Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Bourquin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

It's precisely by definition under the United States Code, a domestic terrorist act, if it were to be true. … Because on 2A6.1 before, it's a substantial expenditure of funds to clean up, decontaminate, or otherwise respond to the offense.

Oral argument — Hopson v. Macon County

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

under the Dental Practice Act to perform without a license. … If they have sufficient training, which we don't know whether she had, they can clean the crowns of teeth but not the margins.

Oral argument — Whisnant v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008

Baker, causing the problem, they were confined in the wall during the relevant exposure period. I'm glad that you brought that question up, Your Honor, because this is a perfect example of what Mr. … It is a bench trial because of the Federal Drug Claims Act. That's correct, Your Honor. The other thing I'd like to mention is the suggestion that somehow Dr.

Oral argument — Hosea Matthews v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2020

His daily activities or things that he inserts into periods when he's not asleep. … No, I, I have one, um, I had an impression from the record, and it, it may not be accurate, but you can comment on it, Mr. Sellers can, if you'd like.

Oral argument — Fermin Valenzuela v. City of Anaheim

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

And the other thing I would say, Judge Lee, we have air chokes here. You have to assume air chokes, not carotid restraints. That is equivalent to deadly force. … The other thing on the Bain Act, there's plenty of evidence to support the finding on the Bain Act. As Reese v.

Oral argument — United States v. Gerardo Farias-Contreras

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2024

I mean, the facts that they presented, and I think the USA said at one point that a long period of incarceration is necessary, right? But 151 months is a long period of incarceration, right? … And first, that this line we're talking about doesn't change whether or not it's on plain air or preserved air. The line stays the same. And in this case, the government crossed that line.

Oral argument — DEAN v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2011

And there's nothing conversely in the record to establish that the period—that any period of disability within the meaning of Section 2501 has somehow been lifted. … Dean cites in his brief involve review under the Administrative Procedures Act, which, of course, doesn't proceed upon the basis of Tucker Act jurisdiction.

Oral argument — Kelly v. Sines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2016

He was groggy and he began throwing his arms up in the air, probably under the impression that his buddy was messing around with him. … There is about a two- or three-second period, if you watch the video, where you just see Deputy Signs struggling, his arms going up and down.

Oral argument — Damien Williams v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

held unconstitutional in 2018 following year my client following filed a motion to reconsider based on this change in law the question before the court today is what are the Board of Immigration Appeals aired … with the requisite diligence is a legal standard and this court has held on many occasions that an agency abuses its discretion when it airs as a matter of law so even if abuse of discretion is nominally

Oral argument — Tesco Corporation v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015

They never came clean with the court. They continued to take the position the invention wasn't in there. … The arguments about all of the other supposed bad acts that my clients did, they're wrong. There are answers to it. That's why the court didn't touch them. The court didn't mention it.

Oral argument — People v. Reyes

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2023

105 just has some additional notice requirements and 105 has the 30-day response period in it. … In essence, the principle underlying this standard, as any good faith standard, is that he who seeks equity must come to court with clean hands. Defendant here has failed to show good cause.

Oral argument — Dotson v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2003

Are we talking about what period of time? The time she, from 62 to 65? Is that what I understood you were saying? … But he wouldn't make a comment on disability. Correct. I think one of the telling medical records here – I mean, Dr.

Oral argument — Attebury Grain LLC v. Grayn Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2020

The business couldn't buy corn to clean to sell to its customers. And the business was shut down. The business did not operate. I think opposing counsel probably sees that differently. … Which appeal are you offering these comments? The appeal we're dealing with now that Mr. Galtagan just argued.

Oral argument — Polo Towers Master Owners v. Factory Mutual Ins.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2006

All these, if you look at how this policy is framed, all these items basically, they occur over a period of time. … And I would like to address the comments about this fax, this August 10 fax. If you look at what is attached, even according to Mr.

Oral argument — Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025

So we know that this took place over a long period of time, although there is some dispute over how long it took because Mr. Snodgrass requested the video footage and was denied it. … Another witness that came to the trial said that they never heard comments about snitching.

Oral argument — Michael Jayne v. Steve Blunk

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2012

Central to the evaluation of the illegal search that took place in this case is the Stored Communications Act. Despite the centrality of the act, the lower court essentially ignored it. … I go back to my beginning comments, which would be it would be wonderful to provide an answer to that.

Oral argument — Gersten v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2026

Gerson committed those acts, that is something that can be reviewed for substantial evidence. … The physical acts, whatever it might be. Yes, Your Honor. You're saying we can review that for substantial evidence.

Oral argument — Raymond J. Lucia Companies, In v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2016

Lucia had no basis for it, and pulled the number out of thin air? … And I think all the commission was saying was that he's pulling the number out of thin air and they don't contest that that's reckless.

Oral argument — United States v. Bhatia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007

So the government said – didn't specifically mention anything about a clean room methodology. … Certainly the district court thought at one point in his comments that Mr.

Oral argument — USAv. Krasley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2022

Can you comment on that? Yeah. I mean, that was a critical issue in the case. … Isn't that for a jury to determine whether his comments are believable or not? Of course.