Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Oral argument — Nibco v. Tyco International
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2006
That's the genius of the 347 Act. What it did is that it transferred precise machining of the valve body components. … When they molded, there was excess rubber, and it had to be cleaned every time they molded a valve seat.
32 min of audioOral argument — Perez v. Southeast SNF
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2021
And that's what the PREP Act does there. … And then you have, and so, so that wipes the slate clean. There are no claims. There are no suits that can be brought. It's jurisdictional also.
29 min of audioOral argument — Hank Bland v. Carolina Lease Management Group, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2024
Sales Act for the four-year limitations governing unfair and deceptive practices and the four-year limitations period in the Debt Collection Act. … And I don't know whether this is strictly a plain-air matter or not. But district courts depend on advocates to make their views known.
43 min of audioOral argument — Wassell v. Peterson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2010
But, in this case, a broad discretion has to be acted upon with some evidence. … It wasn't like it was plucked out of thin air as an attempt to evade anything.
41 min of audioOral argument — Rhonda Button v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2020
Dispatchers are like air traffic controllers. They're responsible for the movement of trains in all these various territories. … She had two disciplinary infractions in the two-year look-back period, 2015-2014, that the committee looked at.
32 min of audioOral argument — Martinez-Garcia v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009
Alito Even if you had a right under the Real ID Act for us to review the NACARA denial, why didn't you file a separate petition after the NACARA relief was denied in August of 2008? … So that's a clean matter before the U.S.C.I.S. That's done and over. So what is there left for us to do?
20 min of audioOral argument — John Doe 1 5 v. Gretchen Whitmer
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023
Supreme Court said so in Hutto, and it cleans it up. It makes it clean. We don't have to worry. A state can challenge. Long history in this country of states doing so. … So the period you're asking for is the statute of limitations period up until the statute was repealed or superseded. That is correct. Is that right? Yes.
45 min of audioOral argument — Carrie Braun v. Ultimate Jetcharters Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2016
I couldn't tell from opposing counsel's comments when he started. At 14 minutes till 9, something to do with an air collision in Akron apparently last November. Well, obviously. … The jury heard both sides over a five-day period, and the jury decided who should be believed and what evidence was important. The jury decided to believe Ms.
27 min of audioOral argument — Shelly Milgram v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2023
I have some comments on it, happy to respond to questions, but Amiki will focus on that. … But she did, in fact, bring affirmative claims against Chase that were resolved based on the limitations period.
60 min of audioOral argument — We CBD, LLC v. Planet Nine Private Air, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2024
And of course, it should not have acted as the fact-finder in this case at the summary judgment stage in the first place. … Well, we consented to the forfeiture for many months and a long period of time until it was rotten. And my client, who doesn't have a ton of money, said, don't do it anymore.
43 min of audioOral argument — Patrick Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2010
He alleges the contract that says if you stay on and work during this period, at the end of that period, if you don't want to work for us any longer, you can leave, irrespective as to whether or not we … And I agree with your comments, Your Honor.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Bacon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2020
federal rule of criminal procedure 41.1 a says that you redact certain information that redact victim child victims names victims of sexual assault we in quit tam actions we file them under seal for a period … understand your point Judge McHugh but there are material differences here that the examples that you cite are federal rules that are uniform that have gone through a committee process of notice and comment
31 min of audioOral argument — Hidden Hills Management, LLC v. Amtax Holdings 114, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021
But when the purpose of the expense is to benefit itself and to enrich itself, then it's acting outside of its fiduciary duties to the partnership. … It's acting outside of the good faith discretion of incurring expenses and is incurring these expenses specifically in order to enrich itself.
52 min of audioOral argument — BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2020
That standard, according to the comment of 2609, is engrafted onto the analysis there because the Indiana comment to 2609 says that basically the analysis for adequate assurance can't conflict with the … So just to clean up the issue of the price increase since it was asked about. It's true. Continental did seek a price increase of two cents a pound that was outside the contract.
40 min of audioOral argument — People v. Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017
So, can the trial court comment on the factors involved in Bruce? … And during that period of time, the pretrial period, that counsel should stay revoked.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gudipati
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2021
And, you know, that's a, I mean, that sliver of it is a legitimate transaction where they are selling the perfume and getting clean pesos. Okay. Then what happens to the clean pesos? … Blake, who was a government informant for a part of the time that they were interacting in this conspiracy and thus could not qualify as a co-conspirator during that period.
59 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lowmaster
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2022
But every but he act. I mean, everybody acted as though they understood. Yeah. I'm just saying, if you if you got this order and you said, well, I'm just going to blow it off. … Just just a couple of points to to chime in on Judge Fisher Fisher's comments and Judge Porter's comments originally.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Andrew Shelton
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2018
The judge looked at the enhancements, rejected, and incidentally, I should point out, the government asserts that there's waiver, asserts that there's plain air. … I mean, then the time is within the countable time period. Can you repeat that?
36 min of audioOral argument — SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2015
Mills, Simple Air's damages expert. In his opinion. Instead, he chose a completely – well, I'll withdraw the completely. … So, unless Your Honors have any questions about the comments that were made on the joint infringement or notification stuff, I think that addresses my rebuttal.
36 min of audioOral argument — Airmotive Engineering Corp. v. FAA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017
So you said just then, as I thought you said, loss of power is not a basis for an Air Directive, period. The FAA, in its own risk assessment policies, does not treat it as a hazardous event. … During the notice and comment period. You say the most critical. Right, the two accident reports. All right. And that's why I asked you, did you seek reconsideration? And you said no. Okay.
34 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.