Act, the Securities Act claims? So to plead a strong inference of cyanter, Your Honor, they must show a strong...
30 min of audioOral argument — Turoff v. Republic Western Ins.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2004
Turok himself had been a resident of the state of Arizona for some period of time. In March of 2001, he took a job in Texas, and at that point in time, maintained an apartment. … As I read the Act when I started my comments on this argument, 29 U.S.C. says an individual may not waive any right or claim under this chapter. That's what it has to deal with.
47 min of audioOral argument — Betty Denson v. Donald Gerteisen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 21, 2023
Such use is marked by various acts of ownership and control, like maintaining a relatively continuous physical presence, performing routine cleaning and maintenance, altering furniture and decor, keeping … So, essentially, it is their home, albeit for a week, and which, again, Georgia law says in many of the cases there's no specific period through which a landlord-tenant relationship has to exist.
34 min of audioOral argument — Wanda Buckner v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2007
So I think that that doesn't really require that much more comment. … But it goes further than the Rules of Decision Act. The Rules of Decision Act puts a period there, and the Price-Anderson goes on to say except where inconsistent with such section.
120 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.