Documents

Oral argument — McNabb v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2003

Now that I've talked you out of your first answer, let me say or suggest to you that the answer you came up with second, and this is not a personal comment, that's a really stupid answer, stupid in the … Bowen, which I cited in my brief, refers to Social Security rulings being given deference unless they are erroneous or inconsistent with the regulations or the Act.

Oral argument — Brettman v. Cook and Son, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 18, 2020

Vila was traveling in was 29 feet in the air, which is 3.4 feet too high. The one in the adjacent lane to his right was 32 feet in the air, also way too high. … So, I mean, he made several comments to indicate that he did not believe that Dr. Noyes' testimony was admissible because it was not factual.

Oral argument — S. L. v. Upland Unified School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013

Well, you've got to help me out, then, because this is not a clean win-lose kind of a case. So what can you give me? … If the parent acts unreasonably, then you can reduce the fees based on the unreasonable activity. And the parent acted unreasonably.

Oral argument — Yueh-lan Wang v. New Mighty U.S. Trust

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016

I think you have to follow the requirements of the Trust Act. There's the Uniform Trust Act and then there's the Statutory Trust Act. … It's been a very short period of time since AmeriCorps came out, but there are at least two cases from both in Texas.

Oral argument — People v. Ramsey

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

But for a period of time, maybe not the whole three years, but for a significant period of time, he has had a chance—it is a he— has had a chance to observe the defendant in court, see the changes, observe … Stanley testified – Between the air conditioner and the door, and the handle of the door is on the side by the air conditioner, so it opens right to where the tools are, right there. Sure.

Oral argument — United States v. Russell Collins Eddie Wilburn Richard Brosky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

But that's from a larger period than my defendant's involvement in the conspiracy, a much longer period. Limiting through his involvement. Correct. … I only raised that in connection with your comment that you know, those records are not necessary to decide the case.

Oral argument — Hamilton v. Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

So after the 7 years after a conviction of certain felonies, then you're eligible again if you're clean and haven't had any other problems. … There's a period where if somebody's shown that they've gotten their act together, you can use some discretion. They absolutely could have said that. You don't want anybody.

Oral argument — Surjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

Again, we have another tolling period here. He's in custody. … Singh failed to act with due diligence here.

Oral argument — Kenneth Workman v. Randy Blades

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2016

One of the comments also made today, the attorney. I can't think that you're abandoning. … If you look at the guilty plea transcript, counsel says what Kenny's trying to do is save the state a lot of money and basically come clean and fess up for what he's done.

Oral argument — Anita Rushing v. Commissioner Social Security A

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009

period that's relevant in this case. … I would only comment that Dr. Hubbard and Dr. May did not quantify capacities. They just didn't do it. Unless the Court has questions, I'll stop. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Oral argument — Scherer Design Group,LLC v. Ahead Engineering LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

You acted deadly, but they acted worse than you did. That is a relevant consideration and equity. Judge Schwartz, in her colloquy with Mr. Kissler, did ask about that. … I supposed to clean it, to go in and clean it out and perhaps pass it on to somebody else. Yes. But you use that computer to get into a Facebook account.

Oral argument — Anthony Booth v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

And it says, it is well established, and this is on page 579, that minority does not toll the limitations period prescribed in the Federal Toll Claims Act. Right? Right. … So, again, I don't actually have any additional comments. If the Court asks questions, I'm glad to answer. But I truly believe this is an issue of first impression.

Oral argument — Donna Sherwood v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2014

How is spending $159 million in excess of your usual budget over a period of four or six years, how is that routine maintenance? Well, that's a good question. … Minimal, it was notice and comment rulemaking, minimal commentary, and the one comment that they definitely addressed was how to do with uranium mining.

Oral argument — Invenergy Nelson LLC v. Rock Falls Township High School District No. 301

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2020

There's no allegation that the district committed any act that Invenergy relied on that caused Invenergy to rely on this resolution. … and application of the statute that you couldn't, if he's already decided how the statute is going to work in his mind, it's not going to be a cleaning issue at that point.

Oral argument — Seaplane Adventures, LLC v. County of Marin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2023

And I mentioned federal because in the context that Seaplane is regulated under the Federal Aviation Act, parts 135 and 91, which we exhaustively briefed, so I don't intend to belabor that aspect at this … And if you could respond to the cross appeal and make a rebuttal argument on your claim against the county in that time period, it would be useful. Thank you, your honor.

Oral argument — Oberson v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2005

And at 35 miles per hour, 10 miles below the speed limit, the skis go into the air, which our expert said, you don't have any control when your skis are in the air. … Tice is not an acting in concert case. It's a case for- That's right, it's not an acting in concert case, but why doesn't it apply here? Because it was never argued, it was never dealt with.

Oral argument — M-I Drilling Fluids UK Ltd. v. Dynamic Air Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2019

Dynamic Air. Mr. Carlson, whenever you're ready. Good morning. … But let me comment on the- Very briefly, because your time has expired. Yeah, let me comment on the post-filing. Take that in the context of what DAI did when it was sued.

Oral argument — United States v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2025

That's a final judgment as to all issues raised, period, whether the court commented on it or not, isn't it? This court's judgment vacated the formative court. … Section 853C, all right, title, and interest in forfeited property vests in the United States upon the commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture.

Oral argument — Gross v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2015

When the Commission went past the two issues of disablement and nation extent, it was acting without authority. In layman's language, everything else was decided. … Timeliness, the two year period of approving disablement, is Section 1N. It's not in the section on disablement.

Oral argument — United States v. Jesus Aguilar-Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2016

So, realistically, he won't have to be serving the supervised release period because he won't be in the United States, but Your Honor is correct. There would be a supervised release period in place. … of the plain air standard.