Documents

Oral argument — Syed Hasan v. Eastern Washington State Unive

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2012

Well, what the complaint alleges are discrete discriminatory acts during the statute of limitations periods rather than a succession of acts amounting to a single wrong. … In addition to in the interrogatories and in the statement of material facts, paragraph 193 to 195, which is at ER 1525 to 26, they concede Provost Mason was acting in good faith with a clean slate.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2021

Um, those air those air in a slightly different context. In all those cases, the plaintiffs were the detainees were bringing the challenge, and they were already in immigration proceedings. Right. … Mr Wilson says, Well, there Congress was trying that in Castle Rock Congress, excuse me, the state legislature was acting against the background of nonenforcement.

Oral argument — Lakin v. Casey's General Store, Inc. 1972

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2018

There's the question of whether or not there was a third videotape, one that would have either shown the area of the spill from a different angle or whether there would have been a longer time period involved … And in its briefs, it fails to cite to a single page of transcript or an exhibit to identify what act or omission by the plaintiff was negligent.

Oral argument — Damien Williams v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

held unconstitutional in 2018 following year my client following filed a motion to reconsider based on this change in law the question before the court today is what are the Board of Immigration Appeals aired … with the requisite diligence is a legal standard and this court has held on many occasions that an agency abuses its discretion when it airs as a matter of law so even if abuse of discretion is nominally

Oral argument — United States v. Manraksa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

of 2001, within that six-month period of time. … Teller talks about equity, the question is, are you allowed to present to the jury that you're clean as the driven snow? In fact, you are not.

Oral argument — Appalachian Voices v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2025

There's an open comment period now about the amendment. And so the only thing that has already been approved by FERC is the original project route. And so amendment proposals before the commission. … There might be multiple comment periods. It could get very long and drawn out as a result.

Oral argument — 26-1445_In Re Ligado Networks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026

What we negotiated for in the mediated agreement was for their support during the comment period. … We certainly could ask the FCC, but it is not our comment period. It's the FCC's comment period. And I don't even know—we certainly wouldn't have had any reason to do that.

Oral argument — E&HSteel Corp v. Cpyramid Enter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Acts look to the federal court case decisions for properly applying their acts as adopted. … The court found that this C-17 hangar project in McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey, is a structural steel superstructure facility.

Oral argument — People v. Gamboa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

time period, or 2019 and March 2021. … Let me ask you a comment on what the state wrote in its brief on this point. Here's the quote.

Oral argument — United States v. Patrick Wandahsega

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019

After that one brief comment, defense counsel moved on to another topic, but then on recross opened with a foray into this alleged homosexual act and wanted the FBI agent to develop what it was that had … And that would have been a powerful and sufficient remedy if, in fact, that comment about a homosexual act was error. It is no small matter to have a district court tell the jury to disregard.

Oral argument — Feminist Majority Foundation v. Richard Hurley

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

As I said to Judge- Well, the advice of counsel can show that you acted in good faith. It can, for sure. In the context of qualified- You acted prudently. … I read your brief to be saying if it's in the air, if it's cyberspace and it's anonymous, the school does not have control over it. That means, period, there can be no liability under Title IX.

Oral argument — Gloria Rodgers v. AWB Industries, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2018

The tester did not physically act in this scenario. And had the tester been hooked up to be used for its intended purpose, this accident would not have occurred. … There was no other force, nothing else just physically, that could have moved the propeller other than that air going into it. There was no air going into it, counsel. There's no air hooked up.

Oral argument — Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

That act did not mandate demolition of the Lemon Avenue Terminal, nor did it bar plaintiffs from using that terminal for air and transportation purposes. … Well, they couldn't because of the Antitrust Act, because of federal preemption of air transportation in this country.

Oral argument — United States v. Melvin Knight

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2020

So the fact that he stands and makes any comments is of what I consider to be of much less value. … So if that's a factor, then, and Judge Leon may or may not have it right, why wouldn't we remand to him to give him a chance to clean this up?

Oral argument — Shannon Adamson v. Port of Bellingham

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2018

Well, if you're the landlord and you have an air conditioning system, you might tell the tenant, don't screw up my air conditioning system in the apartment, and here's the operating manual. … And I will close finally, if I may, with one comment. Judge Gould, you asked about how much would it have cost to fix this. I know we have a bad fact.

Oral argument — Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2017

Or that they said, well, actually we need to come clean and take a hit. Or that worked. Exactly. … If the interrelated wrongful acts exclusion applies during our policy period and it says it excludes wrongful acts that are interrelated with a prior time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Cannon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2009

any notice of the regulations at Edwards Air Force Base that put that policy into effect. … But you can't hunt, period. You can't hunt, yeah. Bad joke, but that dog won't hunt. I mean, you know, that argument won't hunt.

Oral argument — United States v. Domingo Pacheco-Poo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2020

Act. … We're going to give you a month or so to clean up your act, get your affairs in order, and then you have to leave under this We don't have this situation here because our person is not on his own.

Oral argument — United States v. Kaspereit

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

with her ex husband, Mr Casperite's protective order was an issue, and she remembers talking to him about it from when she met him in February of 2016 and especially from the August to October 2017 time period … Do you ever comment on the record that he didn't find incredible or I don't believe that he made that finding and a credibility determination about Mr Casperite until the sentencing when we had briefed

Oral argument — United States v. Mohamad Khweis

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2020

And the government's submission to this panel is that it acted carefully and thoughtfully and at great length to protect this defendant's Miranda rights. … They were three interrogation sessions by the clean team.