Documents

Oral argument — Bailey v. Del Papa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2007

That is a clean, as I call it, exhausted, federalized claim. In other words, these are claims that Mr. … Lambros has commented on or anything else in this particular matter. Previously, the panel remanded it for consideration in light of Kelly v. Small.

Oral argument — Scherer Design Group,LLC v. Ahead Engineering LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

You acted deadly, but they acted worse than you did. That is a relevant consideration and equity. Judge Schwartz, in her colloquy with Mr. Kissler, did ask about that. … I supposed to clean it, to go in and clean it out and perhaps pass it on to somebody else. Yes. But you use that computer to get into a Facebook account.

Oral argument — NAAAOM v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018

You heard what I commented on before. … Yes, of course, any media company can choose the views that it wants to air, but that's not what this case is about.

Oral argument — United States v. Ruben Pena-Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

The air fresheners. Well, and air fresheners. I'm sorry. The law enforcement stations. Correct. I'm sorry. All the symbols and the— Right. The visible— And this trooper testified without objection. … His order just says, you know, the air fresheners, the rosaries, the St. Jude medal, the law enforcement stickers. He doesn't mention her comments.

Oral argument — Invenergy Nelson LLC v. Rock Falls Township High School District No. 301

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2020

There's no allegation that the district committed any act that Invenergy relied on that caused Invenergy to rely on this resolution. … and application of the statute that you couldn't, if he's already decided how the statute is going to work in his mind, it's not going to be a cleaning issue at that point.

Oral argument — Oberson v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2005

And at 35 miles per hour, 10 miles below the speed limit, the skis go into the air, which our expert said, you don't have any control when your skis are in the air. … Tice is not an acting in concert case. It's a case for- That's right, it's not an acting in concert case, but why doesn't it apply here? Because it was never argued, it was never dealt with.

Oral argument — Arlene Dugmore v. Mary Lattimore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2011

Let's clean up the prose, all right? Yes. But the evidence that he was killed by Mr. Arias, who was a drug dealer, and by the Well, he was killed by Mr. Herzl. He was the co-defendant. … Well, I'll certainly be glad to retract my comments. Thank you, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Cahaba Riverkeeper v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2018

That begins with a determination by EPA whether cause exists to determine that the state is not administering its NPDES program in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and EPA regulations … The Clean Water Act does not constrain EPA's discretion to begin withdrawal proceedings.

Oral argument — Griffith Foods International I v. National Union Fire Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

It says that we reserve the right to argue that these events occurred outside the policy period. … I mean, it just seems to me you've got 35 years of pollutants being emitted into the air and you've got a two-year policy period back from the early 1980s.

Oral argument — Gross v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2015

When the Commission went past the two issues of disablement and nation extent, it was acting without authority. In layman's language, everything else was decided. … Timeliness, the two year period of approving disablement, is Section 1N. It's not in the section on disablement.

Oral argument — Erwin v. Motorola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

Wiracoon testified by affidavit that the documents relevant to these issues, the exposure documents, material safety data sheets, air quality testing, all of those were with the division and with the plants … But the defendant determined at its Schomburg headquarters to use known reproductively dangerous chemicals in its various clean rooms. And this conduct had been going on for decades.

Oral argument — People v. Nolen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

But that's an argument that the trial court aired by moving it to the second stage. And the Supreme Court says that ain't the issue for us. … He was given an opportunity to clean it up, to present it in an equitable fashion, and counsel couldn't do it. And I think that's where we are.

Oral argument — United States v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2025

That's a final judgment as to all issues raised, period, whether the court commented on it or not, isn't it? This court's judgment vacated the formative court. … Section 853C, all right, title, and interest in forfeited property vests in the United States upon the commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture.

Oral argument — Griffith Foods International Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2025

Section 8, which I mentioned a moment ago, says that the purpose of the act is to assure that no air contaminants are discharged into the atmosphere without being given the degree of treatment or control … The act defines air pollution, and this is Section 3.115A, as the presence in the atmosphere of one or more contaminants in sufficient quantities, in sufficient quantities, as to be injurious to health

Oral argument — John Sabo v. Megan Erickson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2022

It didn't include a period of incarceration. I mean, he violated, so then he was put in jail on a whole, but it didn't include a period of incarceration. … And it does not matter that other acts are also proximate causes of the ultimate violation or that some of those acts were taken by an actor who is absolutely immune, such as in this case, the sentencing

Oral argument — Parra v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2017

The arbitrator, I wanted to point out, in his decision, he specifically credits the testimony of the deputy chief who's acting as the acting chief, Huffman, that keeping her on administrative duties would … For that period of time, she was restricted to administrative duties.

Oral argument — American Public Gas Association v. DOE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2023

Neal for the petitioner Air Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute. Mr. Starcher for the respondent. All right, Mr. Day, good morning. Good morning. … would decline an investment with a 900-year payback period.

Oral argument — Casey v. Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2004

The last comment counsel made in response to Judge Wardlaw's comment, I think it shows how he doesn't understand the state of mind exception. You were right on track. … There's comments about negative comments that Mr. Casey made. This is in the newspaper articles, things that he asked for insurance coverage early on.

Oral argument — Hamilton v. Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

So after the 7 years after a conviction of certain felonies, then you're eligible again if you're clean and haven't had any other problems. … There's a period where if somebody's shown that they've gotten their act together, you can use some discretion. They absolutely could have said that. You don't want anybody.

Oral argument — Oregon Restaurant and Lodging v. Thomas Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2015

But it went through notice and comment, correct? It went through notice and comment. So that would have been the time to say, look, the regs say what they say. … They would have taken notice and commented at the Labor Department.