Documents

Oral argument — Alaska Survival v. STB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2012

in the context of the 404 process under the Clean Water Act, that the Corps has to issue a permit for this project, and that the Corps itself and EPA said there might be initial delineation that might … need to be done for this project But that's a substantive standard under the Clean Water Act, which is the LEDPA, which is the Least Environmentally Damaging Practical Alternative that has to be met.

Oral argument — United States v. Cannon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2009

any notice of the regulations at Edwards Air Force Base that put that policy into effect. … But you can't hunt, period. You can't hunt, yeah. Bad joke, but that dog won't hunt. I mean, you know, that argument won't hunt.

Oral argument — US ex rel. Steven Mateski v. Raytheon Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

in order to conceal the noncompliance with the mandatory provisions of the contractual – of the VIIRS contract and also of the – what was called the NGID, which was prepared by the Department of the Air … It may be conjectured that, look, Raytheon decided they were caught, and now they're going to clean up their act, and they're going to conform with the requirements of the NGET.

Oral argument — United States v. Fruit

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

Judge Hardiman articulated, if those as a matter of law are reasonable, then this question about the identity, the name of the cousin, would be permitted under the Constitution pursuant to a terrorist act … But I'll just point the court, in conclusion of my initial argument, to two periods of 45 seconds during that seven and a half minute period when the trooper asked my client and the passenger about their

Oral argument — Kathy Wright v. UPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014

There was this period when Dr. Yeah. I understand. Get her his name, but said, oh, she can come back to work. … There's no allegation that Bethany Duncan or Steve Redding made any of these comments about her.

Oral argument — Chapman v. Potter

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2008

The question I was really asking was, is there a defined period for which he claims that he needs to be compensated? And what period would that be? Oh, gosh. … But for the period that he's claiming, what is that?

Oral argument — West Texas LTC Partners, Inc. v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2016

Following the December 20th survey, monetary fines of $6,050 per day were recommended for a three-day period, and then a fine of $350 per day was ultimately recommended for, I believe, a 40-day period. … The CNA's own statement was that she used five to six wipes to clean the resident's skin.

Oral argument — Gambino v. WW Funding, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2009

And he was acting as if the refinancing were for his own property when in fact it wasn't. He was acting as if he was refinancing. How did he explain that? … Counsel, the case was well-briefed and well-acted.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Cooper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2019

Cooper told her that the summer work travel employees would live above a yoga studio, and that they would do clerical work, cleaning, and computer work. … Cooper that they would be performing sex acts.

Oral argument — Rosi Godinez v. Alta-Dena Certified Dairy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2018

Well, that's a little bit like you keep out someone's felony conviction, and then when you argue the case, you say, oh, they have a perfectly clean record. That's not fair. I agree. … FEHA, the Fair Employment and Housing Act, is different in California. It doesn't list out any of the remedies you can get. So California law is different.

Oral argument — Ad Hoc Shrimp v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010

This record here below from a clean slate, however, it has stated, I think, numerous times that it usually begins its de novo review with the informed opinion of the CIT. … That still is, in the world of judicial review of agency action, that is not considered an impermissible agency act, typically. No, I agree, Your Honor. Agencies certainly can change their policies.

Oral argument — United States v. Anthony Carr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2023

I am concerned, because the judge's comments at times suggested that he thought Mr. … And when you look at some of the court's comments and add on the fact that he really would let Mr.

Oral argument — Independent Pilots Association v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

And that says take into account international standards regarding flight schedules and duty periods, correct? Yes. … There were six of them in the 10-year period. There was one cargo carrier that resulted in no fatalities.

Oral argument — Milton v. Therra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2018

So I understand that different judges might have decided differently, and I understand from the public court's perspective he's got to make a clean call on the jurisdictional issue. … So I would make, I would comment on that as follows.

Oral argument — Sottos v. Board of Trustees of the Firefighters' Pension Fund of the City of Moline

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2017

In this case, the credible testimony of the HR Director of the City of Moline testified that that occurred March 8, 2013, at the end of the PETA period, or Public Employee Disability Act period. … The last time that the plaintiff received a paycheck from the city for his full amount is at the end of the Public Employee Disability Act period.

Oral argument — SHEA v. CITY & COUNTY OF SF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2005

Shea received either holiday pay or holiday premium pay in every payroll period. And, in fact, there were a number of payroll periods where they overpaid him. … But to be a fireman in the ordinary sense that normal people think of firemen, they're involved in fire suppression, not education, not cleaning trucks or anything like that.

Oral argument — Cathleen Kennedy v. Lilly Extended Disability Plan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2017

And I want to draw your attention, the court's attention, to a few comments if I could. And this is in our supplemental appendix. … She is able to do her pre-morbid level of routine domestic chores, including cleaning and shopping. She is physically active. She runs three miles about four to five times a week.

Oral argument — Carla Mejia v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

Well, Your Honor, I agree with the comments, obviously, that was made earlier. … A voluntary act is a voluntary act.

Oral argument — Sondag v. Tremco Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

And I think that's interesting because the comment that was made... The comment that was made as a part of that actual impeachment effort was simply a question to Mr. Kohler. … And the asbestos products liability case that we cited from Pennsylvania actually comments a little bit, I think it's a 2011 case, it comments a little bit about the status of Illinois law.

Oral argument — United States v. Mark Phillips

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2012

Open-air drug markets are everywhere, so I don't think it can include that. … I'll limit my comments to the issues argued by the appellant, and I want to start with the mail fraud count.