Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.67s
Oral argument — Direct Focus Inc. v. Admiral Insurance
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003
So what are the predicate acts for the loss – for this known loss? The predicate acts – What is it that kicks in the known loss doctrine here? … The record is actually silent as to when the 1997 ads were taken off the air. The record does support that they weren't taken off the air immediately in response to the cease and desist letter.
39 min of audioOral argument — Valdes v. Stateof NJ
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
At this point, he's a trainee, and the regulation says that all trainees are to be clean shaven, period. It doesn't say anything about any exemption for anybody. … Yeah, but that really isn't playing here, because the regulation on its face simply requires all trainees to be clean-shaven.
38 min of audioOral argument — In Re Basell Poliolefine
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2008
But the overlapping period, there was solid prosecution in both applications. … In addition, the comments on the 496 anticipating claims, the 496 didn't even exist.
36 min of audioOral argument — EEOC v. Ryan's Pointe Houston, L.L.C., et a
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2020
Additionally, she testified that while Villalobos was property manager, there were no clean units to show to protective tenants. But then she testified, actually, yes, there were clean units. … She acted as a firewall between whatever racial and ethnicities were being deduced from the statements that were said to her between February 9th and about.
38 min of audioOral argument — De'Angelo Cross v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2018
Davis was acting. … I think one point to clean from Your Honor's comment. Maybe the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of Wisconsin will drop this language now. I don't know.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. ARNT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2006
It ought to be just go to a jury, period, which is what you just said. But our standard keeps saying it's abuse of discretion. How do we deal with that? … Arendt was actually residing with her husband at Incirlik Air Base in Turkey at the time of the offense.
39 min of audioOral argument — In Re AE Liquidation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016
How could a brief statement of the basis for reducing the notification period satisfy the mandate of the statute and give to employees the information they need to determine whether a notice period was … properly shortened under the Act if there's no reference to the Act itself?
57 min of audioOral argument — Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2017
It is true that at that time dividends were declared and $250,000 or thereabouts was reserved, which incidentally survived through a period of 18 years later when this claim first arose. … The presumption is that they were acting in their appropriate role, wearing the hat of Greenlease when operating as their directors.
56 min of audioOral argument — CA Energy Commission v. DOE
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2008
Now, also bear in mind that the time for comments closed less than or just barely a month before that six-month period ended. So there was very little time to review the comments at that point. … I just want to make a few supplementary comments.
51 min of audioOral argument — Dung Nguyen v. CSS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 19, 2012
I would like to say just a few words about Judge Alarcon's comment. The listing issue, I think, is claimant's best issue and does not depend on credibility. … Let's just pull that out of the air. Well, for SSI applications, you can't. I don't know the exact dollar amount. But I would assume it would be thousands of dollars. Tens of thousands?
22 min of audioOral argument — We CBD, LLC v. Planet Nine Private Air, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2024
And of course, it should not have acted as the fact-finder in this case at the summary judgment stage in the first place. … Well, we consented to the forfeiture for many months and a long period of time until it was rotten. And my client, who doesn't have a ton of money, said, don't do it anymore.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Bhatia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007
So the government said – didn't specifically mention anything about a clean room methodology. … Certainly the district court thought at one point in his comments that Mr.
45 min of audioOral argument — Defense v. Raytheon Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2009
Negligence in the air is not enough. Imputed interest is not enough. … You said that allocating the cost to a period and paying the cost in that period are not the same.
32 min of audioOral argument — Ricardo Machuca v. Mike McDonald
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2012
Eric said the blood was on his clothing and he helped to clean him up. And Wes said that the blood, he could see the injury on his hand. … I think that question is up in the air, at least slightly at this point, Your Honor. I'd like to agree with you and say that after Harrington v.
35 min of audioOral argument — John Doe v. Edmund Brown, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2011
Because the Court isn't writing on a clean slate. Well, but what facts were wrong? What fact was wrong? That's your burden. … Your Honor, the State just made a critical comment. Counsel, if you don't mind, for the record, just in case. I apologize, Your Honor.
37 min of audioOral argument — Noyes v.Kelley services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2006
It was within the discovery cutoff period. As is Rick Ross. Rick Ross was within the expert discovery period. Rick Ross is the expert. So for trial, there's no issue? No. … It's not just discrimination in the air or pretext in the air. It is that – What's your best authority for what the standard is that the plaintiff needs to meet for pretext?
38 min of audioOral argument — Page v. Trusteesof Penn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2007
Two police officers entered, one who was male, and it became they had to clean out another officer's locker. … It has to be done at certain periods of time.
23 min of audioOral argument — Solomon Colors, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2011
Now plaintiff's counsel objected to this document on the basis that it applied to a prior audit period. … In fact, the paint store has the ability to clean them out and use them again.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gerardo Farias-Contreras
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2024
I mean, the facts that they presented, and I think the USA said at one point that a long period of incarceration is necessary, right? But 151 months is a long period of incarceration, right? … And first, that this line we're talking about doesn't change whether or not it's on plain air or preserved air. The line stays the same. And in this case, the government crossed that line.
68 min of audioOral argument — Beach Forwarders, Inc. v. Service By Air, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022
Service By Air. Good morning, Your Honors. James Brighten Booker for Appellant Service By Air. The respondent in this case is Beach Forwarders. … I mean, they do ship freight under the banner of Service By Air. So, they are operating as a station for us. But they're completely independent. They're not acting on our behalf.
28 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.