Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.93s

  • Oral argument — Sierra Club v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2020

    Just as the Clean Water Act in Section 401D is unambiguous that this condition had to be there, it's also unambiguous that it happened by operation of law. … And if they happen to take listed species, they could be subject to civil and potentially criminal fines under both the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — in re: UPS "Air-In-Ground" Mktg & SPL

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2013

    Okay, so two comments in response to that. … As I said at the beginning, any issue that this might be misleading or deceptive, this is not a Consumer Protection Act claim.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — City of Chicago v. BP P.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026

    That is their causal chain, but I'd also say, again, another colorable defense is that these claims, these state law claims are preempted and precluded by our constitutional structure and the Clean Air … Act.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Eskender Getachew

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

    Getachew was acting within the scope of his authority in prescribing the Case to the end of the case that was his defense. … Get a choose absence and Then says thank you very much go on your way and And then makes another derogatory comment to the jury About dr.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Darvin Perez-Sanchez v. U.S. Attorney General

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2019

    I just want to kind of be clear here that the reason I think you have a lot of merit in the way the statute reads clean, so why have you been losing in all of the other circuits, that, as I understand … And I think it defies the idea that 1229 is unambiguous under Pereira, period.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Guy Rowland v. Kevin Chappell

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

    Now, counsel, let me stop you right there because I appreciate your argument and on a clean slate, it makes sense what you're saying, but it's not a clean slate. … But it was certainly the subject of much talk, of hearings for an extensive period of time prior to that effective date. It was, it's filed the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.

    85 min of audio
  • Oral argument — David Igasaki v. IDFPR

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2020

    And that's why I made the comment that I did, because I don't believe it's appropriate to... But you didn't raise it with the district court. So we do consider things de novo. … Igasaki admitted that he was told repeatedly to clean and organize his office. And Mr.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Edwards

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2012

    What he did inside the apartment was an entirely separate act, totally separate. … I don't think if I shoot a gun through this wall here, I would equate that with shooting the gun up in the air. I feel like they're both reckless.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Mejia

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 20, 2025

    It says was the motion has to be within the two-year period. … So that was going back to address Justice DeArmond's and Justice Steigman's comments earlier. I'll go to, and then I'm trying to think of my next point.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Byron v. Brickman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2019

    Doesn't deserve the comment, unless you have proof, that he's corrupt. People read this, they're assuming he's corrupt. … It's not a question that I'm in competition with this lady here and the idea of selling clothes or doing dry clean or something like that.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tesla Motors, Inc. v. Cristina Balan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2024

    Bazzieri, that the district court, the Western District of Washington, aired when they closed balance 2019 libel claim. And that libel claim was only against Tesla. It wasn't against Musk. … And so I don't see how you now can pretend, well, it should have been a stay, so we'll act as if it is a stay. It isn't a stay. It's a dismissal. The case is over.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Drummond Coal Sales Inc., Appellant/Cross v. Kinder Morgan Operating LP "C", Appellee/Cross

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

    Well, Judge Carr, as you mentioned 1972, which is when the Clean Air Act was passed, all these plants have been in operation since that time and before and have been subject to those regulations for decades … Well, the law is clear both in New York and everywhere else, this court included, that feudal acts are not required by the law.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Anthony Moore

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2014

    I think my best argument is that there's no support in the record as to how you pull this number 12 out of the air. Okay. The other factors that we are appealing is the no alcohol factor, condition. … Presumably he's gotten through the period of the need for 12 times a month of testing. I don't know, Your Honor. I don't know what his history has been under supervision.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. English

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2023

    This is a clean, simple, bright-line rule. … that six month period.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Michael Small v. Welldyne, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

    She dealt with well-dyed defendants for a significant period of time. … Clean on the floor, but if you look at the label it says poison?

    63 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2017

    It is true that at that time dividends were declared and $250,000 or thereabouts was reserved, which incidentally survived through a period of 18 years later when this claim first arose. … The presumption is that they were acting in their appropriate role, wearing the hat of Greenlease when operating as their directors.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Space Exploration v. The Boeing Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

    And here, what we're talking about is a threatened boycott of the government acting as a customer. … Collins' clients acted badly.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — SCHECHNER v. DHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2011

    Schechner says that his work performance was good, but then she found that he committed three acts of negligence during this period of time. … He does dispute the adequacy of his work performance during this period.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Vanoosting v. Sellars

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2012

    The doctor who initially treated her gave her medications, sent her for physical therapy, and she did that for a period of weeks until she asked that doctor for a release because just prior to this wreck … She cleans their house. She prepares their meals. But they buy the food. So it was part of an offer of proof. She couldn't even explain any of that.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Cannon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2024

    It was all up in the air what would happen in the state court. Defense counsel did not proceed by explaining what the state court resolution would be. … And the district court's comments about unmitigable comment, unmitigable offense conduct are so extreme, so unacceptable, so out of the ballpark here that we're asking for reversal.

    22 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.