Documents

Oral argument — Shelly Milgram v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2023

I have some comments on it, happy to respond to questions, but Amiki will focus on that. … But she did, in fact, bring affirmative claims against Chase that were resolved based on the limitations period.

Oral argument — United States v. Alexsi Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2017

Well, but the Mann Act... The Mann Act doesn't have to be involuntary. Mann Act is the involuntary transportation for women across state lines. … It was just sort of a stray comment to respond to defense counsel's argument. Stray comment, defense. That's your stray comment explanation. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — RLI Insurance Company v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2020

We're not writing on a clean slate here. The language that our ally chose to use in its assumed liability exclusion is very different than the language in some of the exclusions. … Here the question is whether there is a claim for a wrongful act.

Oral argument — We CBD, LLC v. Planet Nine Private Air, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2024

And of course, it should not have acted as the fact-finder in this case at the summary judgment stage in the first place. … Well, we consented to the forfeiture for many months and a long period of time until it was rotten. And my client, who doesn't have a ton of money, said, don't do it anymore.

Oral argument — Patrick Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2010

He alleges the contract that says if you stay on and work during this period, at the end of that period, if you don't want to work for us any longer, you can leave, irrespective as to whether or not we … And I agree with your comments, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Intl Engy Ventures Manage v. Untd Engy Grp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2021

pursuant to the procedures of the Federal Arbitration Act. … I mean, I think you do review his finding for clear air, just as if you were in the KBR case where this court judge Haynes found that it was, there was no clear air that the district court found no prejudice

Oral argument — United States v. Bacon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2020

federal rule of criminal procedure 41.1 a says that you redact certain information that redact victim child victims names victims of sexual assault we in quit tam actions we file them under seal for a period … understand your point Judge McHugh but there are material differences here that the examples that you cite are federal rules that are uniform that have gone through a committee process of notice and comment

Oral argument — People v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

So, can the trial court comment on the factors involved in Bruce? … And during that period of time, the pretrial period, that counsel should stay revoked.

Oral argument — United States v. Wicahpe Milk

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2022

Now, we know that 841 is not part of the Major Crimes Act. … And then we also knew some of the comment, all of the comments of work product things that were written next to them were such like drug user, felon, things of that nature.

Oral argument — United States v. Lance Slizewski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2015

So there's a period of five days in which the police officers had the car. … Sexton in two robberies, on a photo still, identified gray Air Jordans.

Oral argument — United States v. Lowmaster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2022

But every but he act. I mean, everybody acted as though they understood. Yeah. I'm just saying, if you if you got this order and you said, well, I'm just going to blow it off. … Just just a couple of points to to chime in on Judge Fisher Fisher's comments and Judge Porter's comments originally.

Oral argument — Kirk Stephens v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2017

Acting Commissioner of Social Security Nancy Berryhill Mr. Rodman Your honors, may it please the court. My name is Jason Rodman. … chronic And these are actually things the ALJ did not consider severe The chronic kidney disease and incontinence of a couple varieties Combining with obesity It inherently would make breaks longer to clean

Oral argument — United States v. Andrew Shelton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2018

The judge looked at the enhancements, rejected, and incidentally, I should point out, the government asserts that there's waiver, asserts that there's plain air. … I mean, then the time is within the countable time period. Can you repeat that?

Oral argument — SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2015

Mills, Simple Air's damages expert. In his opinion. Instead, he chose a completely – well, I'll withdraw the completely. … So, unless Your Honors have any questions about the comments that were made on the joint infringement or notification stuff, I think that addresses my rebuttal.

Oral argument — United States v. Caraballo-Rodrigues Rehearing En Banc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2013

I guess your comment seems to me to go right to the heart of it when you say there's something extra. … Just another piece of evidence in which you could infer they were all acting together. Judge, I don't.

Oral argument — United States v. Anthony Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2014

I think my best argument is that there's no support in the record as to how you pull this number 12 out of the air. Okay. The other factors that we are appealing is the no alcohol factor, condition. … Presumably he's gotten through the period of the need for 12 times a month of testing. I don't know, Your Honor. I don't know what his history has been under supervision.

Oral argument — National Labor Relations Board v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

Good morning, Your Honors, and may it please the Court, this is Matthew Earle for Air National Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 439. I'd like to reserve four minutes for rebuttal, please. … They certainly might have an obligation, which is why the board's Mike O'Connor jurisprudence is you act at your peril during this period.

Oral argument — Raytheon Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2015

The question is whether the agency acted on a rational basis. The only basis they acted on was the GAO decision. … Let me make just one comment about the TRL level. Ms. Madsen comes up to you and quotes the language from the RFP, but completely misrepresents it.

Oral argument — People v. Mejia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 20, 2025

It says was the motion has to be within the two-year period. … So that was going back to address Justice DeArmond's and Justice Steigman's comments earlier. I'll go to, and then I'm trying to think of my next point.

Oral argument — The Department of Corrections v. Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2017

And the warden explained that inmates cleaned the administrative building at Western, where Ms. … And then he went on to interpret it as an irresponsible act by somebody in a supervisory position, which is not precisely what was in the charge.