Documents

Oral argument — Bobrick Washroom Equipment v. American Specialties, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2014

They were worried about being able to clean and put and resupply the towels, et cetera. … There was – the evidence was that the normal – ASI's normal practice was to recycle the tapes on a 24-month period.

Oral argument — Kelly v. Sines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2016

He was groggy and he began throwing his arms up in the air, probably under the impression that his buddy was messing around with him. … There is about a two- or three-second period, if you watch the video, where you just see Deputy Signs struggling, his arms going up and down.

Oral argument — Feminist Majority Foundation v. Richard Hurley

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

As I said to Judge- Well, the advice of counsel can show that you acted in good faith. It can, for sure. In the context of qualified- You acted prudently. … I read your brief to be saying if it's in the air, if it's cyberspace and it's anonymous, the school does not have control over it. That means, period, there can be no liability under Title IX.

Oral argument — BP Exploration & Prodn, Inc. v. ID

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

In other words, if they were filing a tax return, they could not capitalize and amortize this cost or show depreciation on it over a period of time. … It's not feasible for the district court to act as the arbiter of every case. It only should be conducted in rare and exceptional circumstances.

Oral argument — Pedroza v. BRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

With all due respect, Your Honor, I think there are two points that are appropriate in regard to your comments. Okay. Number one, in this case, Mr. … We're not writing on a clean slate here. Yes, it's a matter of construction, but a very general statutory phrase.

Oral argument — Giordano v. Saks Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2024

Air versus Sabre, where plaintiffs were challenging overcharges from payments set forth in a contract entered into between the parties before the limitations period. … And as to that, they need an overt act within the limitations period. My friend proposes two, the payment of wages. That doesn't work here because there is no wage suppression claim.

Oral argument — Adams v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2007

Your Honors, on the lying in wait issue, I have a few comments. First of all, I don't think it's clear that that was, in fact, the theory of first degree murder that the jury used to convict. … Chips' testimony is the only thing that establishes any period of watching and waiting for any opportunity time to act.

Oral argument — United States v. Gary Boyle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2021

Boyle committed anew, and as you acknowledge, heinous act with the victim, but that he had done so before. He had done so on dates before February 4th, indeed for a period of years. … But in terms of a completely different time period, even February 4 to February 21st of the same year would be an unusually short, completely different time period.

Oral argument — Eric Hovde v. ISLA Development LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2022

In that case, it was the Interest Act. They then go on to hold that it wasn't a violation of the Interest Act anyway. I think they found that it wasn't properly preserved, so they didn't address it. … There are several comments they make in the paragraphs they mentioned.

Oral argument — Gil Ramirez Group, L.L.C. v. Houston Indep

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

I want to mention that there were some comments made by my client in the tape that were not great. … period.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Bourquin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

It's precisely by definition under the United States Code, a domestic terrorist act, if it were to be true. … Because on 2A6.1 before, it's a substantial expenditure of funds to clean up, decontaminate, or otherwise respond to the offense.

Oral argument — Fong LLC v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2004

And I believe those, although they are Miller Act cases, are analogous to the bond at issue here. … If, in fact, Hartford wanted to comment on the duration of the work rather than the scope, they had the power to do that.

Oral argument — Whisnant v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008

Baker, causing the problem, they were confined in the wall during the relevant exposure period. I'm glad that you brought that question up, Your Honor, because this is a perfect example of what Mr. … It is a bench trial because of the Federal Drug Claims Act. That's correct, Your Honor. The other thing I'd like to mention is the suggestion that somehow Dr.

Oral argument — Indirect Purchaser v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

It's plausible that these comments, restrictions on supply, discipline, it's possible that these are code words for we have an agreement. … So the two time periods, you had excess supply in the pre-period. You had excess demand in the conspiracy period. They weren't at all comparable. What else do the plaintiffs plead?

Oral argument — City of Burnsville v. Koppers, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2022

Now, given that Beezer is still cleaning up PAH contamination here in St. … Well, we knew it would go into coal-to-air pavement sealant. They've alleged that. We're not suggesting we didn't know that.

Oral argument — Fermin Valenzuela v. City of Anaheim

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

And the other thing I would say, Judge Lee, we have air chokes here. You have to assume air chokes, not carotid restraints. That is equivalent to deadly force. … The other thing on the Bain Act, there's plenty of evidence to support the finding on the Bain Act. As Reese v.

Oral argument — People v. Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2017

Isn't any comment on his failure to say to the police, he was holding a gun on me, I was acting in self-defense. Isn't it harmless here or beyond a reasonable doubt? Not at all, not at all. … But in any event, even if these two statements were air, and even if it was air for the state to question Officer Lowey, and even if it was air for us to cross-examine the defendant on what he didn't say

Oral argument — World Nutrition Incorporated v. Advanced Supplementary Technologies Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2025

You're still talking about a Lanham Act case. You're still talking about building of a brand. … And that's based on that comment at the end of Jarrow? That's based primarily on Jarrow, yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Citizens Legal Enforcement and v. Robert Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013

There was a period of time, I believe at least two instances in the last 25 years. … This was before the inception of NEPA, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, where we would have had innumerable agencies and state reviews and public hearings and testimony and federal register notices

Oral argument — Huynh v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

The Smith case basically says that petitioner's petition, which was filed June 10, 2005, was within the 30-day period of filing post Real ID Act of 2005. … That case, the BIA had made its decision in late 2005, outside of the 30-day period post real ID.