Documents

Oral argument — Mackinac Tribe v. Sally Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2016

mistakes all the time and that it's not a question that these entities were not recognized because they were recognized and all the acknowledgement process does is say look back and say over all this period … were under federal supervision in 1934 they have to meet those 2 standards we believe that they can't but they were prevented from presenting that evidence because of this idea that came out out of thin air

Oral argument — Newcal Industries v. IKON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2007

So what you're saying is at the end of the period, they lie and trick the customer into signing 60-month renewal on his obsolete copier? During the period, any time during the period. … But if BMW will sell the garage near your workplace, air filters and oil filters and all that stuff, and you just choose to go to BMW because basically you've already paid for your air filters and oil

Oral argument — Habdab, LLC v. County of Lake

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2023

You've got the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, the Constitution at play, the impact fee provisions, and the annexation provisions, correct? You do. … Intergovernmental cooperation, as I mentioned, is encouraged by the Constitution and the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act.

Oral argument — People v. Nolen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

But that's an argument that the trial court aired by moving it to the second stage. And the Supreme Court says that ain't the issue for us. … He was given an opportunity to clean it up, to present it in an equitable fashion, and counsel couldn't do it. And I think that's where we are.

Oral argument — Erwin v. Motorola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

Wiracoon testified by affidavit that the documents relevant to these issues, the exposure documents, material safety data sheets, air quality testing, all of those were with the division and with the plants … But the defendant determined at its Schomburg headquarters to use known reproductively dangerous chemicals in its various clean rooms. And this conduct had been going on for decades.

Oral argument — Carney v. Lincolnshire

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2018

He and his crew extinguished fires for periods of time as short as 15 minutes, as long as two and a half hours. … I just have a couple of comments. First of all, Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Nasir_En Banc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2020

Nassir's conviction on plain-air review. Three interrelated concepts compel that conclusion. First, plain-air review requires the defendant to demonstrate the probability of a different result. … Daniels opinion, in which the court was examining the very, very analogous provisions within the Armed Career Criminal Act.

Oral argument — Griffith Foods International I v. National Union Fire Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

It says that we reserve the right to argue that these events occurred outside the policy period. … I mean, it just seems to me you've got 35 years of pollutants being emitted into the air and you've got a two-year policy period back from the early 1980s.

Oral argument — Corning Place Ohio LLC v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2025

it here in this TEFRA, Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act proceeding. … So you're kind of just throwing all these deduction options in the air? We never thought it possible we'd get both at the same time?

Oral argument — US Fidelity and Guar v. Soco West, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2008

But I think the only thing that bears comment there is it isn't clear what the jury's problem was. … Wasn't there some evidence in the record that if there had been a large spill and the people were out there trying to clean it up, that the fumes would kill them?

Oral argument — Matthew Couch v. Verizon Communications Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2023

Mueller is actually making a comment about the social media. He gets the information. Well, he's making comment partly through witnesses and partly through direct direct looking at them himself. … It just comes out of thin air. And I think we're entitled to discovery on that.

Oral argument — Severson v. Ross

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025

Severson act in the way that a grieving and a shocked, um, husband would have, uh, in the aftermath of Mary's death. … And then on cross defense counsel attempted to clean the sequence up. And I think he asked a fair question.

Oral argument — Center for a Sustainable Coast v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2023

So they don't have clean hands here in terms of saying, well, we reasonably relied on the Corps to issue this without any public notice. Mr. … We sued saying that that was a violation of the Seashore Act.

Oral argument — Chislett v. New York City Department of Education

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2025

And these weren't just random off comments. These were significant comments. And when she complained about it to her supervisors, nothing was done. She was told that this is the policy. … And the leaders got up and said, there are people here among us who act like they're for us, but they're not with us.

Oral argument — People v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

Sure, he was asking – So that anyone could walk in during those periods of time, right? Sure. … If the evidence is close on one element, that's when plain air and SEBI kick in. So we agree injuries were serious. We agree some other of these elements were met.

Oral argument — Milwaukee Police Association v. City of Milwaukee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

Because there was a period, first of all, there was a three month delay in the effective date of the new stat, of the new ordinance, and then there was a six month period to come into compliance, which … How many officers are affected by this interim period? Not very many, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Reyes-Romero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020

The record is quite clear that if the district court entered an order saying, indictment dismissed, period, they had no objection to that. … The Judgment Act said as much. Right. I wasn't suggesting that.

Oral argument — L. Anderson v. Michaels Stores Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2015

Rule 23, and under the Rules Enabling Act. So you look at this as essentially a class action rule. … One other circuit commented that CSS abandoned Robin. I'm asking the court. Why?

Oral argument — United States v. Ruben Pena-Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

The air fresheners. Well, and air fresheners. I'm sorry. The law enforcement stations. Correct. I'm sorry. All the symbols and the— Right. The visible— And this trooper testified without objection. … His order just says, you know, the air fresheners, the rosaries, the St. Jude medal, the law enforcement stickers. He doesn't mention her comments.

Oral argument — ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2019

You've got a short period of time, so why don't I... We'll turn to the chapter 90 provision. Yeah, which is the major issue. … So there is a substantial difference between that and the devices which act on light here, is there not?