Documents

Oral argument — Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2016

They sort of stuck it in where, and then said the, the Air 21 burdens of proof should apply, but there's nothing like this in Air 21. … Yes, I'd like to hear your comments on the jurisdiction. Sure.

Oral argument — United States v. Erik Green

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2017

I appreciate the concession on plain air. But it also was not an argument about omissions. It was a false statement. … But also, there was no plain air after Shields. I'm prepared to address more questions related to Lindsay.

Oral argument — United States v. Hannibal Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2022

The government argued that his period of five-year probation should be included in that period of confinement to bring it within the 10-year period. … a firearm, such as a felon, possesses that firearm and then ultimately uses it in an act of purported self-defense.

Oral argument — Comp Store v. Compaq

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2005

He told Barron's that he needed to get involved personally in this operation, clean up the management, get things cleaned up, and get ready for a rapid move forward, start hiring people. … The – I've got two minutes left, just a couple of brief comments on the prejudgment interest.

Oral argument — James Swinnie v. Pete Geren

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2010

Over that time period, I don't believe that chart shows that some individuals received fewer hours. … Sweeney made lewd comments and engaged in sexual banter or something to that effect. That petition was signed by five or six people.

Oral argument — Young v. Lumenis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2007

Cleaned up a bit. It's been cleaned up. The reality of this here is this part here is the claw, which is not at issue. The part that we're talking about is this tiny part here. … That is not really ever cited in the papers except in passing in the reply when they commented on our brief.

Oral argument — United States v. Asarco Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2005

EPA acted consistently with that. But the parties bargained over the separate contingency of what if EPA decides it has to do something different. That's what we say was anticipated. … In all big decisions, and there's probably no bigger decision than cleaning up the environment, things have to be done incrementally.

Oral argument — Walker Broadcasting Company, I v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2016

of that The commission doesn't waive The construction period The three year construction period As discussed in our brief The commission in 1998 Revised its rules to adopt Automatic forfeiture provision … and operate Here we needed an application That included an interference study To get on the air and operate It's the same thing In the Clear Channel decision Approving this staff practice of waiver Also

Oral argument — Elassaadvs Independence Air

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2010

In the Air Carrier Access Act, Congress directed the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations that would both ensure nondiscriminatory treatment of qualified handicapped individuals, but also … Taj Mahal deals with the Airline Deregulation Act express preemption.

Oral argument — People v. Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

The client is facing a very long period of incarceration at this point. And there's two options. … Because we also have an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that has nothing to do with Plain Air or Sebi or Gibson.

Oral argument — USAv. Krasley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2022

Can you comment on that? Yeah. I mean, that was a critical issue in the case. … Isn't that for a jury to determine whether his comments are believable or not? Of course.

Oral argument — Protect Our Communities Fo v. AGRI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2012

, responses to their comments submitted. … No, you're actually over, but we'll give you a short period for rebuttal. Thank you. Okay. Do you have a time agreement? Yes, Your Honor, we do.

Oral argument — People v. Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2017

Isn't any comment on his failure to say to the police, he was holding a gun on me, I was acting in self-defense. Isn't it harmless here or beyond a reasonable doubt? Not at all, not at all. … But in any event, even if these two statements were air, and even if it was air for the state to question Officer Lowey, and even if it was air for us to cross-examine the defendant on what he didn't say

Oral argument — Martin Walsh v. Medical Staffing of America, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023

multiple states over a six-year period. … Not the like things that would apply if they were cleaning the hospital as well, right?

Oral argument — Geraldine VanDevender v. Blue Ridge of Raleigh, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2018

So there are higher requirements for this because people cannot go 15 minutes without air. And they knew this. … You were responsible for your acts and your policies.

Oral argument — Beyond Nuclear, Inc. v. NRC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2025

Act. … Is the administrative procedure act, the NEPA requiring a rule of reason a response to comment has to have. I mean, what you're saying sounds to me like.

Oral argument — United States v. Juan Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Then we give him Miranda and, you know, that's a cleaning act. We can do whatever we want. But on one level, of course, they did that because he wouldn't have been there. Right. … I think there was probable cause, frankly, in the morning from the 8.30 to 9.30 period when defendant is acting as a lookout. Even at that point, there would have been probable cause. Sorry.

Oral argument — Claypool Drainage & Levee District v. Hart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

Duck Pond Road was acting more or less as a dam, preventing the further southward movement of the stormwater. … Judge Peterson also made the comment in ruling on this motion.

Oral argument — United States v. US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2021

is a totally separate section of the regulation, and that is section 1271.10 sub A, in which it is stated that certain HCTPs will be regulated, but only under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act … But assuming that it really was just some kind of basic cleaning and trimming, it would remain.

Oral argument — Rivera v. Commonwealth Edison Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2019

We don't think she has access, or this job had access, as contemplated by the act. … I have a couple of comments on that, if I may, Your Honor.