Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Oral argument — Babcock Wilcox Company v. Cormetech Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016
It says what happens during those periods. … You know, let's say it's not cleaning out the knocks. And it's supposed to, I mean, the whole time it's not cleaning it out. I mean, once they figure that out, they should bring suit, right?
41 min of audioOral argument — Newcal Industries v. IKON
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2007
So what you're saying is at the end of the period, they lie and trick the customer into signing 60-month renewal on his obsolete copier? During the period, any time during the period. … But if BMW will sell the garage near your workplace, air filters and oil filters and all that stuff, and you just choose to go to BMW because basically you've already paid for your air filters and oil
52 min of audioOral argument — Westmoreland Coal Company v. Herskel Stallard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017
The real dispute is how much he smoked on a daily basis during that 40-year period. … air he can blow out, Dr.
35 min of audioOral argument — Peggy Barnum v. Ohio State University Medical
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015
Well, I'm not making this up out of thin air, Counselor. No, I'm not. That's what the district court found. … First, it was a number of comments over a period of weeks. Is there a procedure to document comments or whatever? No, there is an event reporting system when specific incidents with patients occur.
46 min of audioOral argument — Susan Abeles v. Metropolitan Wash. Airport
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016
But it seems to me, in fairness, the employer doesn't have a completely clean hand in this situation. … Lewin, your introductory comment seems to suggest that this came as a complete surprise to her, and the reason that I'm having difficulty with that is that I am looking at Susan Abeles' 2013 work goals
44 min of audioOral argument — Larry Johnson v. Schulte Hosp. Group, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2023
And she was actually back in her office during some of that time period, right? Yes. So nothing else was happening between the two of them. Right. You know, she left. … This is a period where there's no vaccines. Borders are closing. We're wiping down our groceries with Lysol. Like no one knows what's going on. This hotel went.
32 min of audioOral argument — People v. Nelson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018
Sure, he was asking – So that anyone could walk in during those periods of time, right? Sure. … If the evidence is close on one element, that's when plain air and SEBI kick in. So we agree injuries were serious. We agree some other of these elements were met.
23 min of audioOral argument — Larry Doiron, Incorporated v. Spclt Rntl To
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2017
I think you could make an argument about ship construction contracts, but I think that was the focus of that comment. … That would be a very clean black-letter law, yes. Pardon? That would be a very clean, black-letter, straight-line boundary. I would actually go with that. It would clean up many issues.
63 min of audioOral argument — Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. Lianzhou Technologies Co., Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2026
Here's what's concerning me because I thought we had tried to clean up where this work was going to be done in Echo Factor, and it seems like it's not been cleaned up enough if you're arguing this. … With that context in mind, it's important to see that the pre-complaint inducement period that we're all arguing about here is six months long.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Carlos Benson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018
We would suggest that that analysis has a difference in the photographs, for instance, from the very clinical, clean autopsy photographs of the same wounds compared to the bloody shirt that was underneath … I believe their argument isn't so much that that this court can just ignore an illegal sentence, but in the context of plain air, which I think is where she wants to focus on that the court has the opportunity
34 min of audioOral argument — Hansen v. City of New York
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2026
Well, that's something that's interesting, because what the district court was looking at is certain of the specific acts which were directed against Mr. Hansen. … Just a comment, if I may, about what counsel was saying about Defendant Gamble, who was the trial commissioner, I think is the title that he had, who conducted the departmental trial.
27 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Yu Sung Park
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2012
But for the entire period of time of the conversations between Mr. Tran and the informant, there is reference by Mr. … But the court acted on the presumption that there had been a representation that the witness would be called and sorted it all out and made a ruling on it.
31 min of audioOral argument — Amalgamated Bank v. Maximus, Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019
And I'll make one final comment. There are more internal documents in this case than I have ever seen in any one of these cases. … For those reasons, I, oh, let me make one more comment. And then I see the red light's on and you're being very patient. I'll make one comment and sit down and shut up.
38 min of audioOral argument — Schmit v. Metcalf
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2016
Lombardi, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant to clean out a barn in which the defendant was keeping a llama. … I'd be curious to hear your comments about what Mr. Rayfield was talking about regarding your client's employer's direction that he not ring the doorbell. So I noted that as well.
45 min of audioOral argument — People v. Brown
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013
But even after his testimony, there was quite a period of time between the time he took the gun away from ultimately the victim. Certainly. … It's the defendant's burden to prove a clear and obvious air, and then the two prongs of the plain air rule, the evidence was closely balanced, or the air was so fundamental that the defendant was denied
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Crosby
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024
His collection and devices were seized, and he was other than honorably discharged from the Air Force as a result of his conduct. But Mr. Crosby was undeterred. … Perhaps its comment that treatment works, incarceration does not, could be read to go to that. That's the closest.
30 min of audioOral argument — Jackson v. Galaza
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2003
What's your comment on that? That's correct, Your Honor. … And I don't think it's appropriate to comment on that, and even to comment on the cutoff.
41 min of audioOral argument — Jose Ramirez v. Statewide Harvesting & Hauling, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2021
But what in the Fair Labor Standards Act tells us that matters? Nothing in the FLSA directly, Judge Pryor. That's a big problem. … Yeah, Your Honor, again, it's the comments you make about the sort of the spatial relations between where the camp was and Brennan. Yeah, that's rejected in Reich, right?
23 min of audioOral argument — Manning v. City of Tulsa
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2025
test that he was high on PCP, all the way through her encounter when she first starts giving him commands, 88 seconds of noncompliance, him going back to his car at gunpoint with his hands raised in the air … The window has been cleaned of blood. We don't know, based on the record, when that photo was taken, but the window does appear to have been substantially lowered from its prior position.
32 min of audioOral argument — Sharon Seleine v. Fluor Corporation Long-Term Di
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2010
The court said that after the remand, Lina paid the benefits through the own-occupation period and then into the any-occupation period during its investigation. … And the only person that saw it and commented upon it was Judge King. And he said, it stinks.
28 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.